Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

SOCIAL INTERACTION Social Groups. Types of Interaction Category – shared social characteristics Aggregates – shared space Both can become social groups.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "SOCIAL INTERACTION Social Groups. Types of Interaction Category – shared social characteristics Aggregates – shared space Both can become social groups."— Presentation transcript:

1 SOCIAL INTERACTION Social Groups

2

3

4 Types of Interaction Category – shared social characteristics Aggregates – shared space Both can become social groups Social Groups  Identification – belongingness  Awareness  Shared expectations

5 Types of Groups Primary Secondary SmallLarger Intimate, intense Impersonal, distant Informal, directFormal, indirect relationship Goal orientation orientation Holistic Compartmentalized, specific,ltd EnduringTemporary, short duration Irreplaceablereplaceable ProcessProduct

6 Divisions Ingroups Outgroups  WeThey  Loyalty/identityCompetition Power Unity Ethnocentrism Social Distance - Bogardus

7 Research - Sherifs Competition & limited social interaction  Intolerance; lack of acceptance & understanding; distain; emphasis of differences Cooperation & opportunity for social interaction  Tolerance; acceptance; understanding; emphasis on commonalities Thus degree of tolerance and understanding can be changed or manipulated

8

9 Building Blocks Dyad -2Triad -3 Mortality Immortality Consensus Conflict/tension/dynamic Intense Coalitions Fragile/unstable Stable

10 Factors that impact groups Size Intimacy Organization

11 Axiom of Social Groups The more members of a social group interact within the group, the more they are influenced norms & values, the more similar they become – GROUP = AN ENTITY – functions as a whole – not just individual members Transcends the individuals

12 Reference Groups Evaluation Decision making May or may not be ingroup

13 Blau – Social Diversity “hooking” and “herding” Large groups turn in- herding Diverse, heterogeneous groups turn out- hooking Social parity/equality increases contact, relationships Physical proximity/boundaries --- social connections or separation

14 Networks Indirect and weak connections---but Significant resource Density & extensiveness varies Social capital – SES, gender, race, ethnicity, religion, associations may create the network

15 Group Leadership: Key Roles Instrumental Expressive product process outward inward action/structure emotional organization connections “prods/engages” “glues” respectedliked, affection admired remembered

16 Leadership Styles Authoritarian - instrumental Laissez Faire - expressive Democratic – both possible

17 Simmel – Group Dynamics Leadership atmosphere/style IE roles/coordination(status) Communicationcohesion control commitment satisfaction/productivity creativityhistory/formation IPA Blau factors Evolution

18 Moreno - Sociogram

19

20 Group Conformity Asch - conformity Milgram – compliance & obedience Janis – Group Think & Risky Shift

21 Asch

22 Milgram

23 Janis

24

25 Society as Group Key question – what connects and glues a society? Durkheim  Mechanical Solidarity Organic Solidarity  Likeness, homogeneitydifferences, interdependence Durkheim’s Dilemma – increase individual freedom but increased anomie and separateness Tonnies  GemeinschaftGesellschaft primary group tiessecondary group ties

26 Formal Organizations Secondary groups Organized – goal directed Main function = EFFICIENCY Not necessarily best or most effective

27 Types -Etzioni Normative  PTA, Scouts Utilitarian  USD 512 for me Coercive  Prison

28 Weber Rationality – spontaneous and traditional replaced by “systems”  market place ----mall  Exchange ----barter --- money & price tags  Tutor/scholar ----high school  Anomie ------ Alienation

29 Weber: Ideal type –Bureaucracy - characteristics Specialization Hierarchy Formal rules and regulations Impersonality Formal, written communications Technical competence/qualification

30 Dysfunctions - dehumanizes Bureaucratic inefficiency – the unique Peters Principle; Peters Corollary Parkinson’s Law Bureaucratic ritualism – red tape; ltd creativity Bureaucratic personality Bureaucratic inertia ---- Bloat Bureaucratic alienation Status conflicts Oligarchy

31 Informal System Humanizes Personalizes Bends and shapes Makes flexible; more creative; more responsive

32 Examples “holes in the system” Personalized space Primary groups Influence leaders Group norms Grapevine (emails, gossip)

33 Other factors Organizational environment – factors that impact nature of Bureaucracy context

34 Kanter Hidden corporate cultures – self fulfilling prophecies – encourage those like me – “patterns of privilege” Humanizing Bureaucracy  Issues of gender and race - diversity  Opening up – decrease in/out groups  Frequent promotions

35

36 Tannen and Helgesen male/female management styles Male Image focus – impact of ? on rep. Hold more info – power More hierarchy of decision-making – more supervision or direction Focus on own division- competitive Female Information focus – ask ? To understand Share info more Value communication More flexible – more autonomy Interconnectedness of all aspects of the organization – cooperative 21c – female adv.?

37 Japan: Ouchi – Theory Z Bureaucracy shaped by values/norms Japan  Group hiring and promotion  Lifetime employment  Holistic involvement  Broad, non-specialized training  Collective decision-making

38 Work and Work Style Creative autonomy Self managed teams Flattened organization Less rigid, more flexible


Download ppt "SOCIAL INTERACTION Social Groups. Types of Interaction Category – shared social characteristics Aggregates – shared space Both can become social groups."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google