1. 1 DTE Experimentation in SEESIM12 Bi-Monthly Meeting 19 April 2012 NATO UNCLASSIFIED, Releasable to PfP

2. 22 AGENDA Exercise/Experiment Updates - Scenario Development Update (Mr. Andy Brown) - Experiment Management (LTC Eddie White) - Data Collection and Analysis Framework (Ms. Katie Hughes) - NTF Development/Integration (Ms. Amy Grom) Organizational/National Updates - JWC - U.S. J7/JCW - JFTC- M&S COE - NC3A- Croatia - Bulgaria AOB

3. 33 PARTICIPANTS  HQ SACT: JFT, OPEX, OA  JWC (Joint Warfare Centre)  JFTC (Joint Force Training Center)  U.S. J7/JCW (Joint Coalition Warfighting)  NC3A (NATO Consultation, Command and Control Agency)  M&S COE (Modeling and Simulation Center of Excellence)  Bulgaria  Croatia

4. 44  Scenario Development Update (Mr. Andy Brown)  Experiment Management (LTC Eddie White)  Data Collection and Analysis Framework (Ms. Katie Hughes)  NTF Development/Integration (Ms. Amy Grom) Exercise / Experiment Updates

5. 55 DTE Experiment “Organizational Chart”  Charts depict “communication lines”, not necessarily authority  E-mail via JEMM  Access to internet to support  Skype Voice/Video  ESRP for Collaboration  Battle Rhythm will be established to …  Complement Exercise Battle Rhythm  Facilitate routine communication  Ensure areas sufficiently covered

6. 66 DTE Experiment “Synchronization”

7. 77 DTE Experiment “NTF Management”

8. 88 DTE Experiment “Data Collection”

9. 99  Scenario Development Update (Mr. Andy Brown)  Experiment Management (LTC Eddie White)  Data Collection and Analysis Framework (Ms. Katie Hughes)  NTF Development/Integration (Ms. Amy Grom) Exercise / Experiment Updates

10. Data Collection Method Survey Interview Observable Research Identification of Who & What Actual Person/Observation Named Person Specific tool/process ‘Type’ Person/Observation NATO Participating Nations Collection Phase: Pre/During/Post Data Collection Development Information Domain ‘Type’ Questions/Observations Actual Questions/Observations CognitivePhysical Metrics: Qualitative/Likert/Binary/Measure DTE Experiment Objective Assess value of NATO participation in non-NATO led multi- national exercise from the perspective of NATO and nations. NATO Participation Via Test Cases JEMM ESRP NTF AIM: To provide insights to help determine NATO’s role in non-NATO led Multi- National exercises, in the context of the DTE program. MoE MoP Value Measures Supportable Utility UsefulnessBenefit Viability Feasibility Repeatability

11. 11 Data Collection and Analysis Framework … NATO UNCLASSIFIED, Releasable to PfP Means to ensure Aim/ Objectives in EDD are measurable and sufficiently addressed in DCAP EDD: Experiment Design Document DCAP: Data Collection and Analysis Plan

12. 12 Data Collection and Analysis Framework … NATO UNCLASSIFIED, Releasable to PfP … Ensure multiple factors considered and measured … Information, Cognitive and Physical Information, Cognitive and Physical domains

13. 13 Data Collection and Analysis Framework … Data Collection Method Survey Interview Observable Research Identification of Who & What Actual Person/Observation Named Person Specific tool/process ‘Type’ Person/Observation NATO Participating Nations Collection Phase: Pre/During/Post … A Guide to determine … Who to Ask What, When and How NATO UNCLASSIFIED, Releasable to PfP

14. 14 Exercise / Experiment Updates  Scenario Development Update (Mr. Andy Brown)  Experiment Management (LTC Eddie White)  Data Collection and Analysis Framework (Ms. Katie Hughes)  NTF Development/Integration (Ms. Amy Grom)

15. 15 Organizational/National Updates  JWC  JFTC  NC3A  U.S. J7/JCW  M&S COE  Croatia  Bulgaria

16. 16 AOB / Questions

17. 17 DTE in SEESIM12 OCT 15-19 2012 DTE in SEESIM12 Experiment Goals The aim of this set of experiments is to provide insights to help determine NATO’s role in non-NATO led Multi-National exercises, in the context of the Distributed Training and Exercises (DTE) programme Objective: Assess the value of having NATO, i.e. JWC, JFTC and NC3A participate in a non-NATO led multinational exercise, such as SEESIM12, from the perspective of NATO and participating nations * Will also inform CP107 (ETEE FS) requirements

18. 18 DTE in SEESIM12 OCT 15-19 2012 DTE in SEESIM12 Experiments - Assess the viability and utility of using the Joint Exercise Management Module (JEMM), in a non-NATO led multi-national exercise - Assess the viability and utility of using the NATO Training Federation (NTF), more specifically the Joint Theatre Level Simulation (JTLS) – Joint Conflict and Tactical Simulation (JCATS) Federation, in a non-NATO led multi-national exercise -Assess the utility of a collaboration tool such as the Exercise Scenario Resource Portal (ESRP) Discovery Type Experiments - seeks to introduce novel systems, concepts, organizational structures, technologies, or other elements to a setting where their use can be observed and catalogued

19. 19 DTE in SEESIM12 OCT 15-19 2012 DTE in SEESIM12 SMART Defence Diverse representation across multiple stakeholders Diverse representation across multiple stakeholders: In general includes NATO Organizations, Balkan Nations (both NATO and PfP), United States, and a Center of Excellence NTF Experiment has extensive collaboration and multiple national/organizational interests – Joint Warfare Centre… Joint Force Training Center … NATO Consultation, Command and Control Agency... U.S. J7/Joint Coalition Warfighting (Environment Development) Modelling & Simulation COE …Bulgaria … Croatia … Serbia NATO Training Federation experiment most directly addresses 2011 MCR

20. 20 DTE in SEESIM12 OCT 15-19 2012 DTE in SEESIM12 Outputs  Recommendations regarding potential for NATO to participate in multi-national exercises; particularly regarding JWC/JFTC’s ability to support via JEMM  Recommendation to Sustain, Terminate or Modify ESRP capability  Information regarding NATO interest in pursuing a federated NATO Training Federation capability, with associated resource implications  Information regarding CFBLNet constraints Complementary to national and organizational insights attained by participants