Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

© Harry Campbell & Richard Brown School of Economics The University of Queensland BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS Financial and Economic Appraisal using Spreadsheets.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "© Harry Campbell & Richard Brown School of Economics The University of Queensland BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS Financial and Economic Appraisal using Spreadsheets."— Presentation transcript:

1 © Harry Campbell & Richard Brown School of Economics The University of Queensland BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS Financial and Economic Appraisal using Spreadsheets Ch 13: Economic Impact Analysis

2 What is the difference between Net Present Value and Economic Impact? Keynes gives the example of land, labour and capital used in two alternative ways: 1. To dig a hole in the ground; 2. To build a hospital. The two projects have the same economic impact, in terms of generating income for factors of production and inducing additional expenditures, but the hospital has a higher net present value than the hole in the ground.

3 The Circular Flow of National Income

4 The National Income Multiplier Consider three models which can be used to derive the national income multiplier: 1. A closed economy, no taxes; 2. A closed economy, with exogenous taxes; 3. An open economy, with endogenous taxes. Symbols: Y = national income;C = consumption expenditure; S = Savings;I = investment expenditure; T = tax revenues;G = government expenditure; X = value of exports;M = value of imports

5 Model 1: Closed economy, no taxes Y = C + I + G C = A* + bY, where A* is autonomous consumption expenditure, and investment and government expenditure are exogenous. Substitute to get: Y = A* + bY + I* + G* where “ * ” indicates a variable which is exogenous to the model (i.e. is assumed to be constant). Solve to get: Y = (1/(1-b))(A* + I* +G*), where (1/(1-b) is the national income multiplier. Now dY = (1/(1-b) dG*

6 Model 2: Closed economy, with exogenous taxes Y = C + I + G C = A + b(Y - T) Substitute: Y = A* + b(Y - T*) + I* + G* Solve: Y = (1/(1-b)(A* + I* + G* - bT*) Now: dY = (1/(1-b)(dG* - bdT*) Note that if extra government expenditure is financed by increasing tax revenues, dG* = dT*, dY = dG* i.e. the balanced budget multiplier is 1.

7 Model 3: Open economy, with endogenous taxes Y = C + I + G + X - M Note that X is added because income is generated in production of exports, but the component of C+I+G that represents imports (M) is subtracted because no domestic income is generated by imports. C = A + b(Y - T) T = tY M = mY Substitute: Y = A* + b(Y - tY) + I* +G* + X* - mY Solve: Y = [1/(1-b(1-t)+m)](A* + I* + G* + X*) Using plausible values: t=0.3; m=0.25; b=0.9, the multiplier takes the value 1.45.

8 The Employment Multiplier Suppose that average per worker income is $y. The number of ‘jobs’ in the economy is, therefore: L = kY, where k = 1/y. The extra number of jobs resulting from an increase in government expenditure is, therefore: dL = kdY, which, from Model 3, can be written as: dL = k[1/(1-b(1-t)+m)]dG*, where k[1/(1-b(1-t)+m)] is the employment multiplier.

9 Some points to note: 1. The size of the multiplier is inversely related to the size of the ‘leakages’: (1-b), t, m. The smaller the region (extent of the referent group) the larger the leakage caused by imports, and the smaller the multiplier. 2.National income, Y, is expressed in nominal terms. We can think of Y being the product of the average price of goods and services, P, times the quantity produced, Q. Y = PQ An increase in Y could be caused by changes in P and/or Q: dY = dP.Q + P.dQ but only changes in Q generate changes in real income. In other words, some of the multiplier effect could represent inflation.

10 3. Any project involving the use of scarce factors of production will generate income and, hence, expenditures and a multiplier effect. In comparing the economic impact of projects, it is the relative multiplier effects that count, and these may not differ significantly. 4. Multiplier effects may be particularly associated with the construction phase of a project, and, in that case, will be of limited duration. 5. Multiplier effects can be considered a benefit of the project only in so far as they are ‘real’ (i.e. represent the value of extra output net of any additional opportunity costs), and would not have occurred in the absence of the project (i.e. would not have been generated by an alternative project).

11 Inter-Industry Analysis

12 The fixed coefficients of an input-output model Where y i is final demand for the output of industry I.

13

14

15

16

17

18

19


Download ppt "© Harry Campbell & Richard Brown School of Economics The University of Queensland BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS Financial and Economic Appraisal using Spreadsheets."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google