1. By Alex Correa, Stephanie Lau, Jason Marder, Lindsay Rosenstein, and Jesse Torchetti The Beer Industry 1

2. Agenda  Choice of Industry  Industry Structure  Competitive Landscape  Survey  Regulation  Pricing Strategies  Analysis and Recommendation 2

3. WHY THE BEER INDUSTRY?  Relevant topic for college students  Active purchasers and consumers  Undergoing major transformations  Mergers and Acquisitions  Perfect example for price examination 3

4. Industry Structure 4

5. Industry at a Glance Revenue:Growth 07-12Growth 12-17 $156.5 BN1.8%3.64% WagesEmploymentEnterprises $9.7 BN472,5935,216 5 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

6. Supply Chain Outsource non-core functions: logistics, warehousing Raw Materials BrewingDistributionEnd User 6 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

7. Production Global Beer Manufacturing AlcoholicLow MaltNo MaltNon-alcoholic 7 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

8. Main products 8 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

9. Sales via Market Segments- Globally 9 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

10. International Trade 10 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|  6.3% of industry revenue in 2011  Exports  medium and increasing  Imports  medium and increasing  Demand in developed and emerging markets for premium beers not produced in home country  Differences in taste preferences

11. Cost Structure Purchases 35% Sales & Distribution 23.4% Wages 6.5% Depreciation 4.1% Utilities 1.5% Other 18.1% 11 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

12. Looking at the Global Scale CountryConsumption (L) Per Capita Czech Republic160 Ireland127 Germany109 Austria105 Belgium98 UK95 Denmark92 Slovakia92 Australia87 Venezuela83 12 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

13. Revenue Performance Rev. ($MM) 13 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

14. Industry – At a Closer Look 14 Y-O-Y % chang e |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

15. Industry – At a Closer Look 15 Y-O-Y % chang e |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

16. Industry – At a Closer Look 16 Y-O-Y % chang e |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

17. Industry – At a Closer Look 17 Y-O-Y % chang e |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

18. Industry – At a Closer Look 18 Y-O-Y % chang e |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

19. Drivers of the Market  Age Group (15-34)  Downstream Demand- Drinking Places  Taxes and Duties on Substitutes  Per Capita Disposable Income  World Price of Aluminum 19 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

20. Competitive Landscape 20

21. Competition with other Industries 21 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

22. Decline Stage of its Life Cycle  Value added growth is below global GDP growth  Enterprise numbers are declining  M&A  Only moderate technological advances  Static per capita consumption 22 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

23. Operating Conditions- Global  HIGH level of capital intensity  MEDIUM level of technology change  MEDIUM volatility of industry revenue  MEDIUM level of regulation  Predicted to increase  MEDIUM level of industry assistance  No tariffs 23 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

24. Barriers to Entry  High sunk cost and capital requirements.  Tight control over distribution channels by existing players.  High levels of brand loyalty. HIGH and STEADY 24 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

25. Major Players 25

26. Global Market Share 26 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

27. Industry Concentration 27 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players| CompanyProportion of Total Industry Revenue Anheuser-Busch InBev.188 SABMiller plc.185 Heineken N.V..092 Carlsberg A/S.058 Molson Coors Brewing Co..025 Asahi Breweries.03 Kirin Group.025 Other.412 BUT

28. Anheuser-Busch InBev Year Revenue (BN$) Growth (%) EBIT (BN$) Growth (%) 200823.64.6%7.3N/C 200933.943.6%9.631.5% 201036.371.0%11.216.7% 20113974.0%12.612.5%  Brands: Beck’s, Brahma, Hoegaarden, Leffe, Skol, Stella Artois, Tennents, Budweiser  InBev acquired Anheuser-Busch in 2008   World’s largest brewer 28 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

29. SABMiller plc  Brands: Amstel Lager, Castle, Miller Genuine Draft, Miller Lite, Pilsner Lite, Nastro Azzurro, Pilner Urquell  South African Breweries acquired Miller Brewing Co. in 2002 Year Revenue (MM$) Growth (%) EBIT (MM$) Growth (%) 20082141015326473.3 20092530218.2421929.3 2010263504.143813.8 2011283117.4504415.1 29 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

30. Heineken N.V.  Brands: Heineken, Amstel, Murphy’s, Sagres, Maes, Birra Moretti, Cruzcampo, Ochota  Sells more than 200 international premium, regional, local, and specialty beers and ciders Year Revenue (MM$) Growth (%) EBIT (MM$) Growth (%) 20082094435.7305.7-80 200920445-2.41415.8363.1 2010224249.71625.314.8 2011237926.11743.27.3 30 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

31. Carlsberg A/S  Brands: Carlsberg, Baltika, Elephant, Holsten, Okocim, Kronenbourg, Tuborg  Several smaller brands within limited geographic regions Year Revenue (MM$) Growth (%) EBIT (MM$) Growth (%) 2008117593.5592.2-63.5 200911090.6-5.71198102.3 201011224.21.2181951.8 2011117593.5592.2-63.5 31 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

32. Survey 32

33. Sample Size  145 Respondents  42 % Male; 58% Female  Graduating year  26% in 2012  24% in 2013  31% in 2014  19% in 2015 33 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

34. How often do you purchase beer? 34 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players| 47%

35. How many people do you generally purchase beer for? 35 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

36. Where do you buy beer? 36 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

37. What brand of beer do you buy most often? 37 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

38. Shopping for Beer in Ithaca 38 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

39. How do you decide what type of beer to buy? 39 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players| 72%

40. Other Reasons for Beer Choices 40  “Habit”  “Depends if I’m buying for a group or simple enjoyment. blue moon for just myself coors / keystone for parties.”  “ COUPONS”  “Tradition”  “It’s what my friends get” |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

41. Take a Look: Collegetown vs. Ithaca  Collegetown  Jason’s  Wilson Farms  Ithaca  Wegman’s  Tops 41 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

42. Shopping for Beer in Ithaca 42 Proximity Comparison- Wegmans and Tops |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

43. Shopping for Beer in Collegetown 43 Proximity Comparison- Jasons and Wilson Farms |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

44. Regional Pricing  Prices vary between urban and rural areas and within broad US regions  Lower prices are found in neighborhoods with low to moderate income  In general: The larger the store, the lower the beer prices 44 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

45. Regulatory Framework 45

46. Regulations - Distribution  3 tier system mandated by government 46 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

47. Regulations – U.S. HEAVY and STEADY  Vary from State to State  Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco Firearms and Explosives (ATF)  Interstate movement of alcohol regulations  Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) 47 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

48. Regulations - Taxes  Federal excise tax  $18/barrel (31 gallons)  NY State excise tax  $3.72/barrel  NYC excise tax  $4.34/barrel 48 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players| $26.06 per barrel 84.1¢ per gallon 8¢ per 12 oz. can or bottle

49. 49

50. Pricing Strategies 50

51. Main Pricing Strategies  Tacit Collusion  Advertising (point of purchase discounting)  2 nd Degree Price Discrimination:  Versioning (premium, import, discount)  Volume - Based  Regional pricing  Long-tail/Niche Market 51 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

52. Tacit Collusion  A spontaneous cooperation resulting from strongly perceived interdependence  Seen in beer industry through price matching 52 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

53. Tacit Collusion  Requires lack of significant product differentiation and similar production costs 53 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

54. Tacit Collusion 54 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

55. Oligopoly Successful collusion requires a small amount of firms in the market. 55 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

56. Tacit Collusion  These three giants are known to simultaneously raise and lower prices  In the last year domestic sub-premium brands had an average increase in price of $0.51/case  Domestic premium brands’ prices have increased $0.27/case Source: BevIndustry 2011: Another year of trading places in beer 56 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

57. Advertising  Point of Purchase advertising can be found in 90% of stores that sell beer  Promoted sales are seasonal (Q2 & Q3)  Larger volume packages are associated with higher promotion 57 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

58. Second Degree Price Discrimination  Create versions of a product to appeal to different types of buyers  Key constraint: the inexpensive version cannot be too attractive to those willing to pay more 58 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

59. Second Degree Price Discrimination  Versioning:  Premium & sub-premium brands  Trading up vs. trading down  Induce customers to select into high and low price groups themselves  The self selection process forces consumers to reveal their true types 59 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

60. Versioning  Immense bifurcation in beer industry  Super premium and sub-premium growth  Allows consumers to self-select and reveal true willingness to pay  Large difference in prices within brand categories (i.e. Budweiser Premium vs. Bud Light) 60 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

61. Versioning Sub-premium 30-packs sales up 18.2% YoY 18-packs sales up 35.5% YoY Super premium 30-packs sales up 6.4% YoY 36-packs sales up 15.8% YoY 61 Source: Fuhrman, 2010 Beer Report: Sub- premium, crafts lead the way |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

62. Versioning  Emergence of sub-premium brands attributable to:  State of the economy  Effective and memorable advertising “Keith Stone”  Sub-premium availability in bulk 62 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

63. Impact of Versioning on Prices 63 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

64. Variety of Bud 64 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

65. Second Degree Price Discrimination  Volume-based or Bulk pricing  Buy more volume  Pay less per unit  Enables large quantities to be sold for more “attractive” prices 65 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

66. Volume – Based/Bulk Pricing  Discount from buying 12-pack over 6-pack is 7.5% per oz.  Discount from buying 24-pack over 12-pack is 14.8% per oz. Source: Bray, Loomis, and Engelen, 2008: You Save Money When You Buy in Bulk: Does Volume-Based Pricing Cause People to Buy More Beer? 66 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

67. Looking at Packaging and Price 67 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players| Bud Light Lime, Bud Light Platinum

68. Own Price Elasticity  Pricing is so important in this industry because beer is incredibly elastic.  Price elasticity of demand for:  6-pack: -5.07  12-pack: -5.008  24-pack: -4.543 68 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

69. Cross-Price Elasticity 72 oz.144 oz.288 oz. 72 oz.-5.071.9020.406 144 oz.1.173-5.0081.496 288 oz.1.2320.244-4.543 Source: Bray, Loomis, and Engelen, 2008: You Save Money When You Buy in Bulk: Does Volume-Based Pricing Cause People to Buy More Beer? 69 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

70. Long-tail/Niche Market  Emergence of craft beers  Struggle of imports  Rise of the Private Label 70 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

71. Long-tail/Niche Market  Emergence of craft beers  Craft sales up 12%  6-pack sales up 9% YoY  12-pack sales up 11% YoY  More than 2,000 craft breweries in operation in US 71 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

72. Long-tail/Niche Market  Struggle of imports sector in US  High-end market being taken over by craft beers and domestic super premiums  Corona sales down 8%, Heineken down 11%  Dos equis breaking the mold Dos equis breaking the mold 72 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

73. Long-tail/Niche Market  Private Label  7-Eleven’s Game Day Beer  Walgreens’ Big Flats 1901  Supervalu’s Buck Range Light  Cost consciousness continues to be a consumer trend 73 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

74. Pricing Strategies Tacit Collusion Advertising (point of purchase discounting) 2 nd Degree Price Discrimination Long-tail/Niche Market 74 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| |Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

75. Recommendations 75

76. Recommendations 76  Greater opportunity for retailer partnerships  Increase promotions of craft beers  Target untapped markets  Women  Elderly  Advertise as a way of life, integral part of culture  Find ways to further differentiate

77. Trends for the Future  Focus on emerging markets  Consolidation  Product differentiation  Retailers and Private labels  Taxation and Regulation 77 |Industry Structure| |Competitive Landscape| |Regulation| | Pricing Strategies| |Analysis and Recommendation| |Survey| |Major Players|

78. Questions? 78