Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 6: The Analysis of Investment Projects Objective Explain Capital Budgeting.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 6: The Analysis of Investment Projects Objective Explain Capital Budgeting."— Presentation transcript:

1 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 6: The Analysis of Investment Projects Objective Explain Capital Budgeting Develop Criteria

2 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 2 Chapter 6 Contents 6.1 The Nature of Project Analysis 6.2 Where do Investment Ideas come from? 6.3 The Net Present Value Investment Rule 6.4 Estimating a Project’s Cash Flows 6.5 Cost of Capital 6.6 Sensitivity Analysis Using Spreadsheets 6.7 Analyzing Cost- Reducing Projects 6.8 Projects with Different Lives 6.9 Ranking Mutually Exclusive Projects 6.10 Inflation & Capital Budgeting

3 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 3 Objectives To show how to use discounted cash flow analysis to make decisions such as:To show how to use discounted cash flow analysis to make decisions such as: –Whether to enter a new line of business –Whether to invest in equipment to reduce costs

4 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 4 Three Elements of Capital Budgeting coming up with proposals for investment projects evaluating them deciding which ones to accept and which to reject

5 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 5 Introduction Recall the objective of a firmRecall the objective of a firm –Maximization of the market value of shareholders’ equity The theory of how to do this was provided in the prior two chaptersThe theory of how to do this was provided in the prior two chapters –Compute the net present value of the project’s expected cash flows, and undertake only those with positive NPV

6 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 6 6.1 The Nature of Project Analysis Basic unit of analysisBasic unit of analysis –the individual investment project

7 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 7 Procedural Outline Form ideas on how to increase shareholders’ equityForm ideas on how to increase shareholders’ equity Plan how to implement the ideasPlan how to implement the ideas Gather information on timing and magnitude of costs and benefitsGather information on timing and magnitude of costs and benefits Apply NPV criterionApply NPV criterion

8 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 8 Generating a forecast Information is often biased towards its provider’s goal (agency problem)Information is often biased towards its provider’s goal (agency problem) There are many ways to implement a goalThere are many ways to implement a goal Some information is not fully quantifiableSome information is not fully quantifiable Impact on shareholder wealth difficult to evaluate when cash flows are riskyImpact on shareholder wealth difficult to evaluate when cash flows are risky

9 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 9 The Nature of Project Analysis We will postpone discussion of risky cash flows to avoid the complex issue of how they affect shareholder wealthWe will postpone discussion of risky cash flows to avoid the complex issue of how they affect shareholder wealth The criterion used The criterion used –find the present value of all future cash flows, and subtract the initial investment to obtain the net present value (NPV)

10 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 10 6.2 Where do Investment Ideas Come From? –monitor existing & potential customers needs –monitor existing & potential technological capacity of the firm –monitor the competition’s marketing, investment, patents, and technical recruiting –monitor production & distribution functions for revenue enhancement / cost savings –reward employees for innovative ideas

11 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 11 Cash Flow Forecasts for the Protojean Project

12 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 12 6.3 Net Present Value Investment Rule A project’s net present value isA project’s net present value is –the amount by which the project is expected to increase the wealth of the firm’s current shareholders As a criterionAs a criterion –Invest in proposed projects with positive NPV

13 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 13 Illustration The following tables show the computation of NPVThe following tables show the computation of NPV –To show the affect of the discount rate, three tables are shown based on different rates

14 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 14 Do Project DCF Payback

15 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 15 Don’t Do Project

16 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 16 Indifferent Internal Rate of Return

17 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 17 Common Error It is a common mistake to start the investment in year 1 rather than year 0 (when this was not intended)It is a common mistake to start the investment in year 1 rather than year 0 (when this was not intended) –Now is time 0 –Like a child, a project is not one-year old until a year has passed

18 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 18 Summary The discount rateThe discount rate –in the first scenario it was assumed to be 10%, and the resulting NPV was $20 –In the second scenario it was assumed to be 15%, and the NPV was -$69 –In the third scenario, the discount rate that resulted in a zero NPV was found

19 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 19

20 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 20 6.4 Estimating a Project’s Cash Flows It is important to remember that when making financial decisions only timed cash flows are usedIt is important to remember that when making financial decisions only timed cash flows are used –depreciation is an expense, but is not a cash expense, and must be excluded –the tax benefit of depreciation, however, is a cash flow, and must be included

21 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 21 Working Capital & Cash Flows Some cash flows do not occur on the income statement, but involve timingSome cash flows do not occur on the income statement, but involve timing –working capital additions and reductions are cash flows –at the end of a project, the sum of the nominal changes in working capital is zero

22 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 22 Accruals & Deferrals Take extra care if you are provided with net income information by an accountantTake extra care if you are provided with net income information by an accountant –the flows forming net income may include accrualsaccruals deferralsdeferrals –these are typically small, and may some- times be ignored

23 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 23 Incremental Cash Flows Only the incremental cash flows should form part of an investment decisionOnly the incremental cash flows should form part of an investment decision –Evaluate the projected cash flows, by (category and) timing, both with and without the project, and find the difference –This difference is a collection of timed cash flows, and this is what affects the wealth of the shareholders

24 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 24 Illustration: Cannibalism A proposed project will generate $10,000 in revenue, but will causes another product line to lose $3,000 in revenuesA proposed project will generate $10,000 in revenue, but will causes another product line to lose $3,000 in revenues The incremental cash flow is only $7,000The incremental cash flow is only $7,000

25 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 25 Illustration: Prior Expenses R&D expenses are $10,000 to-date for your project, and you plan to spend another $20,000, making $30,000 in allR&D expenses are $10,000 to-date for your project, and you plan to spend another $20,000, making $30,000 in all –The $10,000 is a sunk cost. The decision whether to undertake the project will not change this expenditure –Only the $20,000 is an incremental cost, and the $10,000 should be excluded

26 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 26 Sunk Costs Shareholders are interested in the timing and magnitude of cash flowsShareholders are interested in the timing and magnitude of cash flows –From an investor’s vantage, a project gives rise to an alternative cash flow –If (alternative cash flows) - (original cash flows) is valuable to shareholders, do project –A sunk cost has no impact on future cash flows: it is irrelevant to shareholders

27 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 27 Illustration: Underutilized Resources A project uses an existing (non-cancelable) leased warehouse with a remaining life of 20 years, and total annual rent of $100,000A project uses an existing (non-cancelable) leased warehouse with a remaining life of 20 years, and total annual rent of $100,000 The warehouse is projected to remain 50% utilized, unless your project is undertakenThe warehouse is projected to remain 50% utilized, unless your project is undertaken The lease prohibits sub-leasingThe lease prohibits sub-leasing The current project is making a lossThe current project is making a loss Your project will use 25% of the warehouseYour project will use 25% of the warehouse What should the project be charged?What should the project be charged?

28 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 28 Proposed Solution 1 The original project currently using the warehouse is making a loss:The original project currently using the warehouse is making a loss: –“Charge the full $100,000 /year so the company can recover the very real warehousing costs.”

29 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 29 Proposed Solution 2 Half the warehouse is available:Half the warehouse is available: –“The project should be charged the full $50,000 /year if it needs to use it. A portion of the warehousing costs will not be charged-out otherwise.”

30 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 30 Proposed Solution 3 The project should be charged for its share of the used space:The project should be charged for its share of the used space: –“Charge $33,333 /year.”

31 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 31 Proposed Solution 4 The project is going to use only 25% of the space.The project is going to use only 25% of the space. –“Charge $25,000 /year.”

32 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 32 Proposed Solution 5 The charge should be proportioned according to revenues generated by each project--that is fair, isn’t it?The charge should be proportioned according to revenues generated by each project--that is fair, isn’t it? –“The old project’s revenues = $9,000,000, and the new project has projected revenues = $1,000,000, so the charge is 10%, or $10,000/year.”

33 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 33 Proposed Solution 6 There is a suitable new (smaller) warehouse available on the market for $27,000 /year.There is a suitable new (smaller) warehouse available on the market for $27,000 /year. –“Charge the project the market rate of the space, $27,000.”

34 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 34 Proposed Solution 7 The original lease was entered into when warehouse space was cheap, but now space is twice what it was:The original lease was entered into when warehouse space was cheap, but now space is twice what it was: –“The market value of the leased warehouse is now $200,000, and the project should take its proper share of that amount.”

35 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 35 Proposed Solution 8 This is a new project, so give it a sporting chance:This is a new project, so give it a sporting chance: –“The project should be charged nothing.”

36 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 36 Warehouse Illustration The solution in this case is proposed solution # 8, (but for another reason): The project should be charged nothingThe solution in this case is proposed solution # 8, (but for another reason): The project should be charged nothing –The warehouse expenditure will occur whether the project is done or not. It is therefore not an incremental cash flow –With different facts (alternative usage or lease re-negotiation) the answer would be different

37 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 37 6.5 The Cost of Capital When determining the cost of capitalWhen determining the cost of capital –the risk of the project is, in general, different from the risk of existing projects –only the market-related risk is relevant –only the risk from a project’s cash flows is relevant (not that of financing instruments)

38 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 38 Computing the Average Cost of Capital of a Corporation Determine the return to security holders of each class of security issuedDetermine the return to security holders of each class of security issued Determine the market value of each class of the company’s securities, and compute the weight of eachDetermine the market value of each class of the company’s securities, and compute the weight of each After adjusting for tax, compute the weighted sum of returnsAfter adjusting for tax, compute the weighted sum of returns

39 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 39 Average Cost of Capital: Example with 3-Securities LetLet k e be the return on equityk e be the return on equity k d be the return on debtk d be the return on debt k p be the return on preferredk p be the return on preferred V e be the market value of issued equityV e be the market value of issued equity V d be the Market value of issued bondsV d be the Market value of issued bonds V p be the market value of issued preferredV p be the market value of issued preferred t be the tax ratet be the tax rate

40 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 40 Average Cost of Capital: Example with 3-Securities k = k e * V e + k p * V p + k d * V d * (1 - t)k = k e * V e + k p * V p + k d * V d * (1 - t) The average cost of capital is also the cost of capital for each of the firms business divisions weighted according to their market valueThe average cost of capital is also the cost of capital for each of the firms business divisions weighted according to their market value

41 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 41 6.6 Sensitivity Analysis Using Spreadsheets Will the project still be economical if some of the underlying variables are inaccurate?Will the project still be economical if some of the underlying variables are inaccurate? –Spreadsheets are an excellent tool for exploring the influence of estimation errors on financial decisions

42 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 42 Base Case Base Case The following is an embedded Excel worksheet for the cash flow of a firmThe following is an embedded Excel worksheet for the cash flow of a firm –It is generally a good practice to divide the worksheet into two segments, one containing only data, and the other containing only formulae –This practice increases flexibility & reduces the chance of error –It is also a good practice to name variables using Insert:Name:Create in Excel

43 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 43

44 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 44 A Modified Scenario –In this case the cash is piling up (Watch out for IRS penalties in this case!) –The assumption is now made that sales units grow by +2%, unit prices by -3%, and fixed costs by +8% (No, Victor: Fixed costs may vary with time. Yes, Valerie: Fixed costs do not vary with sales.) –Assume a dividend of $1,000,000/year

45 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 45

46 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 46 Additional Scenarios The following graphs are variations of from the basic model constructed by changing one variable at a time:The following graphs are variations of from the basic model constructed by changing one variable at a time:

47 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 47 Was 15%

48 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 48 Was 40%

49 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 49 Was 0%

50 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 50 Was 75%

51 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 51 Was $3,100,000

52 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 52 Consequences –Notice that the reduced long-term viability of the product, together with the dividend for demands, will cause: –a cash flow crisis early in year 5, –negative accounting profits in year 6, –and a serious negative operating cash flow in year 8 when the tax benefits of depreciation are finally consumed.

53 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 53 Graphs –Graphs are a useful supplement to spreadsheets as they may illustrate behavior of the model to continuing changes in a selected independent variable –The following graphs explore a model

54 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 54 Table 6.4 Project Sensitivity to Sales Volume

55 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 55

56 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 56

57 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 57

58 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 58 Spreadsheet Planning Conclusions: Spreadsheets permit management to explore perturbations caused by randomness in the model’s inputsSpreadsheets permit management to explore perturbations caused by randomness in the model’s inputs –This should lead to management correctly prioritizing time to the variables of the model –Management will recognize dangers sooner, and will create contingency plans to avoid their worst consequences

59 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 59 6.7 Analyzing Cost-Reducing Projects Break-even point is number of sales resulting in a NPV = 0Break-even point is number of sales resulting in a NPV = 0 IRR is discount rate resulting in NPV = 0IRR is discount rate resulting in NPV = 0 Price B/E is unit price resulting in NPV= 0Price B/E is unit price resulting in NPV= 0 Payback period is the project life resulting in NPV = 0Payback period is the project life resulting in NPV = 0

60 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 60 6.8 Projects with Different Lives When do you replace a sales car?When do you replace a sales car? –As a car ages its resale price decreasesits resale price decreases the annual repair bills increasethe annual repair bills increase sales people become discontentedsales people become discontented –people who live in their cars demand reliability –customers are influenced by sales people’s cars –a nice car is part of their unofficial remuneration

61 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 61 Data Collection A car uses about the same amount of oil, gasoline, cleaning, tire usage, et cetera, no matter how old it isA car uses about the same amount of oil, gasoline, cleaning, tire usage, et cetera, no matter how old it is –This data need not be collected, because we are interested only in incremental cash flows assume that the degree of tires wear is compensated by a credit on saleassume that the degree of tires wear is compensated by a credit on sale

62 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 62 Data Collection In order to simplify this example, it will be assumed that all cash flows are in real termsIn order to simplify this example, it will be assumed that all cash flows are in real terms Assumed that the required rate of return on cars is a real 10% (Excited already?)Assumed that the required rate of return on cars is a real 10% (Excited already?)

63 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 63 Data Collection Sales people use the Bdella Sedan.Sales people use the Bdella Sedan. The market prices for new and used Bdellas is given on the next slideThe market prices for new and used Bdellas is given on the next slide The expected annual maintenance charges by year are also givenThe expected annual maintenance charges by year are also given Intangible losses have been listedIntangible losses have been listed

64 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 64

65 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 65 Car Replacement First compute the NPV ofFirst compute the NPV of –purchasing in year 0, and selling in year 1, –purchasing in year 0, and selling in year 2, –… –purchasing in year 0, and selling in year 10 These figures are shown in col. PV_ProjThese figures are shown in col. PV_Proj

66 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 66

67 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 67 Interpretation We see that the incremental cost of replacing the car every year is $3810, replacing it every two years is $7,619…We see that the incremental cost of replacing the car every year is $3810, replacing it every two years is $7,619… You are not yet tempted to select “replace every year” because this option does not provide a Bdella Sedan after the 1st year, while replace after 2-years doesYou are not yet tempted to select “replace every year” because this option does not provide a Bdella Sedan after the 1st year, while replace after 2-years does

68 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 68 Additional Analysis The analysis so far does not provide for a replacement car.The analysis so far does not provide for a replacement car. The simplest way to do this is to replace each project with an identical project foreverThe simplest way to do this is to replace each project with an identical project forever We have the perpetuity equation for thisWe have the perpetuity equation for this

69 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 69 Additional Analysis Take the two year problem as an exampleTake the two year problem as an example The NPV is discounted to year 0, the 1st replacement NPV is discounted to year 2, the 2nd to year 4, … for everThe NPV is discounted to year 0, the 1st replacement NPV is discounted to year 2, the 2nd to year 4, … for ever This is a perpetuity due, with interest (1.05) 2 - 1 = 10.25%This is a perpetuity due, with interest (1.05) 2 - 1 = 10.25%

70 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 70

71 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 71 NPV as a Function of the Discount Rate

72 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 72 Conclusion Replacing the car every year is the best scenario, but, watch out for an agency problem. Without the intangibles the answer is to keep the car as long as possibleReplacing the car every year is the best scenario, but, watch out for an agency problem. Without the intangibles the answer is to keep the car as long as possible The Bdella Sedan is like a Volvo on Geritol: it doesn't know when to dieThe Bdella Sedan is like a Volvo on Geritol: it doesn't know when to die

73 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 73 6.9 Ranking Mutually Exclusive Projects Using the NPV method, you are unlikely to encounter any serious problemsUsing the NPV method, you are unlikely to encounter any serious problems –Some managers, particularly those with an engineering background, prefer to use the IRR method The IRR method may be made to give the correct answer, but this requires considerable skill. Avoid it (unless your boss engineer)The IRR method may be made to give the correct answer, but this requires considerable skill. Avoid it (unless your boss engineer)

74 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 74 6.10 Inflation and Capital Budgeting When computing NPVWhen computing NPV –Use the nominal cost of capital to discount nominal cash flows (Nominal cash flows are rarely constant)(Nominal cash flows are rarely constant) –Use the real cost of capital to discount real cash flows


Download ppt "Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 6: The Analysis of Investment Projects Objective Explain Capital Budgeting."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google