Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
PublishKristian Wells Modified over 9 years ago
1
Harry Peng 1May, 2003 P802.17D2.1 CRG PHY CRG Report May 2003@ Montreal, Quebec Harry Peng: technical editor Rhett Brikovskis: section editor
2
Harry Peng 2May, 2003 P802.17D2.1 CRG D2.2 Comment Summary Clause 7: total 45 –29 technical binding –5 technical non-binding –11 editorial Annex B: total 71 –60 technical binding –3 technical non-binding –8 editorial Annex C: total 168 –146 technical binding –1 technical non-binding –21 editorial Grand total = 284, 244 technical Addressed all technical and technical non-binding comments –Rejected: 0 Punt status: total 2 –#414 and #1087
3
Harry Peng 3May, 2003 P802.17D2.1 CRG Clause 7 Highlights Addressed all technical comments –Unsaintly words –PICS –Lots of formatting issues –3 editor’s notes All addressed –Official SAPI value for LAPS Value is FE03 16 –SONET rates Punt to WG #414
4
Harry Peng 4May, 2003 P802.17D2.1 CRG Annex B Highlights Addressed all technical comments –Unsaintly words –PICS –Lots of formatting issues highlighted –6 editor’s notes Editor’s note summary at the end of the report All addressed –Signal_Fail and Signal_Degrade interface moved out of GMII/XGMII block Punt to WG of #1087
5
Harry Peng 5May, 2003 P802.17D2.1 CRG Annex C Highlight Addressed all technical comments –Management interface for signal_fail and signal_degrade no needed: clause C.1.4.3.1 comment # 1170 –PICS –Lots and lots of formatting issues highlighted –4 editor’s notes Editor’s note summary at the end of the report All addressed
6
Harry Peng 6May, 2003 P802.17D2.1 CRG Editor’s Notes Clause 7: 1.p.161 line 1 –Revision History: 2.p.169 line 42 (comment #451 [RL] ) –A SAPI value of FE03 16 is proposed, but is subject to approval by ITU-T SG-17. –To be deleted 3.p. 171 line line 4 –“This PICS proforma is at present incomplete...”
7
Harry Peng 7May, 2003 P802.17D2.1 CRG Editor’s Notes Clause B: 1.p.337 line 8 –Revision History: 2.p.337 line 27 (comment # 1083 [RL]) –Receive state machine for GERS and XGERS –To be deleted 3.p.339 line 6 (comment # 1094 [RL] ) –Draft 1.0 comment #425 requests that each RS specify a “LINK_RATE” value. However, it is unclear if this is intended to correspond to the line rate, nominal data rate, or other rate. The resolution to Draft 1.0 comment #345 asks the rate ad- hoc to consider these issues before new text is added to the annexes. –To be deleted 4.p.343 line 39 –“10 Gigabit LAN and WAN PHYs operate at different data rates. An RPR MAC management variable (to be defined) is used to select the appropriate data rate.” –To be deleted as the RS is rate independent 5.p.344 line 45 : similar to comment #1094 ) –Draft 1.0 comment #425 requests that each RS specify a “LINK_RATE” value. However, it is unclear if this is intended to correspond to the line rate, nominal data rate, or other rate. The resolution to Draft 1.0comment #345 asks the rate ad- hoc to consider these issues before new text is added to the annexes. –To be deleted 6.p. 351 line line 4 –This PICS proforma is at present incomplete...
8
Harry Peng 8May, 2003 P802.17D2.1 CRG Editor’s Notes Clause C: 1.p.355 line 8 –Revision History: 2.p.337 line 27 (comment # 1154 [RL] ) –Receive state machine for GRS and SRS… –To be deleted 3.p.358 line 16 (comment # 1170 [RL] ) –Coordinate with Layer Management section. Regarding MDSF and MDSD… –To be deleted 4.p. 351 line line 4 –This PICS proforma is at present incomplete...
9
Harry Peng 9May, 2003 P802.17D2.1 CRG WG task Punt comments –#414 and #1087 –Kway teow PHY nee Wet noodle PHY
10
Harry Peng 10May, 2003 P802.17D2.1 CRG Editorial Comments Will request for editorial license to address editorial comments.
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.