Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 Introduction to Problem based Learning – The AAU Way To day given by: Søren Hansen Department of development and planning Fibigerstraede 11, DK - 9220.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 Introduction to Problem based Learning – The AAU Way To day given by: Søren Hansen Department of development and planning Fibigerstraede 11, DK - 9220."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 Introduction to Problem based Learning – The AAU Way To day given by: Søren Hansen Department of development and planning Fibigerstraede 11, DK - 9220 Aalborg East Phone: +45 96358394, e-mail: sh@plan.auc.dk URL: http://www.i4.auc.dk/sh Lars Peter Jensen Department of Control Engineering Fredrik Bajers Vej 7C, DK - 9220 Aalborg East Phone: + 45 96358740, e-mail: lpj@control.auc.dk URL: http://www.control.auc.dk/~lpj Both Associated Professors at Aalborg University

2 2 Introduction to Problem based Learning – The AAU Way Program for day two (26 th of august): 8.30 Role play of a supervising situation 12.00 Lunch 12.45 Supervision 14.30 Courses 15.00 Unanswered questions 15.30 Until next time ? 15.45 Assessment of course (Delphi)

3 Supervision3 Role-play Six role plays illustrate supervising situations (meetings) Imagine that your group is working on the project from yesterday The group members assign roles between themselves, so that the outlined situation in the role play occurs Each role play lasts approximately 15 minutes Each role play is commented by 4-5 observers

4 Supervision4 Lunch until 12.45

5 Supervision5 Forms of Supervision Process supervision Product supervision Control Supervision Laissez-faire Supervision

6 Supervision6 Forms of Supervision - 1 Process supervision: Sees the project as a cognitive process Facilitates co-operation in the group Starts reflexive processes Asks facilitating (reflexive) questions in stead of pointing out solutions

7 Supervision7 Forms of Supervision - 2 Product supervision: Focus on theoretical knowledge Focus on solutions, which are often given Project report must be coherent The product/construction (or part of) should be finished

8 Supervision8 Forms of Supervision - 3 Control Supervision: The group is tested Thinks on the exam The project period is one long exam Is interested in the knowledge of the individual student

9 Supervision9 Forms of Supervision - 4 Laissez-faire Supervision: The students are left to themselves Lack of engagement General and occasional comments Uses minimal time

10 Supervision10 Forms of groups - 1

11 Supervision11 Forms of groups - 2

12 Supervision12 Characteristics for a well functioning group: Common goal or objectives Agreement about group standards The members ”play” all the necessary roles All group members respect each other

13 Supervision13 Co-operation: group classification IntegratedInstrumentalHierarchicChaotic Role castingAllSome No Work sharingAllSome No Control/LeadershipAllYesFewNo PowerEqualEqual ?UnequalNo Personal EngagementHighFairDifferentLow Group identityHighLow Conflict solvingYesNo

14 Supervision14 What might go wrong in the co-operation between supervisor and group ?

15 Supervision15 Different expectations Students expectations Study guide objectives Supervisors expectations Project and documentation

16 Supervision16 Students opinions on supervision Good Supervision: Overview in chaos Cut through in critical situations Solutions are not presented by the supervisor Ask facilitating questions The group is not controlled by the supervisor but by the group it self Supervisor is well prepared and well informed

17 Supervision17 Students opinions on supervision Poor Supervision: Supervisor does not express opinions about affective questions Supervisor does not give constructive feed back/criticism Lack of interest in the project and/or the students The supervisor has poor knowledge about the students’ work and work process Supervisor takes ownership of the project and controls the students’ learning process

18 Supervision18 Roles of the supervisor – good or poor ? The group member – discipline oriented supervision with focus on product –Takes over responsibility for the project work –Very active in choice of theory and methods –Gives answers in stead of asking questions The visitor – both discipline and problem oriented supervision with focus on process –Stands on the sideline, ready to kick or withdraw –Points out directions where to seek answers –The students own the project The consultant – discipline or problem oriented laissez-fair supervision –Only activated on request –Only answers the questions asked –leave all decisions, planning and control to the group

19 Supervision19 Tasks of a supervisor Before the semester start: –Prepare project proposals –Plan project courses In the beginning of a project: –Help to find appropriate literature –Help establishing contacts with companies ect. –Discussing the project proposal with the students During the whole project period: –Commenting both oral and written presentations/memos/working paper –Continued assessment of the professional level of both group and individual At the end: –Examination

20 Supervision20 Tools for supervision Learning objectives (Bloom)

21 Supervision21 Levels of understanding - Bloom Knowledge –memorize Comprehension –translation,interpretation Application –Use, in new situations Analysis –uncover relations between entities Synthesis –Building something new of the entities Evaluation –Judging

22 Supervision22 Tools for supervision Learning objectives (Bloom) Contracts

23 Supervision23 Contracts Why ? Create common expectations Secure clear agreements

24 Supervision24 Contracts How? Content could be: –Form of meetings –how often are you going to have meetings –how long meetings –where –agenda –chair of the meeting –students’ own objectives for the period –supervisors objectives for the period –areas of response to the Aworking papers@ during the period: Language, structure, details, methods –external contacts –response to the group process

25 Supervision25 Contracts - example

26 Supervision26 Tools for supervision Learning objectives (Bloom) Contracts Students’ peer assessment

27 Supervision27 Students’ peer assessment Students in the same group reviewing each others written material Students in the same group given small lectures for each other Two groups acting as opponents for each other at seminars and exams

28 Supervision28 Tools for supervision Learning objectives (Bloom) Contracts Students’ peer assessment Process analysis

29 Supervision29 Process analysis - content

30 Supervision30 Process analysis – example

31 Supervision31 Tools for supervision Learning objectives (Bloom) Contracts Students’ peer assessment Process analysis Facilitation

32 Supervision32 Facilitation summarizing mirroring asking open-ended questions use why, how, what, where dynamic list of question feedback as rethinking loudly

33 Supervision33 Tools for supervision Learning objectives (Bloom) Contracts Students’ peer assessment Process analysis Facilitation Questioning the team work

34 Supervision34 Questioning team work - 1 Put on the students’ agenda when starting the project: level of ambitions how to share the work discipline of meetings how to solve conflicts social relations

35 Supervision35 Questioning team work - 2 ask to the way the students organize the work and discuss the working process ask to special project functions discuss objectives for the organizational aspects give individual consultations feel the atmosphere - be present let the students discuss try to involve all the students

36 Supervision36 Project supervision - preparation The Group (two days in advance) : What have we accomplished (working papers) What are we doing right now Requested supervision Agenda The Supervisor : Read the working papers Reflect upon and formulate questions to structure and details Prepare for input to requested supervision

37 Supervision37 Project supervision – meeting The Group : Chairs the meeting Takes minutes Presents the points of the agenda All participate in the discussions The Supervisor : Facilitates the students’ own reflection by asking questions Involves all students in the discussions Secure reflections on: –Contracts, working processes, progress, time schedule

38 Supervision38 Project supervision – follow up The Group : Sends minutes of the meeting to the supervisor Discusses and assesses the input from the supervisor Revises working papers, time schedule etc. The Supervisor : Reads the minutes and replies Follows up on requested tasks

39 Courses39 Courses Description Course Description Optimal Control Theory Purpose: To give the students knowledge in optimal control and practical experience with optimal control strategies based on minimisation of a performance index. Contents: Dynamic programming LQ control Introduction of reference and disturbance conditions Introduction of integral conditions Use of observer, LQG control The position of closed loop poles Prerequisites: Analogue and Digital Control (FP6-4, PR6-1, PR6-2), Stochastic systems (FP6-3, FP8-5) Duration: 1 module Category: Project theme course (PE- course)

40 Courses40 Courses Description Placed in a timetable for the semester

41 Courses41

42 Courses42

43 Courses43 Courses Description Placed in a timetable for the semester Syllabus

44 Courses44 Courses Each lesson/lecture (Mini module): Duration 3 hours 45 minutes (½ day) 2 lectures app. 45 min each Exercises in groups, app. 2 hours –The lecturer is now instructor The purpose of the combination of lectures/exercises is to increase the comprehension of the curriculum

45 Courses45 Courses What kind of exercises would you chose? Promote comprehension and methodical ness How will you act as instructor during the exercises in the groups? Ask questions about how they have made their solution Make sure that they have understood the basic principles of the problems

46 Courses46 Courses Differences between project course (PE) and study course (SE) Examination –PE has no formal examination by the lecturer, it is examined during the project examination by the supervisor –SE is examined by the lecturer, normally as a written examination (passed/non passed) Exercises –PE is used in the project, exercises is examples –In SE the student must learn to solve examination exercises

47 47 Assessment of course This was good/usefull: 1.Bdkabdjgme _______________ 2.Jhfsohfhfjlfjfj _______________ 3.Bfhfhajjjljhhk _______________ This needs to be improved or could be left out: 1.Bfkbfkhnfnlk _______________ 2.Bvjsfghfglnlh _______________ 3.Gbehfhthkjkj _______________


Download ppt "1 Introduction to Problem based Learning – The AAU Way To day given by: Søren Hansen Department of development and planning Fibigerstraede 11, DK - 9220."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google