Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The challenge of ‘Keeping It Great’ for marine wildlife.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "The challenge of ‘Keeping It Great’ for marine wildlife."— Presentation transcript:

1 The challenge of ‘Keeping It Great’ for marine wildlife

2 The Great Barrier Reef – more than coral ……… Recognised in World Heritage listing as a globally important refuge for marine wildlife

3 6 species of sea turtles globally important nesting & feeding grounds for 4 species

4 2 million seabirds of 22 species 55 significant seabird islands

5 Significant breeding ground for humpback whales and habitat for dwarf minke whales

6 Important feeding and breeding area for coastal dolphins and dugongs

7 The challenges of ‘keeping it great’ for marine wildlife Most species require specialist habitats subject to human impacts Most species are long-lived and slow breeding Some species are already seriously depleted Human impacts are complex and difficult to disaggregate from each other and from natural change Many species move across jurisdictions within GBR and between GBR and other areas

8 The challenges of ‘keeping it great’ for marine wildlife Most species require specialist habitats subject to human impacts Most species are long-lived and slow breeding Some species are already seriously depleted Human impacts are complex and difficult to disaggregate from each other and from natural change Many species move across jurisdictions within GBR and between GBR and other areas

9 The challenges of ‘keeping it great’ for marine wildlife Most species require specialist habitats subject to human impacts Most species are long-lived and slow breeding Some species are already seriously depleted Human impacts are complex and difficult to disaggregate from each other and from natural change Many species move across jurisdictions within GBR and between GBR and other areas

10 The challenges of ‘keeping it great’ for marine wildlife Most species require specialist habitats subject to human impacts Most species are long-lived and slow breeding Some species are already seriously depleted Human impacts are complex and difficult to disaggregate from each other and from natural change Many species move across jurisdictions within GBR and between GBR and other areas

11 The challenges of ‘keeping it great’ for marine wildlife Most species are long-lived and slow breeding Most species require specialist habitats subject to human impacts Some species are already seriously depleted Human impacts are complex and difficult to disaggregate from each other and from natural change Many species move across jurisdictions within GBR and between GBR and other areas This talk illustrates these points using the dugong as a case study

12 Dugong threatened species of cultural value to Indigenous Australians seagrass specialist

13 Long-lived, slow breeding Lifespan < 70 yr Age first breeding 6-17yr Gestation period 13-15 mth Calving interval 2.5 -7yr Lactation ~ 1.5 yr Adult survival >95% p.a. Sustainable harvest ~2% Dugong tusk with growth layers

14 Conclusions To be effective dugong management must address the issues of: –Conserving the quality of critical habitats and –Minimising dugong mortality

15 Seagrass - restricted coastal habitat subject to large-scale diebacks e.g. 1000 km 2 of seagrass habitat were lost in Hervey Bay adjacent to GBRWHA after two floods and a cyclone. Similar diebacks recorded in pristine and remote areas in Qld and WA

16 Impact of dugong habitat loss in Hervey Bay adjacent to GBRWHA 1992 When their habitat is lost dugongs: stop breeding and move or starve and die Locations of dugong carcasses Date Dugong numbers

17 Change in dugong numbers along urban coast of GBR since 1960s From 1962, Queensland Shark Control Program to reduce shark numbers at popular beaches Nets used to catch sharks also catch dugongs Analysed changes in the dugong catch per beach from 1962-99 as index of dugong abundance

18 Location of shark meshing contract areas

19 Assumptions Netting practice did not change  Dugongs did not learn to avoid nets ?  Dugongs were not alienated from netted beaches by human use ???

20 The dugong by-catch in the shark nets declined at 8.7% p.a.

21 If assumptions are correct, dugongs numbers on the urban coast of Qld in the local regions of the shark nets have declined to about 3% of their 1960 value Conclusion

22 Boat traffic? Net entanglements ? Habitat loss from terrestrial runoff ? But what caused the decline? Hunting ?

23 Impacts of Boats Disturbance interruption of normal daily behaviour (cumulative effects) displacement stress Two Potential Impacts: Boat strikes injury death

24 Results: Dugongs respond slowly - may be run over Dugongs usually move up to 300-400 m away and resume their original activity Greatest danger from boats is mortality not displacement Glow-slow zones + education and enforcement

25 Movements –>60 animals satellite tracked –most movements local –several animals made long-distance movements –longest movement ~600 km in few days

26 Movements of satellite- tracked dugongs –3 animals covered >80% of coast –1/3 moved >80km –1/6 moved >150km 1500km 400km Shoalwater  Bay Cooktown  Townsville 

27 Dugongs spend: >8 hours day feeding 72% of their time in less than 3m Dugong diving behaviour : 15 dugongs & 40,000 dives

28 Conclusions from studying dugong movements and diving Dugongs spend most of their time in shallow water –including intertidal region outside the GBRMP Dugongs move across jurisdictions within GBRWHA and between GBRWHA and adjacent areas Cross-jurisdictional initiatives essential

29 Basis for estimating sustainable human-induced mortality Maximum number of animals that may be removed sustainably from population = n min * 0.5 r max * recovery factor recovery factor= 0.5 for population of unknown status

30 Best estimate of current catch ~ 1000 dugong p.a. 316192123154 Absolute population estimate= 14100 + s.e. 2150 in December 2001 N min = 12300 Sustainable annual catch for Torres Strait Estimated for range of values for rate of increase

31 Conclusions The dugong harvest in Torres Strait is too high – same dugong stock as GBR Similar situation likely in some GBR dugong hunting communities Indigenous leaders support these conclusions and want greater and more meaningful involvement in management

32 How to address problem of over-harvest? Regulation of hunting at three levels: Indigenous communities GBR region across jurisdictions in northern Australia

33 Effects of GBRMP rezoning for dugongs Improves protection from – drowning in gill nets –physical disturbance to habitat especially from trawling

34 But….. Also need: –complementary zoning in adjacent intertidal areas –speed limits for boat traffic in ***** dugong habitats –protection of seagrass habitats from increased water turbidity and chemical pollution –regulation of hunting

35 Rezoning of GBRMPA very significant advance but additional initiatives essential, especially across jurisdictions Initiatives must reduce mortality and protect critical habitats Lessons for other marine wildlife

36 Thanks Funding AFMA ARC CRC Reef Research GBRMPA JCU Pew Foundation SWRRFI Contributions to the Research Amanda Hodgson Donna Kwan Ivan Lawler Tony Preen


Download ppt "The challenge of ‘Keeping It Great’ for marine wildlife."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google