1. THE HYDROGEOMORPHIC APPROACH TO FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT FOR PIEDMONT SLOPE WETLANDS B. Vasilas, UD; L. Vasilas, NRCS; M. Wilson, NRCS

2. Acknowledgements Funding provided by EPA, MDE, NRCS, ACOE, and FHA.

3. Outline Introduction to HGM Hydrology of slope wetlands Model variables

4. HGM Approach Procedure designed to assess the capacity of a wetland to perform functions. Functions: biological, chemical, and physical processes (e.g. water storage)

5. HGM Approach Wetland classification Site selection Model development –Identification/selection of functions –Data collection –Generate variables –Calibrate

6. Basic Assumption to HGM “…the highest, sustainable functional capacity is achieved in wetland ecosystems and landscapes that have not been subject to long-term anthropogenic disturbance.”

7. Reference Wetlands Data collection sites for model development Represent a range in anthropogenic disturbance

8. Reference Standard Wetlands Subset of reference wetlands Exhibit the least anthropogenic disturbance Represent the highest functional capacity

9. Model Development Variables Simple variables-presence of a surface flow outlet Complex variables-water chemistry Temporal variables-soil Eh

10. “User Friendly” Variables Visual or easily measured No temporal restrictions Correlated to a quantitative measure of an attribute

11. HGM Approach Function Process Attribute Variable Nutrient cycling Denitrification Organic carbon Leaf litter

12. Hydrologic Characteristics Hydrologic Source: Groundwater discharge –Toeslope seeps –Sideslope seeps Hydrodynamics –One directional (downslope) –Low-medium energy

13. Groundwater Driven High water quality Uniform inputs Buffered

14. Hydroperiod Classification Seasonally saturated Permanently saturated Permanently inundated

16. Retention Time Slope Surface roughness Connectivity

17. Piedmont Slope Functions Provide characteristic wildlife habitat Carbon export Temporary water storage Particulate retention Removal of pollutants Nutrient cycling

18. Hydrologic Source Variable Condition of catchment area –Size –Land use –Disturbance

19. Function: Nutrient Cycling Process: Microbial transformation Wetland attributes: –Hydrologic source condition –Organic carbon (energy) –Aerobic/anaerobic fluctuations

20. Function: Nutrient Cycling Variables: –Carbon (available vs. unavailable) Soil organic matter Woody debris Leaf litter Herbaceous groundcover (roots) –Aerobic/Anaerobic fluctuations Hydroperiod (temporal) Microtopography (spatial)

21. Hydroperiod Variables Soil –Presence/thickness of O horizons –Color/thickness of A horizons –Depth to redox features Plants –Species –Strata

22. Summary Piedmont slope wetlands show sig. variability in hydroperiods. Variability due to position of groundwater discharge sites; as opposed to disturbance. Variability sig. impacts functional capacity (esp. nutrient cycling).

24. Function: Temporary Water Storage Processes: Hydrologic inputs/outputs Attributes: –Hydrologic source condition –Slope –Surface area –Microtopography –Connectivity

25. Function: Removal of Pollutants Process: Sequestration Attributes: –SOM accretion –Plant biomass

26. Function: Removal of Pollutants Process: Sorption to soil particles Attributes: –Hydrologic source condition –Retention time –Infiltration –High cation exchange capacity

27. Funtion: Removal of Pollutants Variable: –Infiltration Slope Microtopography Herbaceous cover Soil porosity (texture) –CEC Organic matter content Clay content (texture)

28. HGM Model Development Reference domain: Reference standard sites

29. Functional Assessment Quantify the functional capacity of individual wetlands. Functional capacity: the degree to which a function is performed. Functional capacity is judged relative to a reference standard.

30. Functional Assessment-Why? Evaluation of wetland quality for Federal mandates Evaluation of anthropogenic impacts Evaluation for mitigation purposes (compensation “in kind”) Site selection for wetland enhancement Identification of environmentally-sensitive areas

31. Wetland Functions Definition: biological, chemical, and physical processes that occur in wetlands Examples –N removal through denitrification –Surface water storage –Soil organic matter accretion

32. Limitations Model development is labor intensive. Maximum index value limited by “pristine sites”.

33. Strengths Regionalized Specific to a subclass Attributes easily and quickly measured Surrounding land use considered

34. Surrounding Land Use Connectivity to other wetlands-wildlife Agricultural-sediment and nutrient loading Development-hydrologic inputs

36. HGM Functional Categories Hydrology Biogeochemical cycling Plant community Wildlife habitat

37. Water Variables Quantity Quality Residence time

38. Function: Carbon Export Processes: –Organic carbon production –Carbon transport (surface flow) Attributes: –Carbon production –Carbon transport

39. Function: Carbon Export Variables: –Carbon production Woody debris Leaf litter Herbaceous cover Soil organic matter –Carbon transport Slope Channelization Connectivity

40. Function: Particulate Retention Process: Sedimentation Physical Attributes: –  water –Retention time = ↓ water velocity Variables: –Slope –Surface roughness Microtopography Herbaceous cover