1. Challenges for Partnership working: Insights from the EPP Jan Nicholson & Liz Frondigoun Jan.Nicholson@gcal.ac.ukJan.Nicholson@gcal.ac.uk liz.frondigoun@gcal.ac.uk liz.frondigoun@gcal.ac.uk Jan.Nicholson@gcal.ac.ukliz.frondigoun@gcal.ac.uk

2. Public reassurance policing is based on genuine community engagement and collaborative partnerships by identifying, addressing and solving local problems. The participation of the public and other agencies in identifying solutions to problems requires strategies to be flexible, adaptable and reflect local concerns. (ACPOS 2007:3) Public reassurance policing is based on genuine community engagement and collaborative partnerships by identifying, addressing and solving local problems. The participation of the public and other agencies in identifying solutions to problems requires strategies to be flexible, adaptable and reflect local concerns. (ACPOS 2007:3)

3. Premised on previous successful partnership initiatives: RECLAIM 2004 RECLAIM 2004 PHOENIX 2007 PHOENIX 2007 EPP funded by Community Regeneration Fund

4. Delivered in conjunction with CPP through multi-agency approach Problem-solving table:  Culture and Sport  Land and Environmental Services  local Councillors  John Wheatley College  Glasgow East Generation Agency  Glasgow Community & Safety Services  Glasgow Housing Association ACPOS Public Reassurance Strategy

5. Issues Funding Funding Consultation Consultation Timescale Timescale Commitment Commitment Control Control Exclusion Exclusion Voluntary sector; Schools Voluntary sector; Schools Public Engagement Public Engagement

6. Lack of Consultation ‘senior management say that’s where [the money’s] going and that’s it... No consultation...So they can say they’ve done their bit but they’ve not done the research to see what the kids want, they never learn’ ‘senior management say that’s where [the money’s] going and that’s it... No consultation...So they can say they’ve done their bit but they’ve not done the research to see what the kids want, they never learn’

7. The public are not involved enough. All the agencies are working together but what is missing is the public representation. There is no consultation with the public.... the police did go out and do some door to door consultation. But this is not enough. There is no consistent consultation. People should be going back and talking to the public. Even after the first consultation. It should be continuous. The public should be represented. Not by a Councillor as they do not represent everyone in the community. It should be members of the public who should be involved and going to these meetings as well.

8. ...we keep getting told it’s inter-partnership with other partner agencies, but I still feel that even in this day and age they still want the Police to drive everything and we keep getting told that we must take a back step and we’ve all got to take equal ownership but I still think that if the Police step away the whole thing falls apart because the communities don’t take as much responsibility as we do. We were criticised for wanting to own everything but... no we don’t, we don’t own everything,...you know among all the other partners, and as soon as we step away from this in March we will be back to go from call to call to call to call and we’re not the answer...

9. EPP - one year on ‘Is the effect of the EPP losing momentum? ‘Is the effect of the EPP losing momentum? Problem Solving Table? Problem Solving Table?

10. Emerging Issues Communication Communication Priorities Priorities Personnel changes Personnel changes Allocation of funds Allocation of funds