1. Virtual Cockpit: Terbu Alexander Institute for Computer Graphics and Vision Graz University of Technology An Alternative Augmented Reality User Interface

2. Alexander Terbu Graz University of Technology Virtual Cockpit Context Motivation Our Approach Integration Components Concepts Prototype Evaluation Conclusion Future Work  Motivation- why we did it  Approach- ideas & realisation  Prototype- screenshots  Future Work- ?

3. Alexander Terbu Graz University of Technology Virtual Cockpit Context Motivation Our Approach Integration Components Concepts Prototype Evaluation Conclusion Future Work  Panels (PIP)- physical strain & limited in size  Navigation- hard in complex menus  Widget - still mainly 2.5D  Selection - tracker calibration dependent

4. Alexander Terbu Graz University of Technology Virtual Cockpit Context Motivation Our Approach Integration Components Concepts Prototype Evaluation Conclusion Future Work  Device - pencil (PEN)  Interface - primary viewing plane aligned  Widget - 3D sphere with any content  Navigation - hierarchical structure  Selection - auto-enlargable elements

5. Alexander Terbu Graz University of Technology Virtual Cockpit Context Motivation Our Approach Integration Components Concepts Prototype Evaluation Conclusion Future Work

6. Alexander Terbu Graz University of Technology Virtual Cockpit Context Motivation Our Approach Integration Components Concepts Prototype Evaluation Conclusion Future Work

7. Alexander Terbu Graz University of Technology Virtual Cockpit Context Motivation Our Approach Integration Components Concepts Prototype Evaluation Conclusion Future Work

8. Alexander Terbu Graz University of Technology Virtual Cockpit Context Motivation Our Approach Integration Components Concepts Prototype Evaluation Conclusion Future Work

9. Alexander Terbu Graz University of Technology Virtual Cockpit Context Motivation Our Approach Integration Components Concepts Prototype Evaluation Conclusion Future Work

10. Alexander Terbu Graz University of Technology Virtual Cockpit Context Motivation Our Approach Integration Components Concepts Prototype Evaluation Conclusion Future Work

11. Alexander Terbu Graz University of Technology Virtual Cockpit Context Motivation Our Approach Integration Components Concepts Prototype Evaluation Conclusion Future Work  (Auto-)enlargable SubPanels

12. Alexander Terbu Graz University of Technology Virtual Cockpit Context Motivation Our Approach Integration Components Concepts Prototype Evaluation Conclusion Future Work  Hierarchical menu structure

13. Alexander Terbu Graz University of Technology Virtual Cockpit Context Motivation Our Approach Integration Components Concepts Prototype Evaluation Conclusion Future Work  „Silk panel“ for enhanced depth cue

14. Alexander Terbu Graz University of Technology Virtual Cockpit Context Motivation Our Approach Integration Components Concepts Prototype Evaluation Conclusion Future Work

15. Alexander Terbu Graz University of Technology Virtual Cockpit Context Motivation Our Approach Integration Components Concepts Prototype Evaluation Conclusion Future Work  Test Setup - select one of 6 main / 6 sub colors  Subjects- 18 in total, mostly from TU Graz  Method I- „think aloud test“ with cam  Method II - written questionary  Method III- time measures for tasks

16. Alexander Terbu Graz University of Technology Virtual Cockpit Context Motivation Our Approach Integration Components Concepts Prototype Evaluation Conclusion Future Work  Plot of timings, grouped by tasks and UI‘s

17. Alexander Terbu Graz University of Technology Virtual Cockpit Context Motivation Our Approach Integration Components Concepts Prototype Evaluation Conclusion Future Work  Acceptance ratings for PIP/PEN, VC and pencil

18. Alexander Terbu Graz University of Technology Virtual Cockpit Context Motivation Our Approach Integration Components Concepts Prototype Evaluation Conclusion Future Work  Efficient for complex layouts  Fast and intuitive navigation  Easy selection  Reduced tracker calibration dependency  Interaction possible even with very small PIP

19. Alexander Terbu Graz University of Technology Virtual Cockpit Context Motivation Our Approach Integration Components Concepts Prototype Evaluation Conclusion Future Work  Map some more 2D widget behavior (Cooperation with FH Joanneum)  Improve on VC positioning possibilities  Indroduce animation for navigation and selection  Further evaluation  Extend PEN with scroll wheel

20. Alexander Terbu Graz University of Technology Virtual Cockpit: An Alternative Augmented Reality User Interface Zzzzzzzzzzzz ?