1. The 4th Stakeholders Meeting Negotiation and Prioritization Low Emission Land Use Planning (LELUP) Don Lig Province

2. Enabling Environment Assessment of Current Condition Analysis of Future Options Negotiate and Prioritize Implementati on Plan Monitor and Evaluation Low Emission Land Use Planning 1.1 Regulatory Assessments 1.2 Stakeholder Engagement 1.3 Planning & Development Goals & Objectives 2.1 Environment, Social, & Economic Data Needs 2.2 Understanding Historic Land Use Change 2.3 Data & Capacity Gap Assessment 3.1 Modeling Future Trends 3.2 Business as Usual Baseline Construction 3.3 Scenario Assessment 4.1 Negotiate Agreement on Options

3. 1) To discuss on the advantage and disadvantage of the agriculture intensification scenarios 2) Brainstorm and detail policies and actions necessary to implement the LELUP across the province

4. - Activity 1: Plenary discussion on the advantage and disadvantage of the agriculture intensification scenarios - Activity 2: Group discussion to set up policies and actions necessary to implement the LELUP across the province

5. Forest CoverNotes No Industrial Agriculture expansion Forest cover drops to 50% by 2025 A negative feedback loop between forest loss and economic instability 3000ha of the FoodCo’s Agriculture expansion Forest cover increases to 70% by 2025 Increased plantation area and positive feedback between income generation and reduced encroachment 8000ha of the FoodCo’s Agriculture expansion Forest cover increases to 65% by 2025 Loss of natural forest and gain in economics Target60% of Forest cover are maintained by 2025 Environmental and economic equilibrium

6. Key Assessment Criteria Linked to Objectives EmploymentBiodiversity Forest Cover Water GHG Emissions No Industrial Agriculture expansion +++---+ 3000ha of the FoodCo’s Agriculture expansion --++- 8000ha of the FoodCo’s agriculture expansion -++ -

7. 2 nd Activity: Group Discussion Group 1: Private Sector – SMART – FoodCo – New investment Group 2: Governmental Agencies Group 3: Academic Professors and NGOs – CSO – DAFF – Forest Dpt – USAID – Academics professor – WELL Program

8. Policy and field actions TimingExpected outcomes ResourcingResponsibility

9.  Dore, J., Robinson, J. and Smith, M. (Eds) (2010). Negotiate – Reaching agreements over water. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. http://data.iucn.org/dbtw- wpd/edocs/2010-006.pdf http://data.iucn.org/dbtw- wpd/edocs/2010-006.pdf  Engel, A. and Korf, B. (2005)., Negotiation and mediation techniques for natural resource management, FAO Rome http://www.fao.org/docrep/008/a0032e/a0032e00.HTM http://www.fao.org/docrep/008/a0032e/a0032e00.HTM  GIZ (2011) Stakeholder Dialogues: Manual http://www.collectiveleadership.com/fileadmin/user_upload/Downloads/publicati ons/SD-Manual_EN_021111_Download.pdf http://www.collectiveleadership.com/fileadmin/user_upload/Downloads/publicati ons/SD-Manual_EN_021111_Download.pdf  Worah, S. (2008), Participatory Management of Forests & Protected Areas: A Trainers’ Manual, RECOFTC, Bangkok Thailand http://www.recoftc.org/site/uploads/content/pdf/Participatory_manage ment_web_58.pdf http://www.recoftc.org/site/uploads/content/pdf/Participatory_manage ment_web_58.pdf