Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAmber Allison Modified over 9 years ago
1
Woodcock Johnson Results Before the WJIII test results are discussed, a brief explanation of scores is offered. In order to find out what scores are high, average, or low, the test is given to a large number of children across the country. The test is always presented in the same way to all children.The subject’s percentile rank indicates the percentage of the children in the norm group who received the same scores or a lower score on the test. A special feature of the WJIII is the option to use either grade- or age-based norms. A grade equivalent reflects the subject’s performance in terms of the grade level in the sample at which the average score is the same as the subject’s score. An age equivalent score is similar to a grade equivalent, except that it reflects performance in terms of the age level in the sample at which the average score is the same as the subject’s score.
2
Woodcock Johnson An age equivalent score is similar to a grade equivalent, except that it reflects performance in terms of the age level in the sample at which the average score is the same as the subject’s score. It is important to note that this does not mean that the subject is performing at the same level as that grade or age, only that the average score was the same as the sample. The ranges for the WJIII are as follows. High Average = SS 111 to 120 and % Rank 76 to 91 Average = SS 90 to 110 and % Rank 25 to 75 Low Average = SS 80 to 89 and % Rank 9 to 24 Low = SS 70 to 79 and % Rank3 to 8 Very Low = SS 69 and below and % Rank 0.1 to 2
3
Oral Language PR--35 RPI (Relevant Proficiency Index)--87/90 SS--(68% band) 94. These scores indicate that Douglas is within the appropriate average range for oral language.
4
Broad Reading PR--44 RPI (Relevant Proficiency Index)--87/90 SS--(68% band) 96 These scores indicate that Douglas is within the appropriate average range for broad reading.
5
Broad Math PR--41 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--87/90 SS--(68% band) 97 These scores indicate that Douglas is within the appropriate average range for broad math.
6
Broad Written Language PR--69 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--95/90 SS--(68% band) 107 These scores indicate that Douglas is within the appropriate average range for broad written language.
7
Brief Reading PR--56 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--93/90 SS--(68% band) 102 These scores indicate that Douglas is within the appropriate average range for brief reading.
8
Brief Math PR--42 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--86/90 SS--(68% band) 97 These scores indicate that Douglas is within the appropriate average range for brief math.
9
Math Calculation Skills PR--77 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--94/90 SS--(68% band) 111 These scores indicate that Douglas is within the appropriate average range for math calculation skills.
10
Brief Writing PR--60 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--94/90 SS--(68% band) 104 These scores indicate that Douglas is within the appropriate average range for brief writing
11
Written Expression PR--90 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--98/90 SS--(68% band) 129 These scores indicate that Douglas is within the appropriate average range for written expression.
12
Letter-Word Identification PR--63 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--97/90 SS--(68% band) 105. These scores indicate that Douglas is within the appropriate average range for letter-word identification.
13
Reading Fluency PR--4 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--61/90 SS--(68% band) 73. These scores indicate that Douglas is below average in reading fluency.
14
Story Recall PR--21 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--84/90 SS--(68% band) 88 These scores indicate that Douglas is below average to average on story recall.
15
Understanding Directions PR--46 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--89/90 SS--(68% band) 99 These scores indicate that Douglas is within the appropriate average range for understanding directions.
16
Calculation PR--85 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--97/90 SS--(68% band) 115 These scores indicate that Douglas is within the appropriate average range for math calculation skills.
17
Math Fluency PR--42 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--89/90 SS--(68% band) 97 These scores indicate that Douglas is within the appropriate average range for math fluency skills.
18
Spelling PR--31 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--69/90 SS--(68% band) 93 The following scores indicate that Douglas is in the below average average range for spelling.
19
Written Fluency PR--86 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--97/90 SS--(68% band) 116 These scores indicate that Douglas is within the appropriate average range for written fluency.
20
Passage Comprehension PR--43 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--85/90 SS--(68% band) 97 The following scores indicate that Douglas is within the appropriate average range for passage comprehension skills.
21
Applied Problems PR--18 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--54/90 SS--(68% band) 86 The following scores indicate that Douglas is below average for applied problems.
22
Writing Samples PR--89 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--99/90 SS--(68% band) 118 These scores indicate that Douglas is within the appropriate average range for writing samples.
23
Story Recall-Delayed PR--77 RPI (Relevant Proficiency index)--88/90 SS--(68% band) 96 These scores indicate that Douglas is within the appropriate average range for story recall.
24
Summary Douglas’ overall performance was in the average range. His strengths are definitely in math and written expression, which are reflected in his scores. His greatest strength was in written expression followed by math calculations. He enjoys doing math problems involving addition and subtraction. He continues to struggle with identifying money, counting money, and telling time. He is below average in reading fluency, applied problems, and spelling. His letter word identification and comprehension were with in the average range. His comprehension is much better when a story or passage is read to him. He listens and can pick up on some details, especially when the story is of interest to him. I believe with continued assistance and direct instruction he will make gains. He would greatly benefit from phonics instruction because he struggles blending and segmenting sounds. In addition, continuing with the curriculum based measurements weekly will also be beneficial to him and help to increase his reading fluency. This will also provide additional information to the teacher to know how to help him.
25
Summary Accommodations to the General Education Curriculum: Small group instruction, oral administration of tests that require reading, extended time on assignments. Modifications to the General Education Curriculum: Off grade level instruction for reading materials. Accommodations for High Stakes Assessments: Oral administration, frequent breaks, small group testing. Modifications for High Stakes Assessments: N/A.
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.