2. A Platform Independent Tool for Evaluating Performance of Computing Equipment for a Computer Laboratory Takashi Yamanoue Computing and Communications Center Kagoshima University ACM SIGUCCS 2004 Fall Conference, Baltimore 12Oct.2004

3. Contents  Introduction  DSR, a Benchmark Test Tool for Distributed Systems Structure of DSR Node system Applications  EXPERIMENTS  RELATED WORKS  CONCLUDING REMARKS

4. Introduction  Purchasing equipment for a computer laboratory is not easy. –Requirement specification, Designing –Money  Hard work, time consuming

5.  Equipment is usually a distributed system … makes designing it more difficult. –Hard to see the total performance –Simultaneous operation …. Heavy traffic is on the network …. Heavy load is on the server – We want to measure them  Distributed System Recorder/Player (DSR)

6. 2. DSR, a Benchmark Test Tool for Distributed Systems  Records/Replays Real Operations  Measures the Performance  Replay the Same Operations on Different computing equipment  Let Every computer Doing the Same thing Simultaneously  Platform Independent (Java)

7. 2.1. Structure of DSR

8. 2.1.1 Teacher ’ s Node System  Corresponding to the Teacher  Records the Teacher's operation  Replays the operation and Records the performance data – on his/her computer terminal.  Can Direct the every student ’ s node system to do the same operation as the teacher's, simultaneously. –by multicasting the commands which are corresponding to the teacher ’ s operation.

9. 2.1.2 Student ’ s Node System  Corresponding to a Student  Records the student's operation,  Replays the operation, Records the performance data –on his/her computer terminal.  Interprets and executes the commands –sent from the teacher's node system.

10. 2.1.3 Group Manager  At all nodes, the same command can be executed simultaneously.  Needs a Reliable Multicast  Binary Tree form of Node connection by TCP … A kind of P2P  Reliable + O(log N) (switching network)  The Group Manager keeps the form of the connection when a node took part in the group, or left the group

11. 2.2 Node System

12. 2.2.1 Main Controller

13. 2.2.2 Applications and Commands

14. 2.2.3 Event Recorder/Player Commands with the time

15. Messages (show a performance of the distributed sys.) in CSV format … easy to analyze them by a spreadsheet.

16. 2.2.4 State of Node Systems  Teacher ’ s node system can control the Operation State of Student ’ s node systems.  State of Local Operation, SLO –Independent operation  State of Common Operation, SCO –Same operation by all nodes simultaneously.

17. 2.3 Applications  DSR is equipped with applications by it self.  Compare computer laboratories ’ Equipment using the Same Applications.  Applications –Draw –Text Editor –Programming environment of a simple programming language –Web browser –Writer ’ s assistant

18. Draw, Programming Environment

19. Web browser, Writer ’ s assistant

20. 3. EXPERIMENT  Compares the performance of six kinds of distributed system by doing the same operations using DSR.

21. １００ＭＢｐｓ Ｈｕｂ

22. １Ｇ－１００Ｍｂｐｓ Ｈｕｂ

23. 1. Record operations on a computer using DSR. 2. Play the recorded operations on the 6 kinds of distributed system. nFour of them have more than one client computer. nIn the case of these multiple client environment, the operations are executed simultaneously on these client computers. We couldn ’ t find out any delay of the operation by the sight.

24. The recorded operations 1. Read a 7KB GIF picture from one place, in to the draw of each user.

25. 7kB, gif, 1-read

26. 2. Read a 16KB JPG picture from the one place, in to the draw of each user.

27. 16KB, jpg, 1-read

28. 3. Read a 37KB JPG picture from one place, in to the draw of each user.

29. 37KB, jpg, 1-read

30. 4. Read a 3KB text which represents a figure from one place, in to the draw of each user. 5. Write the 3KB text to each user file, from the draw. 6. Read the 3KB text from the each user files, in to the draw of each user.

31. 3KB, 1-read, n-write, n-read

32. 7. Read a 10KB text which represent a figure from one place, in to the draw of each user. 8. Write the 10KB text to each user file, from the draw of each user. 9. Read the 10KB text from the each user file, in to the draw of each user.

33. 10KB, 1-read, n-write, n-read

35. Results (a part, sec.) PC-1PC-2Linux Linux -2 Linux -10 Linux -75 17KB gif max 4.16.2015.35.9 Readmin4.10.400.300 ave4.13.300.73.75.1 2 16KB jpgmax 11.610.211.811.49.19.5 Readmin11.60.711.89.20.70.1 ave11.65.511.810.38.18

36.  DSR Could compare Distributes Systems  PC-1 ’ s performance was worse than PC-2. –mainly depends on the performance of the hard drive or the file server?.  Linux-75 is not so worse than Linux-10. –Cache memory? of the file server machine reduces the access time to the hard drive.  Latency of mouse moving: almost no.

37. 4. Related Works  LoadRunner –Emulates thousands of real life user loads on small number of computers. –DSR: Reproduces the real operations on the real system  DBS –measures the performance of entire TCP functions –DSR: Measures the total system performance of a distributed system.

38. 5. Concluding Remarks  DSR, a Distributed System Recorder/Player  Records/Plays user operations on a distributed system  It also can let every computer doing the same thing simultaneously.  DSR can compare distributed systems –because it is a platform independent.  http://yama-linux.cc.kagoshima-u.ac.jp/~dsr

39.  Drawbacks –Can ’ t use Other Applications  Future works –Spreadsheets, Mail, … –Interaction with Web CGI, etc.

40. Acknowledgements  Ｓｔａｆ f and Students of Information Science Center, Kyushu Institute of Technology  Staff of Computers and Communications Center, Kagoshima University  Grant-in-Aid of the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan(C)(2)(09680401)