1. Ninth Grade Distribution All Students337 - 36 = 301 (100%) (less level 1 & 2 students) (less level 3 students in full transition) (less students in full EEN Services) Pod Students 79 (26.25%) Non-Pod Students 222 (73.75%)

2. Distribution Comparison All Students M: 213 70.76% 2: 3 1.00% 3: 18 5.98% 4: 32 10.63% 5: 24 7.97% 6: 11 3.65% Pod Students M: 58 73.42% 2: 0 0% 3: 1 1.27% 4: 7 8.86% 5: 10 12.66% 6: 3 3.78% Non-Pod Students M: 155 69.82% 2: 3 1.35% 3: 17 7.66% 4: 25 11.26% 5: 14 6.31% 6: 8 3.60%

3. Distribution Comparison All Students M: 276 85.19% LD: 23 7.10% ED: 5 1.54% OHI: 11 3.40% I: 9 2.78% Pod Students M: 74 81.32% LD: 6 6.59% ED: 3 3.30% OHI: 3 3.30% I: 5 5.49% Non-Pod Students M: 202 86.70% LD: 17 7.30% ED: 2.86% OHI: 8 3.43% I: 4 1.72%

4. Where do we go from here? Data Collection and Data Management GPA Class Rank (Mean, Median) Referrals Attendance Tardy Rate MAPS Sophomore WKCE Perception Data (parents, students, staff)

5. Data Collection and Data Analysis In addition to new data collection, we will also use past data as a comparison group. 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 Teaming Data of freshman English and Afro-Asian teachers. 2007-2008 Pod Data