Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byNorma Paul Modified over 9 years ago
1
OFFICE OF PROGRAM POLICY ANALYSIS & GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY The Legislative Sunset Review Process Larry Novey Chief Legislative Analyst, OPPAGA The Florida Legislature Agency Consolidation of Conservation Land Management: Options and Considerations
2
OFFICE OF PROGRAM POLICY ANALYSIS & GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY 2 Scope Review state agency conservation land management costs and unit costs Provide alternatives and considerations
3
OFFICE OF PROGRAM POLICY ANALYSIS & GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY 3 There are Over 9 Million Acres of Conservation Lands in Florida
4
OFFICE OF PROGRAM POLICY ANALYSIS & GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY Three State Agencies are the Primary Managers Three agencies conduct land management activities Department of Environmental Protection – manages state parks, greenways, and trails Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services – manages state forests Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission – manages wildlife management areas
5
OFFICE OF PROGRAM POLICY ANALYSIS & GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY 5 Agency Land Management Activities Planning and review Visitor services and recreational access Invasive plant control Prescribed fire and wildfire control Habitat and species management Hydrology restoration and control Law enforcement
6
OFFICE OF PROGRAM POLICY ANALYSIS & GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY 6 2007 Land Management Uniform-Accounting Council Cost Categories Resource Management$33,516,626 Administration 38,372,012 Support 22,903,005 Capital Improvements 43,712,318 Recreation Visitor Services 33,783,095 Law Enforcement 15,743,770 Total Cost$188,030,826
7
OFFICE OF PROGRAM POLICY ANALYSIS & GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY 7 Agency Land Management Costs are Generally Stable and Average $187 Million Per Year
8
OFFICE OF PROGRAM POLICY ANALYSIS & GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY 8 Agency Management Cost per Acre Varies
9
OFFICE OF PROGRAM POLICY ANALYSIS & GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY Factors Influencing Cost per Acre DEP receives higher funding due to greater public use of lands it manages More facilities and greater visitation in state parks results in higher capital outlay, maintenance, and law enforcement costs
10
OFFICE OF PROGRAM POLICY ANALYSIS & GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY 10 Potential Benefits of Consolidating Land Management Activities Statewide management focus Centralized policy making Greater accountability and oversight Increased efficiency of operations through economies of scale, consolidated management
11
OFFICE OF PROGRAM POLICY ANALYSIS & GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY 11 Potential Drawbacks of Consolidating Land Management Activities Potential loss of focus on agency missions For example, public use versus environmental protection Transition from decentralized to centralized management may be difficult
12
OFFICE OF PROGRAM POLICY ANALYSIS & GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY 12 Potential Cost Considerations for Consolidation Potential cost decreases Consolidations in headquarters and other managerial staff Restructuring workload and activities Potential cost increases Start-up costs (modification of leases and staff/equipment relocation, integrating technology and information systems, signage) Consolidating pay plans
13
OFFICE OF PROGRAM POLICY ANALYSIS & GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY 13 Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Cost Estimates 1,679 of 1,977 positions transferred to DACS Potential reduction of 15 positions Cost decrease of $715,870 Reported it is reasonable to expect that other personnel, vehicles, equipment, and facilities could be eliminated
14
OFFICE OF PROGRAM POLICY ANALYSIS & GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY 14 Contacts Larry Novey, Chief Legislative Analyst, 487-3768 novey.larry@oppaga.fl.gov novey.larry@oppaga.fl.gov Kara Collins-Gomez, Staff Director, 487-4257 collins-gomez.kara@oppaga.fl.gov Claire Mazur, OPPAGA Sunset Project Coordinator and Chief Legislative Analyst, 487-9211 mazur.claire@oppaga.fl.gov mazur.claire@oppaga.fl.gov
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.