Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Multinational Planning Augmentation Team

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Multinational Planning Augmentation Team"— Presentation transcript:

1 Multinational Planning Augmentation Team
(MPAT) Mission Analysis Purpose References Joint Publication 3-0, Doctrine for Joint Operations, Feb 1995 JP , Joint Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures for Foreign Humanitarian Assistance, 12 Dec 2000 JP 3-16, Joint Doctrine for Multinational Operations, April 2000 JP , Joint Task Force Planning Guidance and Procedures, 13 Jan 1999 Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff Manual , JTF Headquarters Master Training Guide, 15 Apr 1997 US-Thailand HQ and Staff Planning Standing Operating Procedures (SOP), 17 February 1998 Discuss techniques and procedures for conducting an operational level mission analysis for multinational operations 1. This module will cover mission analysis. 2. During mission analysis, we analyze the situation and the assigned mission, including assigned strategic military and political-military objectives, and related. 3. Mission analysis is an 11-step process. The result defines the operational problem and begins the process of determining feasible solutions, or courses of action. 4. This module is based largely on U.S. military doctrine. 5. These are the references used in developing this module. -First step of Commander’s Estimate process -Operational level (includes strategic military and politico-military objectives)

2 Crisis Action Planning Process
Situation Development II Crisis Assessment III Course of Action Development IV Course of Action Selection V Execution Planning OPORD & Deployment Data Base VI Execution And/or Warning Order Planning Order Alert Order Execute Order I Mission Analysis II Course of Action Development 1.The course of action development phase of crisis action planning implements national command authorities’ decision to develop military options for response to a crisis and for the CTF commander and staff, will usually begin upon receipt of the supported strategic commander’s warning order. This warning order will establish command relationships and identify the mission and any planning constraints. 2. Receipt of the warning order initiates the commander’s estimate process. As shown, mission analysis is the first step. It is perhaps the most important aspect of the commander’s estimate process, because it is the basis for all further planning. III Analysis of Opposing Courses of Action IV Comparison of Own Courses of Action V Commander’s Decision Commander’s Estimate Process

3 Mission Analysis Objectives
Common understanding of the problem Multinational force (MNF) or CTF restated mission Most probable & most challenging or dangerous potential change in the situation / Enemy COA (ECOA) Commander’s intent and guidance 1. The purpose of conducting an operational mission analysis is to understand the strategic and operational situations, the national command authorities, goals, the supported strategic commander’s intent and concept of operations, and to develop essential tasks and a clear multinational force mission statement. 2. At the conclusion of mission analysis, we will have achieved: 3. A common understanding of the problem, 4. The multinational force commander’s restated mission, 5. A determination of the most probable and challenging…or most dangerous potential change in the situation…. 6. And finally, commander’s intent and planning guidance for course of action development, based on the staff’s mission analysis. 

4 Mission Analysis Joint Planning Group
Personnel Air/Sea Lift Joint Intelligence Center Time Phased Force Deployment Data Information Operations Comms Core planning group Legal Fires 1. Now that we have defined mission analysis, lets look at who conducts it.  2. Leading, directing and managing a multinational force is a complex undertaking and at the operational level many organizations participate in the planning process. Therefore, the CTF commander, or CCTF, must organize his staff for planning in such a way that promotes sharing of information and facilitates an integrated planning effort by all involved. This includes all the distinctive functional staff sections, for example, logistics and intelligence, and supporting organizations. 3. The planning organization that conducts the operational mission analysis is the joint planning group, or CPG, and is usually directed by the C5, but could be the C3. The joint planning group includes representations from all staff functional areas and supporting organizations, as appropriate, to support the CTF commander’s decision-making with the most comprehensive analysis possible. This broad representation will also help ensure that the mission analysis supports the information requirements of all of those involved in the planning process. Special Operations Forces Engineer Logistics Psychological Operations Civil Affairs Component Liaison Officers Public Affairs

5 Task Steps Mission Analysis Determine the Facts Develop Assumptions
Analyze Mission & Intent Determine Limitations Determine Centers of Gravity Identify Tasks to be Performed Initial Force Structure Analysis Initial Risk Assessment Determine the End State Develop Mission Statement 1. These are the steps for conducting mission analysis. We will cover each of these during the remainder of this module. 2. Determine the facts. 3. Develop assumptions 4. Analyze mission and intent. 5.Determine limitations 6.Determine centers of gravity 7.Identify tasks to be performed 8.Conduct initial force structure analysis 9.Conduct initial risk assessment 10.Determine the end state 11.Develop mission statement 12. Conduct mission analysis brief Mission Analysis Mission Analysis Brief

6 Determine Known Facts, Current Status, or Conditions
Determine the Facts Develop Assumptions Analyze Mission & Intent Determine Limitations Determine Centers of Gravity Identify Tasks to be Performed Initial Force Structure Analysis Mission Analysis Brief Develop Mission Statement Initial Risk Assessment Determine the End State Initial Risk Assessment Determine the Facts Develop Assumptions Analyze Mission & Intent Determine Limitations Analysis Determine Centers of Gravity Identify Tasks to be Performed Initial Force Structure Mission Analysis Brief Develop Mission Statement Determine the End State Tasking from the national strategic command of the lead nation (HHQ) will normally include the following: Situation update Forces available for planning Time constraints Command relationships Can come in the form of a WARNING ORDER, ALERT ORDER, or PLANNING ORDER 1.The first step in mission analysis is to determine the facts: determine what the multinational force staff knows about the situation and the environment in which the multinational force will operate 2. All staff sections, C1 through C6, and special staff such as legal and medical, gather facts relevant to their functional areas. We will briefly discuss examples of information important to the different staff areas. 3. The staff will start with the tasking from the national command authorities or the supported strategic commander, which contains initial planning guidance. Mission Analysis

7 Determine Facts CTF Staff Example: Known Facts, Status, Conditions
Using all sources, identify significant and militarily relevant aspects of the environment and the situation Staff sections determine: Current status or condition Other known facts Monitor joint planning group (CPG) outputs Example: Known Facts, Status, Conditions Status as of 12 Nov 00 Dead 326 Injured 464 Missing 206 Affected 3M Homeless 460K Mt Canlaon Volcanic Activity Last event 3 Nov 3 plumes 15 km high; ash blowing west 300 km 97,000 people evacuated from Canloan & La Carlota Safe haven camp vicinity San Carlos f/ 100,000 Super Typhoon Julie Hit southern Philippines 10 Nov (Visayas, N. Mindanao) Negros - San Carlos camp (100K) loss of shelter 454,499 homeless 38 evacuation centers 1.The multinational force staff must use all available sources to determine the facts. Host nation government agencies and NGOs are especially important sources of information in humanitarian assistance and disaster relief contingencies. 2. The staff must also monitor the efforts of the Joint Planning Group. This is accomplished principally through their representatives to the CPG. 3. Based on a fictitious scenario, shown here are the known facts, status and existing conditions facing a Coalition Task Force (CTF).

8 Determine Facts C1-Personnel
Determine personnel status of forces Develop or implement personnel status reporting system CTF HQ staff augmentation requirements C2 / Coalition Intelligence Support Element (CISE) Define the operational environment Describe the effects of the environment on military operations Evaluate the threat (belligerents, disease, etc.) Develop or implement multinational intelligence sharing plan With CPG determine most challenging or dangerous potential change in the situation 1.This is the type of information the C1 needs to know: 2. At a minimum, the C1 needs to 3. Determine personnel status of forces 4.Develop or implement a personnel status reporting system 5. Determine the multinational force headquarters staff augmentation requirements. 5. The C2 has a great amount of information to gather and process. In addition to the list of items shown on this slide, other requirements include: 6. Analyze the CTF operations area, or AO. The CTF AO is an area of land, sea, and airspace defined by the strategic supported commander, in which the CTF commander conducts operations to accomplish the specific mission. 7. Conduct an intelligence preparation of the battlespace, and determine the status of friendly intelligence support 8. Develop the most likely and most challenging or dangerous potential change in the situation. In a humanitarian assistance operation, these might be due to changes in the weather, spread of disease, or the speed of CTF response to the crisis. In a situation involving combat operations, the C2 may develop the enemy’s or adversary’s most likely and most dangerous courses of action. In a peace enforcement operation, this may need to be done for more than one party of the conflict.

9 Determine Facts CPG C4-Logistics HHQ mission, intent, concepts
Forces available, readiness status Review lift priority and allocation Other organizations available Host nation’s / coalition governments’ political situation Host nation ability to respond Time analysis Logistical readiness of the force Availability of support and infrastructure in operations area Deployment estimates Host nation support (HNS) 1. The joint planning group is responsible for identifying the following information: a.      HHQ mission, intent, concepts b. Forces available, readiness status of CTF structure c. Lift priority and allocation d. Other organizations available, such as host nation governmental agencies and NGOs e. Host nation’s and other multinational force nations’ political situation f. Host nation ability to respond g. Time analysis 2. The last item, time analysis, is where many planners make mistakes 3. It is critical to balance the desire for detailed planning against the need for speed and, in certain situations, surprise in executing the mission. In time analysis, the CPG must: .First, determine time available. Second, understand the required time from beginning of planning to execution. Third, allocate the time necessary to complete all six steps in the commander’s estimate process. Finally, consider concurrent and collaborative planning between the CTF CPG, higher headquarters, CTF components; that is, the national contingents, and national military headquarters and other organizations providing support to the CTF.  4. The C4 examines the impact of the available infrastructure on the operation, and focuses on the availability of hard to obtain materials and services  5.Specific facts needed by the C4 include:  6. Logistical readiness of the national forces to be assigned to the CTF Availability of support and infrastructure in the area of operations, Deployment estimates Host nation support mechanisms, or agreements

10 Aerial Ports of Debarkation (APODs)
APOD Runway Maximum Fuel On-Site Capability on ground Storage Maintenance Palawan C-141 a/c a/c ,000 gal No Cebu C-5 a/c 6 a/c ,000 gal Yes City X City Y City Z 1. Planning for the deployment of the CTF to the AO is a critical C4 function. An analysis of the aerial ports of debarkation, or APODs, is necessary. 2. A similar overview on seaports of debarkation, or SPODs, should also be developed during mission analysis. 3. “MOG” is the acronym for maximum on ground and is used in logistics planning to refer to the maximum number of aircraft that can be on the ground at a particular APOD at the same time.

11 Time / Distance Factors
From To Distance Flight Time Steaming Time Okinawa Palawan Hawaii Palawan Bangkok Palawan Palawan Cebu Manila Palawan Manila Cebu 1. This graphic is a tool useful to the C4 in capturing data on time/distance factors, which is critical to the deployment estimate process. 2. As you can see so far, there is a lot of data collected during mission analysis, and it’s important that all information and products produced during this phase get captured for future use in the planning process.

12 C5-Plans and Policy Political considerations:
Determine Facts C5-Plans and Policy Political considerations: Over flight / basing rights Transient personnel staging Logistics support (facilities and HNS) Agreements in force (status of forces, treaties, etc.)  1. The C5- plans and policy- must look at political considerations at the operational level. These are extremely important issues and must be resolved early in the planning process. Key issues include:  2. Over flight and basing rights Transient personnel staging Logistics support 3. With a multinational force, the political sensitivities of all of the troop contributing nations must be considered.  4. In the absence of definitive policy directions from the national command authorities or higher headquarters, political considerations at the operational level may have to take the form of assumptions.  5. The C6 must examine various aspects of communication and information systems, the most important being interoperability. 6. What are the available communications and information systems? 7. What is the communications readiness of the available forces? 8. What are the communications requirements to link the elements of the CTF as well as linking with appropriate government, civilian, and NGO and PVO entities? 6.The C6 may also want to assess the impact of topography of the AO on CTF communications. C6-Communications Available communications resources Communications readiness of available forces Communications requirements

13 Determine Limitations
Assumption Determine the Facts Develop Assumptions Analyze Mission & Intent Determine Limitations Determine Centers of Gravity Identify Tasks to be Performed Initial Force Structure Analysis Mission Analysis Brief Develop Mission Statement Determine the End State Determine the Facts Develop Assumptions A supposition on the current situation, or a presupposition on the future course of events, either or both assumed to be true in the absence of positive proof, necessary to enable the commander, in the process of planning, to complete an estimate of the situation and make a decision on the course of action. Analyze Mission & Intent Determine Limitations Determine Centers of Gravity Identify Tasks to be Performed Initial Force Structure Analysis 1. The next step in the mission analysis process is to develop assumptions. 2. We began by collecting data and facts, things that we know, and we must now make assumptions to fill in the gaps in our facts, in order to allow planning to continue despite what we do not know. 3. An assumption is A supposition on the current situation, or a presupposition on the future course of events, either or both assumed to be true in the absence of positive proof, necessary to enable the commander, in the process of planning, to complete an estimate of the situation and make a decision on the course of action. 4. The key point to note is that the assumptions the CTF staff is concerned about are the only ones necessary in order for us to continue planning. Initial Risk Assessment Analysis Initial Risk Assessment Initial Risk Assessment Determine the End State Develop Mission Statement Mission Analysis Mission Analysis Brief

14 Example: Planning Assumptions
Develop Assumptions Replace missing or unknown facts in planning May cover Belligerent Situation Friendly Situation Success of supporting operations Environment Must be logical, realistic, and essential for planning to continue Never assume away belligerent capabilities Example: Planning Assumptions 1. Each staff section will probably have to develop assumptions focused on their functional areas 2. Here are some examples of assumptions, based on our Philippine disaster scenario. 3. Please note one important point: Assumptions made in planning must be revalidated or invalidated prior to execution. Therefore, they must be continuously monitored until they are proven to be facts or are overcome by events and are no longer relevant. Host country will allow temporary basing of Troop Contributing Nations (TCNs) APODs and sea ports of debarkation (SPODs) are operational TCNs are self-sustaining for first 72 hours Weather will remain favorable for duration of mission No other contingencies for USPACOM for duration of mission Host nation will be the CTF lead nation

15 Analyze HHQ Mission and Intent
Determine the Facts Determine the Facts Develop Assumptions Analyze Mission & Intent Determine Limitations Initial Risk Assessment Determine Centers of Gravity Identify Tasks to be Performed Initial Force Structure Analysis Mission Analysis Brief Develop Mission Statement Determine the End State Political end state HHQ mission, intent, and strategic military end state Define and analyze the operations area Identify tasks from outside the military National public statements National political influence: are there any limitations? International organizations (IO), non-governmental organizations (NGO), & regional organizations involved Contracts with private businesses Develop Assumptions Analyze Mission & Intent Determine Limitations Determine Centers of Gravity Identify Tasks to be Performed Initial Force Structure Analysis 1. The next step is to analyze higher headquarters’ mission and intent. 2. Understanding the political end state, higher headquarters mission and intent, and the strategic military end state, is critical to conducting a thorough mission analysis. 3. The joint planning group examines the initial warning order to determine these and the other information shown on this slide. 4. The core joint planning group will most likely perform this step, since the other members are busy gathering facts in their own areas of concern. 5. The object of this step is to glean all of the pertinent planning information; that is, guidance and instructions, from the warning order and other sources in order to ensure that all planners have the same understanding concerning the higher headquarters’ mission, intent, end state, and related information necessary for planning the operation.  6. It is important to ask for clarification from higher headquarters, if necessary. Initial Risk Assessment Analysis Initial Risk Assessment Determine the End State Develop Mission Statement Mission Analysis Mission Analysis Brief

16 Determine Limitations
Determine the Facts Determine the Facts Limitations placed on the CTF Constraints: Things the CTF must do Restraints: Things the CTF cannot do Imposed by higher headquarters Implied by conditions, circumstances Develop Assumptions Develop Assumptions Analyze Mission & Intent Analyze Mission & Intent Determine Limitations Determine Limitations Determine Centers of Gravity Determine Centers of Gravity Identify Tasks to be Performed Identify Tasks to be Performed Initial Force Structure Analysis Initial Force Structure Analysis 1. Next, determine limitations. Limitations affect the commander’s freedom of action. 2. The joint planning group identifies all limitations that will affect the staff’s planning. 3. Constraints are required actions that limit freedom of action; for example, deploy forces to the disaster-affected areas within a specified period of time. 4. Restraints are actions the multinational force is prohibited from taking; for example, the multinational force cannot deny the local media access to the areas in which it is rendering humanitarian assistance. Initial Risk Assessment Analysis Initial Risk Assessment Determine the End State Determine the End State Develop Mission Statement Develop Mission Statement Mission Analysis Mission Analysis Brief Mission Analysis Brief

17 Determine Centers of Gravity
Determine the Facts Determine the Facts Definition: Those characteristics, capabilities, or localities from which a military force derives its freedom of action, physical strength or will to fight. Analyze both threat and friendly centers of gravity Used as a tool to help determine strengths and weaknesses Some examples of friendly centers of gravity for HA / DR include: Airlift, speed of response, coalition cohesion Develop Assumptions Develop Assumptions Analyze Mission & Intent Analyze Mission & Intent Determine Limitations Determine Limitations Determine Centers Of Gravity Identify Tasks to be Performed Identify Tasks to be Performed Initial Force Structure Analysis Initial Force Structure Analysis  1. Determine centers of gravity. This step helps us identify friendly and threat strengths.  2. Threat centers of gravity are a key factor in development and analysis of friendly courses of action. For example, the Iraqi Republican Guards units were determined to be the enemy operational center of gravity during the Persian Gulf war. Destroying them was a way to reduce the Iraqi army’s freedom of action, physical strength and will to fight. In a disaster response scenario, the focus is on friendly courses of action, since the threat is not an opposing force, but rather, for example, the weather, time available, and disease. 3. Friendly centers of gravity are also key in our development and analysis of friendly courses of action. For example, cohesion of coalition partner nations may be a strength planners need to keep in mind so that it is not inadvertently undermined by a particular COA 4. In our present scenario, the operational center of gravity might be the capability of the CTF to rapidly deploy forces to the area of operation. Initial Risk Assessment Analysis Initial Risk Assessment Conduct Initial Risk Assessment Determine the End State Determine the End State Develop Mission Statement Develop Mission Statement Mission Analysis Mission Analysis Brief Mission Analysis Brief

18 Determine Limitations
Identify Tasks Determine the Facts Determine the Facts Develop Assumptions Develop Assumptions Specified -- Stated in the HHQ directive Implied -- Not stated, but necessary to do the mission Essential -- Of the above, those which must be done to achieve success Analyze Mission & Intent Analyze Mission & Intent Determine Limitations Determine Limitations Determine Centers of Gravity Determine Centers of Gravity Determine Centers of Gravity Identify Tasks to be Performed Identify Tasks to be Performed Initial Force Structure Analysis Initial Force Structure Analysis 1. Identify tasks. To identify tasks, the staff first lists all the specified tasks. These are usually stated in the higher headquarters’ warning order . 2. Next, develop implied tasks -- tasks that are not specifically assigned, but must be accomplished to perform the mission. These should not be inherent tasks; that is, actions staff or subordinate commands will do in accordance with standing operating procedures. 3. Finally, determine essential tasks -- from the first two categories, what are those tasks that are required to achieve the conditions that define success? Initial Risk Assessment Analysis Initial Risk Assessment Conduct Initial Risk Assessment Determine the End State Determine the End State Develop Mission Statement Develop Mission Statement Mission Analysis Mission Analysis Brief Mission Analysis Brief

19 Mission Analysis Worksheet
Tasks (1) Conduct needs assessment (2) Deploy forces (3) Provide HA/DR support to host nation Specified (1) Coordinate with NGOs & IOs (2) Provide force protection Implied (1) Deploy forces (2) Provide HA/DR support to host nation (3) Provide force protection 1. Here is an example of a worksheet that can be used to record the tasks as they are identified. Essential

20 Specified & Implied Tasks
TASK Army Navy AF USMC SOF x 1. Initial Assessment x 2. Coordinate w/ NGOs x 3. Port security 4. Provide security for camps x 5. Provide temporary shelter x x x 6. Provide ground transport 1.Every specified and implied task must be accomplished by a subordinate CTF organization, regardless of whether they are identified as essential tasks. Shown here is a matrix that is very useful for recording task assignments by type of forces. Another way to assign tasks is by national contingents in the CTF, and simply change the column headings of the matrix. 2 This list of tasks becomes the basis of tasks to subordinate units, when we start drafting the CTF operation order. 3. We also use this list to begin developing our time phased force deployment, or TPFDD document, that will show the deployment flow of the force over time. x 7. Distribute food & water x x 8. Provide air traffic control All specified and implied tasks should be assigned to a CTF component

21 Initial Force Structure Analysis
Determine the Facts Determine Centers of Gravity Determine the Facts Develop Assumptions Analyze Mission & Intent Determine Limitations Identify Tasks to be Performed Initial Force Structure Analysis Mission Analysis Brief Develop Mission Statement Conduct Initial Risk Assessment Determine the End State Determine Centers of Gravity Capabilities required to accomplish tasks? What non-traditional / non-military tasks can be performed by military forces? What coalition forces do we already have? What are the shortfalls? Develop Assumptions Analyze Mission & Intent Determine Limitations Determine Centers of Gravity Identify Tasks to be Performed Initial Force Structure Analysis 1. Next, determine what broad force capabilities are necessary to accomplish the essential tasks. For example, does the multinational force need forcible entry capabilities, say for peace operations? If this is a HA/DR contingency, does it need major engineer or medical capabilities? 2. The CTF commander uses this capabilities assessment to determine what forces he requires for execution, and compares these requirements against forces the coalition nations have made available. Ultimately, the CPG commander will need forces adequate to accomplish all specified and implied tasks the staff identified earlier. 3. Shortfalls, if any, must be addressed to higher headquarters. 4. A word of caution: This step is just an initial multinational force structure analysis. More specific requirements will be determined after the courses of action have been developed and analyzed! Initial Risk Assessment Analysis Initial Risk Assessment Determine the End State Develop Mission Statement Mission Analysis Mission Analysis Brief

22 Initial Risk Assessment
Determine the Facts Determine Centers of Gravity Determine the Facts Develop Assumptions Analyze Mission & Intent Determine Limitations Identify Tasks to be Performed Initial Force Structure Analysis Conduct Initial Risk Assessment Mission Analysis Brief Develop Mission Statement Determine the End State Determine Centers of Gravity Develop Assumptions What are the risks associated with the mission assigned by HHQ (looting, mission creep)? Do limitations, assigned tasks or assumptions create risk? What degree of risk is HHQ willing to accept? What can we do to minimize risk? Analyze Mission & Intent Determine Limitations Determine Centers of Gravity Identify Tasks to be Performed 1. The next, important step, is to conduct an initial risk assessment. Risk is defined as the “probability and severity of loss linked to hazards”. Thus, there are two components to risk assessment: first, what is the adverse impact on our operation of a certain event or situation, and second, what is the probability, or likelihood, of such an event occurring. Furthermore, what measures can we take to mitigate against, or minimize, the risk. In risk assessment, the staff determines the initial broad risks associated with the mission. 2. For example, in a peace enforcement operation, we might say a forward presence of large contingent of military forces most likely will provoke a negative response by certain elements of the local population. We determine that the negative response will be limited to a probable initiation of demonstrations targeted against the forces. We determine that the likelihood, or probability, of this event-demonstrations-is very high, but that the advantages to our forward presence far outweigh the potential adverse impacts. We also determine, that even if such an event occurs, the adverse impact to our mission is minimal. We can also take measures to safely mitigate against such actions, 3. Other potential risks to consider in our assessment may be the damage to civilian infrastructure, terrorist activities, the weather…or other aspects 3.a. Key questions the planners should ask are: What are the particular risks associated with the mission? Do limitations, assigned tasks, or assumptions create risk? What degree of risk is higher headquarters willing to accept? What can we do to minimize risk?  Initial Force Structure Analysis Initial Risk Assessment Analysis Initial Risk Assessment Determine the End State Develop Mission Statement Mission Analysis Mission Analysis Brief

23 Determine Limitations
Determine End State Review HHQ guidance Consider conditions for transition of the mission to nonmilitary organizations Consider conditions necessary to support the population once military operations terminate Specifically describe and record end state conditions Example HA / DR end state conditions: food distribution reestablished, refugee camps established, basic infrastructure restored Determine the Facts Determine Centers of Gravity Determine the Facts Develop Assumptions Analyze Mission & Intent Determine Limitations Identify Tasks to be Performed Initial Force Structure Analysis Conduct Initial Risk Assessment Determining the End State Mission Analysis Brief Develop Mission Statement Determine Centers of Gravity Develop Assumptions Analyze Mission & Intent Determine Limitations Determine Centers of Gravity Operational End State Identify Tasks to be Performed 1. Determine the desired end state. Higher headquarters may have provided guidance and focus for multinational task force operations in an intent statement, which may include strategic or operational implications, or both. 2. As basic principle, end state conditions must contribute to ultimate success of the operation. 3. Conditions to end armed conflict that apply to an enemy force, might include eliminating its ability to continue aggressive operations, command and control certain sized operations, and support or reinforce operations For a HA/DR, it may be a return to the pre-crisis situation; for example, basic public services:electrical power, sewage, & water distribution restored. 4. It is important understand the difference between preliminary end state conditions, often described as a military end state, and a broader set of end state conditions, when military force is no longer the principal means to attain the strategic ends. The broader end state typically involves returning to a state of peace and stability and may include a variety of diplomatic, economic, informational and military conditions. 5. Achieving the desired end state seldom, if ever, ends international efforts to protect interests in a situation. The term end state simply represents the set of conditions necessary to resolve a crisis and transition from predominant use of the military instrument of national power to other instruments. 6. In our example, desired end state for CoalitionTask Force BAYANIHAN is to restore the infrastructure and leave a mechanism in place to allow the host government to maximize its relief efforts. Specifically, the task force end state includes achieving these conditions: a.  Vital lines of communication adequate to alleviate human suffering reestablished. b.  Displaced persons camps prepared for turnover to the host Government. c. Systems to conduct search and rescue missions established. d. A robust system to continue the coordination of international HA projects established. Achieving the desired end state seldom, if ever, ends international efforts to protect interests in a situation. The term end state simply represents the set of conditions necessary to resolve a crisis and transition from predominant use of the military instrument of national power to other instruments. Initial Force Structure Analysis Initial Risk Assessment Analysis Initial Risk Assessment Determine the End State Develop Mission Statement Mission Analysis Brief Mission Analysis

24 Determine Limitations Example CTF Mission Statement
Restated Mission Who: CTF BAYANIHAN What: Essential tasks When: When directed by HHQ Where: Combined operations area Why: Operational end state Determine the Facts Determine Centers of Gravity Determine the Facts Develop Assumptions Analyze Mission & Intent Determine Limitations Identify Tasks to be Performed Initial Force Structure Analysis Conduct Initial Risk Assessment Determining the End State Develop Mission Statement Mission Analysis Brief Determine Centers of Gravity Develop Assumptions Analyze Mission & Intent Determine Limitations Determine Centers of Gravity Identify Tasks to be Performed Example CTF Mission Statement Initial Force Structure Analysis 1. From the list of essential tasks we develop a carefully crafted mission statement containing the who, what, when, where, and why for the operation 2. Remember, we are at the operational level and need to keep our re-stated mission at this level. 3. Here is an example mission statement for Task Force BAYANIHAN. It provides the five “Ws”- who, what, when, where, why. 4. After we have written the restated mission, it is time to present the staff’s mission analysis to the commander. When directed, CTF BAYANIHAN conducts humanitarian assistance operations in support of the Armed Forces of the Philippines in the affected areas of the central Philippines in order to alleviate human suffering and restore critical infrastructure. Initial Risk Assessment Analysis Initial Risk Assessment Determine the End State Develop Mission Statement Mission Analysis Brief Mission Analysis

25 Mission Analysis Brief
Determine Centers of Gravity Determine the Facts Develop Assumptions Analyze Mission & Intent Determine Limitations Identify Tasks to be Performed Initial Force Structure Analysis Mission Analysis Brief Conduct Initial Risk Assessment Determining the End State Develop Mission Statement Determine Centers of Gravity Determine the Facts Develop Assumptions Chief of Staff or C3 / C5 Analyze Mission & Intent Purpose and agenda Area of operations (Combined Operations Area) C2 Initial intelligence estimate Most probable future situation Most challenging / dangerous future situation Center of Gravity Analysis Determine Limitations Determine Centers of Gravity Identify Tasks to be Performed Initial Force Structure Analysis 1.The last step in mission analysis is the mission analysis brief. 2. The brief should contain all of the information developed up to this point. 3. This slide and the next two slides show an example of a mission analysis briefing format and proposed topics. The chief of staff or C3 or C5 representative starts the briefing. Initial Risk Assessment Analysis Initial Risk Assessment Determine the End State Develop Mission Statement Mission Analysis Mission Analysis Brief

26 Mission Analysis Brief
COS / C3 / C5 HHQ mission, intent & concept of operations Forces currently available (from all troop contributing nations) Assumptions Limitations - must do & cannot do Centers of gravity / decisive points - belligerent and friendly Tasks to be performed: Specified Implied Essential Initial CTF force structure analysis Risk assessment End state Proposed mission statement Time analysis - including projected planning milestones 1. The C3 and C5 present most of the information, developed during the mission analysis process.

27 Mission Analysis Brief
C1 C4 Others Facts, assumptions, conclusions Personnel actions Personnel services Other personnel related support Supply Services Health services Transportation Other Others as appropriate to the mission 1. The briefing concludes with presentations by the various staff sections, as required. 2. With the conclusion of the mission analysis briefing, the mission analysis step is complete. 3. Mission analysis is a lengthy, but necessary step in the commander’s estimate process that requires a trained, knowledgeable, and cohesive staff.

28 Mission Analysis End State
Common understanding of the problem and the mission CTF restated mission (in clear, simple terms) Most probable & most challenging or dangerous potential change in the situation Commander’s guidance & approval to continue planning 1. Remember, 2. The purpose of mission analysis is to develop a common understanding of the problem and the mission and 3. to prepare a multinational force restated mission in clear and simple terms 4. We will have determined the most probable and most challenging or dangerous potential change in the situation. 5. The commander’s guidance and approval are necessary to continue planning.

29 Crisis Action Planning Process
Situation Development II Crisis Assessment III Course of Action Development IV Course of Action Selection V Execution Planning OPORD & Deployment Data Base VI Execution And/or Warning Order Planning Order Alert Order Execute Order I Mission Analysis II Course of Action Development 1.The course of action development phase of crisis action planning implements national command authorities’ decision to develop military options for response to a crisis and for the CTF commander and staff, will usually begin upon receipt of the supported strategic commander’s warning order. This warning order will establish command relationships and identify the mission and any planning constraints. 2. Receipt of the warning order initiates the commander’s estimate process. As shown, mission analysis is the first step. It is perhaps the most important aspect of the commander’s estimate process, because it is the basis for all further planning. III Analysis of Opposing Courses of Action IV Comparison of Own Courses of Action V Commander’s Decision Commander’s Estimate Process

30 Task Steps Mission Analysis Determine the Facts Develop Assumptions
Analyze Mission & Intent Determine Limitations Determine Centers of Gravity Identify Tasks to be Performed Initial Force Structure Analysis Initial Risk Assessment Determine the End State Develop Mission Statement 1. Remember, Mission Analysis is an 11-step process. It starts with determining the facts. Each staff section develops the facts needed by the coalition/combined planning group (CPG) to begin the planning process. In the absence of facts, we must develop assumptions so that we can continue the planning process. Next, we must analyze and understand the higher headquarters, mission and intent. Constraints and restraints will most likely be imposed on our operation. We must determine these limitations and factor them into our analysis. 2. Determining friendly and threat centers of gravity helps us focus on our strengths, and the key strengths of the threat. Next, we must list specified tasks, develop implied tasks, and determine the essential tasks….that is, those tasks that are required to achieve mission success. Determining required capabilities, the initial force structure, and shortfalls is the next step. This is just a preliminary analysis, and will be followed by more detailed analysis after the courses of action have been developed and analyzed. Performing an initial risk assessment is important. Our risk analysis can greatly affect how we conduct our operation.   3. Based on higher headquarters guidance and other factors, we must determine the military operational level end state. Based on the foregoing steps, we then develop a mission statement for our multinational force. Finally, we brief our mission analysis to the multinational force commander. His approval and guidance is critical to continue planning. Mission Analysis Mission Analysis Brief

31 Questions? 1. Remember, 2. The purpose of mission analysis is to develop a common understanding of the problem and the mission and 3. to prepare a multinational force restated mission in clear and simple terms 4. We will have determined the most probable and most challenging or dangerous potential change in the situation. 5. The commander’s guidance and approval are necessary to continue planning.


Download ppt "Multinational Planning Augmentation Team"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google