Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byEmery Tyler Modified over 9 years ago
1
2010 Guidelines 2010 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Osteoporosis in Canada Papaioannou A, et al. CMAJ 2010 Oct 12. [Epub ahead of print].
2
2010 Guidelines Fragility Fractures and Care Gaps 2010 Guidelines Section Two
3
2010 Guidelines Fragility Fracture: Definition A fracture occurring spontaneously or following minor trauma such as a fall from standing height or less 1,2 –Excluding craniofacial, hand, ankle and foot fractures 1.Kanis JA, et al. Osteoporos Int 2001; 12(5):417-427. 2.Bessette L, et al. Osteoporos Int 2008; 19:79-86.
4
2010 Guidelines The Majority of Fractures in Canadian Women > Age 50 Are Fragility Fractures Bessette L, et al. Osteoporos Int 2008; 19:79-86. % of all fractures that are fragility fractures 75.7% 91.8% Overall: 81% 95% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 60% 50-5960-6970-7980+ Age groups
5
2010 Guidelines Consequences of Fracture Increased risk of –Hospitalization/institutionalization 1,2 –Death 3-5Death –Subsequent fracture 6-8Subsequent fracture Decreased quality of life 9-12 Economic burden on healthcare system 2Economic burden on healthcare system 1. Papaioannou A, et al. Osteoporos Int 2001; 12(10):870-874. 2. Wiktorowicz ME, et al. Osteoporos Int 2001; 12(4):271-278. 3. Ioannidis G, et al. CMAJ 2009; 181(5):265-271. 4. Papaioannou A, et al. J SOGC 2000; 22(8):591-597. 5. Tosteson AN, et al. Osteoporos Int 2007; 18(11):1463-1472. 6. Papaioannou A, et al. J SOGC 2000; 22(8):591-597. 7. Colon-Emeric C, et al. Osteoporos Int 2003; 14:879-893. 8. Lindsay R, et al. JAMA 2001; 285:320-323. 9. Sawka AM, et al. Osteoporos Int 2005; 16:1836-1840. 10. Cranney A, et al. J Rheumatol 2005; 32(12):2393-2399. 11. Pasco JA, et al. Osteoporos Int 2005; 16(12):2046-2052. 12. Papaioannou A, et al. Osteoporos Int 2009; 20(5):703-715.
6
2010 Guidelines Impact on Function and Quality of Life Loss of confidence and fear of falling have been reported with all types of fractures < 40% of those who experience a hip fracture return to their prior walking abilities 1,2 Clinical fractures negatively affect self-care and mobility, and are associated with chronic pain 3Clinical fractures negatively affect self-care and mobility, and are associated with chronic pain 1. Cranney A, et al. J Rheumatol 2005; 32(12):2393-2399. 2. Pasco JA, et al. Osteoporos Int 2005; 16(12):2046-2052. 3. Papaioannou A, et al. Osteoporos Int 2009; 20(5):703-715.
7
2010 Guidelines Undertreatment of Osteoporosis Post Fracture in Women 1 1. Bessette L, et al. Osteoporos Int 2008; 19:79-86. 2. Papaioannou A, et al. Osteoporos Int 2008; 19(4):581-587. 3. Giangregorio L, Osteoporos Int 2009; 20(9):1471-8. 4. Austin PC, et al. CMAJ 2008; 179(9):901-908. This care gap is even wider in men and those who reside in long-term care 2,3in men A fracture is to osteoporosis what a heart attack is to cardiovascular disease. BUT... The treatment gap is far wider post fracture than post MI. 1,4The treatment gap is far wider post fracture than post MI
8
2010 Guidelines Looking Beyond BMD Currently, low BMD is the primary trigger for initiation of therapy 1-5... HOWEVER, Most fragility fractures occur in those with a BMD in the non-osteoporotic range (T-score higher than -2.5) 6Most fragility fractures occur in those with a BMD in the non-osteoporotic range There is a missed opportunity to prevent future fractures due to over-reliance on BMD. 6,7 1. Bessette L, et al. Osteoporos Int 2008; 19:79-86. 2. Papaioannou A, et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2004; 5:11. 3. Elliot-Gibson V, et al. Osteoporos Int 2004; 15:767-778. 4. Papaioannou A, et al. Osteoporos Int 2008; 19(4):581-587. 5. Cranney A, et al. Osteoporos Int 2009; 20(9):1621-1625. 6. Cranney A, et al. CMAJ 2007; 177(6):575-580. 7. Langsetmo L, et al. J Bone Miner Res 2009; 24(9):1515-1522.
9
2010 Guidelines Back-up Material Additional slides that can be accessed by hyperlinks on core slides Section Two – Fragility Fractures and Care Gaps
10
2010 Guidelines Fracture is a Predictor of Future Fractures The risk of experiencing another fracture in the year following a hip fracture*: 5% – 10% 1,2 The risk of experiencing another vertebral fracture in the year following a vertebral fracture † : 20% 3 Prevalent vertebral fractures also predict hip fracture* 4,5 40% of Canadians who experience a fracture have a history of prior fracture 6 1. Papaioannou A, et al. JOGC 2000; 22(8):591-597. 2. Colon-Emeric C, et al. Osteoporos Int 2003; 14:879-893. 3. Lindsay R, et al. JAMA 2001; 285:320-323. 4. Ismail AA, et al. Osteoporos Int 2001; 12(2):85-90. 5. Melton LJ 3rd, et al. Osteoporos Int 1999; 10(3):214-21. 6. Hajcsar EE, et al. CMAJ 2000, 163:819-822. Return to main presentation * in men and women † in postmenopausal women
11
2010 Guidelines One-year Mortality Risk after Hip Fracture 12 1. Ioannidis G, et al. CMAJ 2009; 181(5):265-271. 2. Papaioannou A, et al. J SOGC 2000; 22(8):591-597.
12
2010 Guidelines Increased Mortality Risk after Vertebral Fracture 1 2 Ioannidis G, et al. CMAJ 2009; 181(5):265-271. Return to main presentation
13
2010 Guidelines HUI3 Deficits Associated with Fractures in Women, by Fracture Type Return to main presentation Papaioannou A, et al. Osteoporos Int 2009; 20(5):703-14. Multi (HUI2) 0 -0.05 -0.1 -0.15 -0.2 -0.25 Mobility (HUI2) Pain (HUI2) Self-care (HUI2) Multi (HUI3) Ambulation (HUI3) Pain (HUI3) OtherRibSpineHip
14
2010 Guidelines Increasing Costs Associated with Hip Fracture ($CDN) Return to main presentation Wiktorowicz ME, et al. Osteoporos Int 2001; 12(4):271-278.
15
2010 Guidelines Therapeutic Care Gap: Most Men Do Not Receive Treatment for Osteoporosis after Fracture Return to main presentation Papaioannou A, et al. Osteoporos Int 2008; 19(4):581-587.
16
2010 Guidelines Post-fracture Care Gap: Comparison with Heart Attack 1. Bessette L, et al. Osteoporos Int 2008; 19:79-86. 2. Austin PC, et al. CMAJ 2008; 179(9):901-908. Return to main presentation
17
2010 Guidelines No. of fractures 0 100 200 300 400 500 Most Fragility Fractures in Postmenopausal Women Occur with Low Bone Mass ("Osteopenia") Return to main presentation Cranney A, et al. CMAJ 2007; 177(6):575-580. > 0.00.0 to -0.5 -0.5 to -1.0 -1.0 to -1.5 -1.5 to -2.0 -2.0 to -2.5 -2.5 to -3.0 -3.0 to -3.5 ≤ -3.5 NormalOsteo- penia Osteo- porosis WHO categoryT-score 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Fracture rate Fracture rate, per 1000 person-years There is a missed opportunity to prevent fractures due to over-reliance on BMD.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.