1. Klaudia Walter, Wally Gilks, Lorenz Wernisch 12 th December 2006 HUMANHUMAN Modelling the Boundary of Highly Conserved Non-Coding DNA

2. Overview Background –What are CNEs? –A+T nucleotide frequency in and around CNEs Phylogenetic Model –What is a phylogenetic tree model? –Likelihood of a tree model –Likelihood of the scaling of a tree –Likelihood of CNE boundary –Variable CNE boundaries for each species

3. Motivation DNA sequences that are conserved between organisms are likely to have special functions. The Fugu genome represents a good model to find conserved non-coding sequences (CNEs) in the human genome. Are conserved regions different from their neighbouring sequences in the genome? Is it possible to define CNE boundaries better than with pairwise sequence alignment of Fugu and human?

4. What are CNEs?

5. Multiple Alignment of Mouse, Rat, Human and Fugu

6. Fugu Genome Fugu genome contains only 400Mb. Only an eighth of human genome. Gene repertoire is similar to human. Human and Fugu shared last common ancestor 450 million years ago. (Brenner et al, 1993; Aparicio et al, 2002)

7. Conserved Non-coding Elements (CNE) 1373 CNEs identified in human and Fugu 93 - 740 bp long; 68 - 98% identical Situated around developmental genes Can act over 1 Mb distance, eg. Shh expression (Lettice et al, 2003; Nobrega et al, 2003; Kleinjan & van Heyningen, 2004) Likely to be fundamental to vertebrate life (Dermitzakis et al, 2002, 2003; Margulies et al, 2003; Bejerano et al 2004a; Woolfe et al, 2005)

8. Are vertebrate CNEs enhancers? Coding Exon Conserved Non-coding Sequence SOX21 gene Fugu / Mouse Fugu / Human Fugu / Rat element 1 element 19 element 4 element 5 element 8-10

9. sox21 geneelement 19 central nervous system forebrain eye Element 19 (Woolfe et al, 2005; McEwen et al, 2006)

10. CNE Target Model of duplication of cis-element and target gene (Vavouri et al, 2006; McEwen et al, 2006)

11. A+T base frequency in CNEs

12. Position Specific Base Composition Upstream flanking region Conserved non-coding ACTAGCCTCATCGTAGCGCAATTCTAGATGATAACA TACCGAGTTCGGTAGGAGCTTAGTATGAGCATAACG CGTGTGCTAGGTCACGGCGCAACATACTTATAGACT ACGCCCTTGCACGATCCGGATATCATAGTCTTACAA A = 0.00 C = 0.25 G = 0.50 T = 0.25 A = 0.50 C = 0.00 G = 0.25 T = 0.25

13. A+T relative frequency across CNE boundaries in Fugu and human (Walter et al, 2005)

14. A+T relative frequency across 2000 genes in human chromosome 1 Genes were aligned at the start and the end.

15. Distribution of Position Weight Matrix (PWM) Scores for CNEs and Random Sequences A position weight matrix (PWM) is constructed by dividing the nucleotide probabilities by expected background probabilities. p(b,i) = probability of base b in position i p(b) = background probability of base b

16. Scores for Fugu CNEs

17. Scores for Human CNEs

18. The sequence logo for the 100 top scoring CNEs.

19. What do CNEs do? Some CNEs enhance GFP (green fluorescent protein) expression in zebrafish embryos. The function of CNEs is still unknown. Necessary to do more lab experiments. Are CNEs defined well enough for experiments?

20. Conservation pattern across CNE boundaries 1373 Fugu-human CNE pairs plus 100bp flanking regions aligned using Needleman-Wunsch’s algorithm.

21. A+T frequency in Fugu, Human, Worm and Fly (Glazov et al, 2005; Vavouri et al, 2006 (submitted))

22. Are CNE ends well defined? Different parameter settings produce different alignments. Even just different mismatch penalties change –the alignments –the A+T bias at the CNE boundaries

23. A+T frequency for Fugu CNEs using pairwise alignments with Human

24. Phylogenetic Model

25. 5’ flanking conserved Human ACAGTAT ATCGTAAT Mouse ACCGTAT ATCGTAAT Chicken AACGTAT ATCGTAAT Xenopus CCACTAT ATCGTAAT Fugu CGACTTA ATCGTAAT boundary Multiple sequence alignment 300 bp100 bp

26. Phylogenetic tree model Substitution rate matrix –Continuous-time Markov process Tree topology Branch lengths Scaling of tree H M C F

27. Matrix P(t) of substitution probabilities for branch length t Q should be diagonalizable. If Q is not symmetric, we need to find the eigensystem of a symmetric matrix S related to Q and to convert results to the eigensystem of Q. Example:  A,  C,  G,  T

28. Estimating A+T frequency around Fugu CNE boundary relative A+T frequency

29. Mouse Fugu Xenopus Chicken Human Conserved scaling  C Mouse Flanking scaling  F Fugu Xenopus Chicken Human Phylogenetic tree with conserved and flanking scalings 

30. flanking scaling  F conserved scaling  C boundary position scale What is the optimal scaling?

31. 5’ flanking conserved ACA G TATATCGTAAT ACC G TATATCGTAAT AAC G TATATCGTAAT CCA C TATATCGTAAT CGA C TTAATCGTAAT Compute likelihood of scaling  Felsenstein’s algorithm: P(s | T,  ) Human Mouse Chicken Xenopus Fugu

32. Felsenstein’s algorithm “Pruning” algorithm by Felsenstein (1973, 1981) uses dynamic programming to calculate likelihood of a tree model P(S |  Recursion: If u is a leaf If x u = a, then Otherwise, Otherwise b c a w u v

33. Likelihood of scaling  Calculate likelihood P(S | T,  ) of scaling vector  by summing over boundary b. Assume evolutionary independence of each position i in the multiple alignment S. P(S | T,  ) is calculated by Felsenstein’s algorithm.

34. Model with common scaling and individual boundaries Probability of scaling  given sequences S 1, …, S n

35. Likelihood of scaling  over CNEs

36. Hierarchical model for  S 1 S 2 S 3..... S n  C  F ) 1  C  F ) 2  C  F ) 3   C  F ) n 

37. FF CC CC Multivariate log normal distribution for (  C,  F )

38. Likelihood of boundary b The likelihood of the boundary is computed by summing over scalings  b and  are independent. Prior on .

39. Likelihood of boundary b

40. Boundary shifts for phylogenetic model Boundary shift0 bp≤ 20bp≤ 50bp≤ 100bp Cumulative frequency12%40%61%80% density position

41. Relative conservation by position

42. Model for variable boundary 000000 0 11111111 000011 1 11111111 000000 0 00111111 000000 1 11111111 0 1 1 0 0 11 0 HM CXF Branches Positions

43. Transitions 1. 0000 0001 0010 0011......... 1111 2. 0000 0001 0010 0011......... 1111 3. 0000 0001 0010 0011......... 1111..............................

44. Variable boundary for CNE1031 Human AGTAGTTTCC ATGCCTGTCA Mouse AGGAGCCTCT ATGCCTGTCA Chicken AGTAGTTTCC ATGCCTGTCA Xenopus -GTTATATAC ACGCCTGTCA Fugu AATAGTTCCC ATGCCTGTCA 10 bp Boundary shift = 154 bp

45. Variable boundary for CNE1043 Human TGATGTTGAA TCATTTAAAA Mouse TGATGTGTAG TCATTTAAAA Chicken TGACGTTCAG TCAGTTAAAA Xenopus TGACACTCAA TCATTTAAAT Fugu TGACGCGCAG TCAGTTAAAT 10 bp Boundary shift = 0 bp

46. Variable boundary for CNE1037 Human TA-GGCCATT CTGATTTGTA Mouse TA-GGCCATT CTGATTTGTA Chicken TA-GGCCATT CTGATTTGTA Xenopus AA-GACCATA CTGATTTTTT Fugu TGTGGTAGGT CTGATTTGTA 10 bp Boundary shift = 65 bp

47. Conservation structure of CNEs

48. Summary Statistical models for CNE boundaries that incorporates phylogenetic information. Aim is to define location of CNE boundaries more reliably than pairwise or multiple sequence alignments.

49. Acknowledgments Greg Elgar (Queen Mary College, University of London) Irina Abnizova Gayle McEwen (MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge) Krys Kelly Brian Tom Tanya Vavouri (QMUL & Sanger Institute, Hinxton) Adam Woolfe (NHGRI, National Institutes of Health, US) Yvonne Edwards (University College, University of London) Martin Goodson

50. References Woolfe A, Goodson M, Goode DK, Snell P, McEwen GK, Vavouri T, Smith SF, North P, Callaway H, Kelly K, Walter K, Abnizova I, Gilks W, Edwards YJ, Cooke JE, Elgar G. Highly conserved non-coding sequences are associated with vertebrate development. PLoS Biol. 2005, 3(1). Walter K, Abnizova I, Elgar G, Gilks WR. Striking nucleotide frequency pattern at the borders of highly conserved vertebrate non-coding sequences. Trends Genet. 2005, 21(8):436-40. Vavouri T, McEwen GK, Woolfe A, Gilks WR, Elgar G. Defining a genomic radius for long-range enhancer action: duplicated conserved non-coding elements hold the key. Trends Genet. 2006, 22(1):5-10. McEwen GK, Woolfe A, Goode D, Vavouri T, Callaway H, Elgar G. Ancient duplicated conserved noncoding elements in vertebrates: a genomic and functional analysis. Genome Res. 2006,16(4):451-65. Vavouri T, Walter K, Gilks WR, Lehner B, Elgar G. Parallel evolution of conserved noncoding elements that target a common set of developmental regulatory genes from worms to humans. Submitted 2006.

51. Human CNE boundary MegaBLASTPhylogenetic A+T frequency position

52. Chicken CNE boundary MegaBLASTPhylogenetic A+T frequency position

53. Fugu CNE boundary MegaBLASTPhylogenetic A+T frequency position

54. From rate matrix Q to probability matrix P

55. P(t) of substitution probabilities (2) is symmetric with S and Q have the same eigenvalues        