1. Engaging Community Stakeholders in the Delivery of Injury Prevention Messages in Early Childhood Name of Presenter: Orgnization: Date:

2. Project Lead: Locally Driven Collaborative Project: Childhood Falls Project Partners: Brock University – Behavioural Health Sciences Lab Ontario Childhood Injury Prevention Committee Funders: Public Health Ontario Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation The views expressed in this presentation are the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Public Health Ontario or the Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation.

3. Background Alberta’s A Million Messages Ontario Health and Social Services Locally Driven Collaborative Project Early research in Childhood Injury

4. Methodology Year 1: Focus Groups Key Informant Interviews Message Evaluation Year 2: Pilot involved: Registered Early Childhood Educators Parents and Caregivers

5. Focus Groups and Interviews Purpose: To examine perceived facilitators and barriers to implementing an injury prevention messaging strategy. 4 targeted catchment areas Kingston, Frontenac, Lennox & Addington Niagara Region Thunder Bay York Region

6. Focus Groups ( n = 59) Registered Early Childhood Educators Public Health Nurses Family Home Visitors Key Informant Interviews ( n = 21) Physicians Nurse Practitioners Target: Community Stakeholders

7. Key Informant Interviews – Public Health Purpose: To examine perceived facilitators and barriers to engaging community stakeholders to deliver an injury prevention message Public Health staff - Injury Prevention focus ( n = 8 interviews) Targeted catchment areas Hamilton Chatham-Kent Durham Region Elgin St. Thomas Leeds Grenville and Lanark Middlesex-London Waterloo Simcoe Muskoka

8. What we learned … Year One Agents of Delivery Competing priorities RECEs best positioned to deliver injury prevention message Facilitators Consistent standardized approach Enhanced ease of access

9. Delivery Combined in-person and technology Messages Tailored to child’s stage of development (timely) Repeated exposure Achievable behaviour change What we learned … Year One

10. Concurrently – Key Message Development OCIPC literature and environmental scan ▫ clear language ▫ action oriented ▫ positively framed ▫ no more than 5 messages 39 injury prevention messages 0 - 36 months of age Falls, scalds/burns, poisonings Problem solving approach

11. What? So What? Now What? Anticipatory Guidance Framed Messages What can my child do now? So what can hurt my child? Now what can I do to keep my child safe?

12. Message Evaluation Purpose: To assess key injury prevention messages developed for OCIPC for parents/caregivers of children ages 0 - 36 months. 7 Health Communication Experts 6 Parents/Caregivers of children ages 0 - 36 months Evaluated based on five components

13. What we learned… Our evaluated safety messages are grade 4 – 7 reading level “Very good” - “excellent ” match % Length % Clear % Credible % Action Oriented % HCEs89.7488.2796.3392.4186.68 Parents92.3194.0191.8777.8484.64

14. Pilot: Message Dissemination Purpose : To examine the impact of the injury prevention messaging strategy among parents/caregivers of children aged 0 - 36 months on social-cognitive predictors of injury behaviour. Use both in-person and technological communication 3 dissemination strategies ▫ RECE facilitated 30 minute workshop ▫ RECE teachable moments ▫ Email messaging system

15. RECE Facilitated 30 min. Workshop Injury statistics Importance of play and exploration Risk for injuries change with child development What? So What? Now What? Interactive activity – applying the concept Q & A

16. RECE Teachable Moments RECE observes child demonstrating a new milestone Parent/caregiver share with RECE they have observed child demonstrating a new milestone Parent/caregiver asks RECE child safety related question

17. Resources and Supports

20. Pilot Email Messaging System Parents/caregivers self-register Email address and birth date of child(ren) 0-36 months (9 milestones)

22. Promotion of the website:

23. Pilot – Evaluation RECEs Purpose: To examine perceptions of RECEs to training received and the injury prevention messaging strategy including workshops and teachable moments Seasonal variations impact workshop attendance Parental perceptions of topic relevance 40% discussed injury prevention on more than half of the teachable moment opportunities 50% discussed child injury prevention “somewhat more often than previously” 92% indicated that they would endorse the messages

24. Pilot – Evaluation Parents/Caregivers Pre-Post survey (12 weeks) Impacts on social-cognitive behaviour change predictors Knowledge Attitudes Intentions Motivation

25. Pilot – Evaluation Parents/Caregivers Parents/caregivers who attended workshops held strong intentions to the implementation of IP measures Challenges recruiting parents/caregivers to register to email messaging system due to: time of year (spring/summer) some reluctance from parents who felt that they already knew about children’s injury

26. Next Steps Discussions to determine strategies for Knowledge Exchange to Public Health staff and RECEs across Ontario Additional time and money will be dedicated to recruitment and evaluation of the website and email messaging system (may take till end of 2015 to complete)

27. http://www.oninjuryresources.ca/ocipc

28. Thank you! Christina Bradley ▪ Niagara Region Public Health Casey Walters Gray ▪ KFL&A Public Health Diane Mack ▪ Brock University