Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byTobias Lang Modified over 9 years ago
1
Assessment and Accountability Update Kentucky Association of School Administrators July 18, 2013 Kentucky Department of Education Office of Assessment and Accountability (OAA) KDE:OAA:7/15/13 Questions: dacinfo@education.ky.gov or 502-564-4394 1 Ken Draut, Associate Commissioner Rhonda Sims, Director (rhonda.sims@education.ky.gov)
2
Timeline for Reporting Accountability - Year Two School Report Card - Year Two Program Review Data Release Science/Social Studies Standards Update Additional Information 2 KDE:OAA:7/15/13 Questions: dacinfo@education.ky.gov or 502-564-4394
3
Timeline for 2013 Reporting All dates are tentative. KDE:OAA:7/15/13 Questions: dacinfo@education.ky.gov or 502-564-4394 3 Individual student data released first in PearsonAccess. August 2 K-PREP individual test scores (NAPD) (all subjects grades 3-8, writing at grades 10-11) August 16Individual student reports with student growth percentile Note: EOC individual scores already reported. Schools and districts will have opportunity to review student data for accountability and demographics before public reporting. August 14-27 Data review and cleanup in SDRR September 12DAC training and Quality Control day for system issues Week of September 23-27 Public release of accountability reports via the School Report Card
4
Review of Accountability System and School Report Card KDE:OAA:7/15/13 Questions: dacinfo@education.ky.gov or 502-564-4394 4
5
5 Accountability-Year Two SRC Review
6
KDE:OAA:7/15/13 Questions: dacinfo@education.ky.gov or 502-564-4394 6 Accountability-Year Two SRC Review
7
KDE:OAA:7/15/13 Questions: dacinfo@education.ky.gov or 502-564-4394 7
8
Accountability-Year Two SRC Review KDE:OAA:7/15/13 Questions: dacinfo@education.ky.gov or 502-564-4394 8
9
Accountability-Year Two SRC Review KDE:OAA:7/15/13 Questions: dacinfo@education.ky.gov or 502-564-4394 9
10
Accountability-Year Two SRC Review 10
11
Needs Improvement (Below 70 th Percentile) Proficient (At or Above 70 th Percentile) Distinguished (Above 90 th Percentile) Progressing meet Annual Measurable Objective (AMO) goal (1.0 gain in Overall Score below Proficient or.5 gain Proficient and above); graduation rate goal (AFGR); and participation rate (95%) High-Progress top 10% of improvement; and meet AMO; graduation rate goal (AFGR); and participation rate (95%) KDE:OAA:7/15/13 Questions: dacinfo@education.ky.gov or 502-564-4394 11 NEW 2013
12
Priority (No new Priority Schools added in 2012-13) Focus Lowest 10% in Overall Gap group or meets third standard deviation model for a single gap group High Performing School Top 90% of schools; and meets AMO, graduation rate goal rate* and participation rate goal Schools of Distinction Top 95% of schools; and meets AMO, graduation rate goal and participation rate goal; and has graduation rate above 60% for 2 years KDE:OAA:7/15/13 Questions: dacinfo@education.ky.gov or 502-564-4394 12
13
Percentiles for Elementary, Middle and High Overall Score were set and locked in 2011-12. The locked percentile serves as the overall score target for 2013 reporting. 70 th 90 th 95 th Elementary Overall Score 62.569.872.5 Middle Overall Score 58.764.968.2 High School Overall Score * 58.064.467.7 District Overall Score 58.463.365.2 *At high school, the removal of constructed response in EOC testing means new percentiles will need to be calculated. KDE:OAA:7/15/13 Questions: dacinfo@education.ky.gov or 502-564-4394 13
14
Cohort model graduation data will be used in the 2012-13 calculation for Graduation Rate component (20% of high school Next- Generation Learners). Averaged Freshman Graduation Rate (AFGR) will be used one last time in 2012-13 for graduation rate goals. KDE:OAA:7/15/13 Questions: dacinfo@education.ky.gov or 502-564-4394 14
15
Add Trend Data for Profiles Update Graduation Data to show both Cohort and AFGR Add Trend Data for NAPD Tables Add Non-Duplicated Gap Group to list of individual group scores Add Level Based (elementary, middle and high) data for disaggregated pages Add Norm-Referenced Test (NRT) disaggregated data Add Advanced Placement data if available Clarify language and footnotes KDE:OAA:7/15/13 Questions: dacinfo@education.ky.gov or 502-564-4394 15
16
Tentative Release Date: October 2013 Provided through Open House on KDE website Based on Program Review scores that schools and districts entered in the ASSIST system Scores generated using the Program Review scoring guides/rubrics KDE:OAA:7/15/13 Questions: dacinfo@education.ky.gov or 502-564-4394 16
17
KDE:OAA:7/15/13 Questions: dacinfo@education.ky.gov or 502-564-4394 17 Program Review (PR) Scoring Guide
18
Program Review Calculations Each of the 3 Program Review areas (Arts & Humanities, Writing, and Practical Living) is comprised of 4 standards (Curriculum/Instruction, Formative/Summative Assessment, Professional Development, and Administrative Support). Step 1: Average the characteristic scores for a score for each standard. Scores range from 0-3 for each standard 0 – No Implementation, 1– Needs Improvement, 2 –Proficient, and 3 Distinguished Step 2: Add the 4 standard scores to get a single number for each Program Review area. Scores range 0-12 for each Program Review area The cut score 8 is Proficient and 10.8 is Distinguished Step 3: Add the three Program Review area scores for a total Program Review score. Scores range between 0-36 Step 4: Divide the total number by 24 (proficient (8) x 3 areas = 24). This number yields the percent of the 23 points earned (number of points possible in Unbridled Learning accountability model for PR when Learners and PR are combined). KDE:OAA:7/15/13 Questions: dacinfo@education.ky.gov or 502-564-4394 18
19
Program Review Data Release AVERAGE CHARACTER- ISTIC SCORES PROGRAM REVIEW TOTAL CATEGORY ARTS & HUMANITIES Curriculum/ Instruction 1.0 Formative/ Summative Assessment 1.0 Professional Development 1.0 Administrative Support 1.0 ARTS & HUMANITIES TOTAL 4 Needs Improvement PRACTICAL LIVING/CAREER STUDIES Curriculum/Instruction 2.0 Formative/Summative Assessment 2.0 Professional Development 1.9 Administrative Support 2.1 PRACTICAL LIVING TOTAL 8 Proficient WRITING Curriculum/Instruction 1.4 Formative/Summative Assessment 1.4 Professional Development 1.8 Administrative Support 1.4 WRITING TOTAL 6 Needs Improvement TOTAL POINTS18 PERCENTAGE OF POINTS (divide by 24)75% ACCOUNTABILITY POINTS (out of 23 points possible)17.25 Calculation Example 19
20
Accountability Formula for Combining Next Generation Learners and Program Reviews ComponentOverall Weighted Percent Weighted Score Next Gen Learners Overall Score 57.9X77%=44.6 Program Reviews75.0X23%=17.3 Combined Overall Score* 61.9 * Combined Overall Score used to calculate new 70 th and 90 th percentile cut for summer 2014 targets KDE:OAA:7/15/13 Questions: dacinfo@education.ky.gov or 502-564-4394 20
21
Senate Bill 1 (2009) required new standards that: Focus on the “critical knowledge, skills and capacities needed for success in the global economy.” “Consider international benchmarks” and “consider standards that have been adopted by national content advisory groups and professional education consortia.” Are aligned across all levels – elementary, middle, high and postsecondary. KDE:OAA:7/15/13 Questions: dacinfo@education.ky.gov or 502-564-4394 21
22
KDE:OAA:7/15/13 Questions: dacinfo@education.ky.gov or 502-564-4394 22
23
DevelopAdoptImplementAssess Summer 2011 – Framework released September 2011 – Kentucky accepted as a lead state May 2012 – First public draft January 2013 – Second Public Draft April 2013 – Final release of standards April 2013 – First Review by KBE of 704 KAR 3:303, Kentucky Core Academic Standards. June 2013 – The KBE adopted Kentucky Core Academic Standards for Science September 2013 – Launch Science Networks 2014-15 or 2015-16 School Year – Assess KCAS for Science KDE:OAA:7/15/13 Questions: dacinfo@education.ky.gov or 502-564-4394 23
24
Kentucky Core Academic Standards Next Generation Social Studies Standards-Timeline Social Studies Standards being created in summer 2013 Kentucky Board of Education (KBE) First Read – October 2013 KBE Second Read – December 2013 Implemented in 2014-15 Use to assess social studies in 2015 or 2016 KDE:OAA:7/15/13 Questions: dacinfo@education.ky.gov or 502-564-4394 24
25
Additional Information EOC Online Testing ACT Online Testing System crashed April 29. 1500 students tests were interrupted (1% of total test- takers) 100% finished after moving to paper format. Accountability decisions will be made jointly with affected districts. Financial penalties imposed on ACT. Fall 2013 Stress Test with 20,000 students required to demonstrate to KY the ACT system will work. KDE:OAA:7/15/13 Questions: dacinfo@education.ky.gov or 502-564-4394 25
26
Two Consortia (federally-funded) PARCC Smarter Balance Kentucky is a “participating” member of PARCC; this means Kentucky monitors the work of PARCC but is not pledged to give the tests. Decisions to use the PARCC tests delayed until after the first operational test administered in order to fully evaluate the product and the costs. KDE:OAA:7/15/13 Questions: dacinfo@education.ky.gov or 502-564-4394 26
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.