1. IMPACT Survey

2. Survey Results 198 Schools 81.5% participated SW RegionNW RegionSC RegionNC Region SE RegionNE Region BuncombeAsheAnsonChapel HillCravenCurrituck BurkeCaldwellCabarrusChatmanDuplin Edenton- Chowan MaconDavidsonClevelandGuilfordJonesPerquimans Swain Thomasville CityCumberland Nash-Rocky MountLenoir Transylvania RobesonOrangePamlico Yancey UnionWakePender Wayne Wilson

3. Student Population 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60 60% 100-300300-500500-700above 700

4. Personnel Instructional Technology Facilitator 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% Full timePart TimeNo

5. Personnel Media Assistants 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Full TimePart TimeNo

6. Funding for Instructional Technology Facilitator Funding 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% FederalStateLocalTitle One State, Local Teacher allocation FederalStateLocalTitle One Combine and Federal State, Local Teacher allocation

7. Funding for Media Assistant Funding of Media Assistant 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% FederalStateLocalCombine State and Local

8. Ideas for Flexibility Ways to be Flexible 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% Use Teacher Assistants or Tutors VolunteersIncrease Specials Rotation Decrease Specials Rotations Add Guidance to Rotation Use Classroom Teacher Assistants

9. Collaborative Planning Planning Time 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 1 hour a week1 hour a month1 hour each 9 weeks 1/2 day each 9 weeks Grade Level Meetings, when necessary no established time

10. Elephant in the Living Room Obstacles 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% Adequate Personnel Creating Teacher Buy-in SchedulingFundingAdministrative Support

11. Change can be difficult Teacher Buy In Adequate Personnel –Media Coordinator –Media Assistant –Instructional Technology Facilitator Collaborative Planning is key Scheduling IMPACT