1. Member-State Referendums and Constitutional Change: The Wider Implications for the EU Brigid Laffan Director 1

2. 2 DateTreatyYesNoTurnout 10.05.72Accession83.116.970.9 26.05.87SEA69.930.144.1 18.06.92TEU69.130.957.3 22.05.98Amsterdam61.738.356.2 07.06.01Nice 146.153.934.8 20.10.02Nice 262.937.148.5 12.06.08Lisbon 146.653.453.1 02.10.09Lisbon 267.1332.8753.13 31.05.12Fiscal Compact 60.2939.7150.6

3. 9 Referendums/ largest number of all member states 7 Yes/2 No Bunreacht na hÉireann: Article 29.4.3° enabling the laws of the then European Communities entering into the Irish legal system (Third amendment of the constitution) 3 Ireland

4. 1987 the Supreme Court deliberated on Crotty v. An Taoiseach. – Crotty Judgement has had major effects – Crotty renders a constitutional amendment necessary in Ireland whenever the Government wishes the State to ratify a Treaty which in the view of the Irish courts would go beyond the ‘essential scope’ or ‘objectives’ of the existing Treaties 4 Ireland: A Referendum Country

5. Negotiations in the shadow of a referendum Impact of Outcome (Yes/No) A ‘No’ becomes a European Question Response to a ‘No’ 5 Implications For the Wider EU

6. 6 In the Aftermath of a No Outside-In Dynamic Domestic Dynamics Inside-out Dynamics Inside-Out Dynamics

7. One Commissioner per Member State Declaration on Workers’ Rights Clarification on issues of domestic and specific interest 7 The New Deal

8. More Knowledge about the EU? Ownership of decisions-deliberaton over a short time framework but intense Consent of the People 8 The Value of Direct Democracy

9. 9

10. 10