1. M. Ahmad Kamarudin, M. Hayne, R. J. Young, Q. D. Zhuang, T. Ben, and S. I. Molina Tuning the properties of exciton complexes in self- assembled GaSb/GaAs quantum rings

2. Type-II self-assembled GaSb/GaAs nanostructures have been grown by molecular-beam epitaxy and studied by atomic-force microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and power-dependent magnetophotoluminescence. Nanostructures on the sample surface are found to be entirely dotlike, while capped nanostructures are predominantly ringlike. Moreover, an in situ anneal process applied after thinly capping the dots is shown to enhance the severity of the rings and relax the strain in the matrix in the proximity of the GaSb, resulting in a change to the spatial configuration of the exciton complexes and their optical properties.

3. Outline Introduction Sample Morphology and features Experiment 1. zero field photoluminescence 2. magnetophotoluminescence Discussion Conclusions

4. Introduction GaSb/(Al)GaAs can to extend the absorption spectrum of GaAs solar cells beyond 1  m. Provide deep confining potentials capable of room-temperature charge storage for memory applications

5. Motive Compare the differences of GaSb quantum ring by MOCVD and MBE. 1. Morphology 2. Low temperature PL

6. (a)PL peak transition energy as a function of magnetic field at different laser powers measured at 4.2 K. (b) A depiction of the corresponding electron trajectories represented by solid lines for bound states and dotted lines for free particles as the sample goes through a density-dependent Mott transition. (c) The values of the exciton radius squares and the exciton binding energy circles as a function of excitation power, obtained from the fits in (a). PHYSICAL REVIEW B 77, 241304 GaSb/GaAs quantum dot

7. The measured peak shift as a function of magnetic field at the excitation power of about 10 −4 W cm −2. The crossover from Coulombic confinement to magnetic confinement occurs at 5.9 T and corresponds to an effective Bohr radius of 15 nm. The extrapolation of the linear slope measured at high field to zero field gives the binding energy. InP/GaAs quantum dots PHYSICAL REVIEW B 80, 205317

8. GaAs 2.1 monolayers 490 ◦ C 0.3 ML s -1 GaSb ~9 nm cold cap GaAs 430 ◦ C. 100 nm 500 ◦ C 1 MLs -1 GaAs 2.1 monolayers 490 ◦ C 0.3 ML s-1 GaSb Sb Sample Growth Sample B was subjected to a 2-min growth interruption under As 2 flux at 580 ◦ C before being capped with 100 nm of GaAs

9. Microscopy Sizes and area densities of the GaSb QD’s on the surfaces of the two samples Atomic-force-microscopy images of the surfaces of the two samples AB

10. TEM images in dark-field 002 imaging conditions. In sample A, the dark region above the GaSb nanostructures indicates the presence of strain. High resolution TEM images of a buried single-lobe nanostructure in sample A (a), and a double-lobe nanostructure in sample B (b).

11. The dissolution effect of capping the nanostructures

12. LOW-TEMPERATURE MAGNETOPHOTOLUMINESCENCE Low-temperature ( ≦ 4.2 K) Frequency-doubled diode-pumped solid-state laser (532 nm) 30-cm focal length spectrometer was combined with a Peltier-cooled InGaAs diode array Spot diameter on the sample was ∼ 2 mm

13. Low-temperature photoluminescence (PL) data at zero magnetic field Sample A (no anneal) is in blue and sample B (anneal) is in red. Spectra: the quantum ring (QR), wetting layer,and GaAs peaks are labeled.

14. Simplified band diagram showing spatially indirect excitons with electrons in the GaAs matrix and holes in the GaSb valence band of the WL and QD. The z axis denotes the growth direction and the QDs are distributed in the xy plane. PHYSICAL REVIEW B 77, 241304

15. Band energy diagram deduced from the PL transition energies obtained at 15 mW and 20 K taking into account electron accumulation. APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS 91, 263103

16. Explain the difference in emission energy 1. a reduction in QR charging in sample B due to lower unintentional p-doping compared with sample A 2. an increase in the size of the nanostructures in sample B when compared to sample A 3. a change in the composition induced by the different capping conditions for the two samples.

17. PHYSICAL REVIEW B 70, 081302 At low power photoexcited holes are captured by unoccupied carbon acceptors, C−, while photoexcited electrons recombine with the holes in the dots, reducing the hole population and causing a red shift in the PL. At high laser powers all the carbon acceptors are occupied, so photoexcited holes are rapidly captured by the QD, causing a blue shift in the PL.

18. Low-temperature photoluminescence (PL) data at zeromagnetic field sample A (no anneal) is in blue and sample B (anneal) is in red. For this reason, the use of the term “exciton” in this paper should not necessarily be taken to imply single electron-hole pairs, but should be more broadly interpreted to include charged excitons and other exciton complexes.

19. The inset schematically shows the size and displacement of the electron from the GaSb (shaded region) for (a) WL, (b) QD under low intensity illumination and (c) QD under high intensity illumination. The number of holes in (b) and (c) are intended to signify a greater or lesser occupation, rather than actual occupancies. Physica B 346, 421

20. 2. an increase in the size of the nanostructures in sample B when compared to sample A Confinement energies for holes are much less sensitive to size effects than for electrons, and the TEM data indicate no systematic change in QR base length or height between samples A and B Because sample B was annealed, the strain in the GaAs close to the quantum rings were smaller than the sample A.

21. Magnetophotoluminescence Hamiltonian for a single electron in a uniform magnetic field B Time independent perturbation

24. electron and hole pair energy level precession

25. Quantum-ring PL peak position as a function of magnetic field. The lines are fits to Eqs. (1) and (2). It can be seen that the field-induced shift of the PL is much larger for sample B than sample A, and that for sample A the field dependence is highly parabolic at low laser power (b) and more linear at high laser power (a). For sample B, the opposite trend is observed (d). E 0 is the zero-field PL energy a B is the exciton Bohr radius μ is the reduced exciton mass

26. Variation of the magnetic-field, B, induced shift of the QR PL vs laser excitation power, P. Note that an increasing B-shift with increasing laser power indicates increasing excitonic binding with increasing laser power The inset shows the exciton Bohr radius vs P. For sample A (no anneal) and P < 10 mW, the Bohr radius is too small to be measured with the magnetic fields available.

27. Equations (1) and (2) may be used to determine the useful parameters a B and μ by fitting the PL peak energy data over the whole field range in a single operation. Sample A μ = 0.30 ± 0.02m 0 Sample B μ = 0.096 ± 0.005m 0 (m 0 is the free-electron mass)

28. Discussion Sample A (no anneal) has a smaller opening in the center of the QR than sample B, with a higher Sb content. Since the electron is weakly bound to the hole in the QR, when laser power is increased, electron-electron interactions (screening) dominate over electron-hole interactions, resulting in a smearing out of the electron wave function, which increases the B-field shift and Bohr radius

29. Sample B (anneal) has a larger opening in the QR with a lower Sb content the close proximity of the electron to the QR means that the electron-hole interaction dominates, and as the photoexcited holes charge the QR with increasing laser power, the excitonic binding is increased, not reduced. This decreases the size of the B-field shift and the Bohr radius.

30. Conclusions Annealing of the second sample resulted in changes in the ring morphology that effect the spatial configuration of the excitons, leading to quite different optical properties in the two samples. We hope that this will stimulate further theoretical and experimental work, leading to the observation of AB oscillations in GaSb QR’s in the future.