1. Agenda Structure Group Discussions 2013

2. NSDD/ENSDF Long Range Planning: (Monday Afternoon) – Priorities and characterization of user base What is the relation between ENSDF and other databases? (DDEP, EGAF, AME/MIRD, RIPL/NuDat/ENDF) – How do undergraduates contribute? - Kelley – How do postdocs contribute? - Kelley – Status, outlook and commitment Necessary levels for sustained activity Five year outlook for present manpower – What is a feasible hiring strategy? – What are the plans for Nuclear Data Sheets?

3. Priorities and characterization of user base

4. – What is the relation between ENSDF and other databases? (DDEP, EGAF, AME/MIRD, RIPL/NuDat/ENDF)

5. Priorities and characterization of user base – What is the relation between ENSDF and other databases? (DDEP, EGAF, AME/MIRD, RIPL/NuDat/ENDF) – Is ENSDF autonomous? how? how not?

6. Priorities and characterization of user base – What is the relation between ENSDF and other databases? (DDEP, EGAF, AME/MIRD, RIPL/NuDat/ENDF) – Is ENSDF autonomous? how? how not? – Are other DB’s autonomous? How How not?

7. How do undergraduates contribute? - Kelley Who’s evaluating your nuclear data? What is the Sr FTE per undergraduate FTE? How long before undergraduates payoff?

8. How do postdocs contribute? - Kelley Are post-docs interested in evaluation positions? Are post-docs meeting the needs of ENSDF? USNDP? Are staff positions a better investment? Are post-docs interested in long-term evaluation positions?

9. – Status, outlook and commitment Necessary levels for sustained activity Five year outlook for present manpower

10. – What is a feasible hiring strategy? Are 2-3 year postdoc positions the solution to fill the void of our retiring evaluators? Are BNL contracts the solution to fill the void of our retiring evaluators?

11. – What is a feasible hiring strategy? Are 2-3 year postdoc positions the solution to fill the void of our retiring evaluators? Are BNL contracts the solution to fill the void of our retiring evaluators?

14. – What are the plans for Nuclear Data Sheets?

15. Evaluation Formats and Procedures: (Tuesday Morning) – Evaluation issues – LLNL's Generalized Nuclear Data project: Matoon – XML format transition – Review of USNDP involvement in NSDD action items – Discussion – Tale of two (simple) nuclides in ENSDF: Singh – Format check (FMTCHK) for delayed particle data sets: Basunia

16. Evaluation Formats and Procedures: (Tuesday Morning) – Evaluation issues

17. – LLNL's Generalized Nuclear Data project: Matoon

18. – XML format transition

19. – Review of USNDP involvement in NSDD action items – Discussion

26. – Tale of two (simple) nuclides in ENSDF: Singh – Format check (FMTCHK) for delayed particle data sets: Basunia

27. Status Reports on: (Tuesday Afternoon 3:30-5:30) – IAEA NDS Libraries and Codes – Nudat: Sonzogni – Analysis codes: Johnson Horizontal Evaluations - ongoing – IAEA-CRP on "Nuclear Data for Charged-particle Monitor Reactions and Medical Isotope Production": ANL – IAEA-CRP on beta-N: related to it is horizontal compilation and evaluation of P n and associated half-lives – Compilation and evaluation of BE2 for first 2 + states in e-e nuclei – EGAF: Firestone Horizontal Evaluations - developing – IAEA Consultants Meeting on a Database of Photon Strength Data: Firestone Conferences – ND2013: Sonzogni – INPC2013 conference in Florence & HIAS13 Symposium: ANL – Low-energy community meeting: – IAEA Technical Meeting on "Auger Electron Emission Following Nuclear Decay: Data Needs for Medical Applications": ANL – XUNDL Workshop: (covered in XUNDL status report)

28. Specific Examples on: (Wednesday Morning) Measurements Why do we need new data on 67 Cu?: Kondev Beta- and gamma-ray emission probabilities in decay of 67 Cu: Chen Another interesting case of ICC measurement: the 88-keV, M4 transition in 127m Te: Nica Systematics Motivation for better data/new evaluation Neutron induced fission measurements at TUNL - Kelley