1. IP Peering Adviser: KuangChiu Huang Ph.D. Student: 陳佳盈 修宇亮 鄭有志

2. Outline Background – The viewpoint of the leading company: against free IP peering – The viewpoint of the other companies: agree to free IP peering History and development – The liberalization of the telecommunications market in Taiwan IP peering problems Solution to Internet Interconnection Conflicts

3. Background What is IP Peering?

4. Background 東森 ( 亞太 ) 寬頻

5. Background The viewpoint of the leading company: against free IP peering International practice of IP peering – low control mechanism – highly negotiation mechanism IP peering in EU countries

6. Background The viewpoint of the other companies: agree to free IP peering

7. History and Development Liberalization of the telecommunications market in Taiwan 1987-customer premises equipment 1997-communication service Now-whole-open

8. History and Development Three stages of the liberalization of the telecommunications market in Taiwan The opening of the monopoly period The first stage The introduction of infrastructure and competitive period The second stage The whole opening competitive period The third stage

9. buyerseller IP peering problems market

10. JAPAN VS TW

11. WHY?

12. PART 1 (ICP) to make better user experience of internet, afraid losing at the starting point, must spending large of money to hire Chunghwa Telecom's room, put own site colocation in Chunghwa Telecom

13. PART 2 ISP to make smoothly line on own broadband,so set the website on Chunghwa Telecom's website, so they will have to spend big money to buy bandwidth with China Telecom

14. Follower VS Dominator X Internal VS External

15. Internal VS External

16. Follower VS Dominator

17. Dominator → Follower Building a value chain in the industry

18. Follower → Dominator Effective allocation of resources system

19. Solution to Internet Interconnection Conflicts

20. National Authorities Non-dominant Players Dominant Players

21. When the market competition mechanism become imbalanced or peering cannot execute, public power should intervene at suitable time. Order Chunghwa Telecom to announced cost structure to establish reasonable selling price. Establish the market mechanism, to attract foreign content providers. Publish policies to support the development of network exchange center. National Authorities

22. Solution to Internet Interconnection Conflicts National Authorities Non-dominant Players Dominant Players

23. Chunghwa Telecom have set too high Internet interconnection price, They should immediately cut down the price according to the international market. Chunghwa telecom should increase bandwidth of public interconnects.

24. Solution to Internet Interconnection Conflicts National Authorities Non-dominant Players Dominant Players

25. Improve the self-competitiveness ISP providers should try their best to strive for high quality ICP. Non- dominant Players

26. Solution to Internet Interconnection Conflicts National Authorities Non-dominant Players Dominant Players