Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Management of cancer cachexia. Cancer cachexia Anorexia, chronic nausea, asthenia, psychological stress. Poor survival and decreased tolerance to both.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Management of cancer cachexia. Cancer cachexia Anorexia, chronic nausea, asthenia, psychological stress. Poor survival and decreased tolerance to both."— Presentation transcript:

1 Management of cancer cachexia

2 Cancer cachexia Anorexia, chronic nausea, asthenia, psychological stress. Poor survival and decreased tolerance to both radiotherapy and chemotherapy. No evidence : nutritional or pharmacological intervention improve survival. Exception : GI obstruction from malignancy. Lancet Oncolo 2000;1:138-47

3 Goals Ideal : reverse syndrome completely  eliminate tumor mass  impossible Reasonable :  Improving general comfort.  Relieving of symptoms : anorexia, nausea, asthenia.  Improve level of functioning. Lancet Oncolo 2000;1:138-47

4 Management approach Nutrition Pharmacological intervention Psychological and behavioral therapy Lancet Oncolo 2000;1:138-47

5 Nutrition Nutritional counseling improve the daily caloric intake. Maximize oral intake by allowing the patient flexibility in type, quantity and timing if meals. Disease progresses  decrease nutritional support. Adequate mouth care and small amount of ice chips or sips of cold beverages may be adequate In dehydration : use hypodermoclysis Lancet Oncolo 2000;1:138-47

6 ESPEN guideline 2006

7 Hypodermoclysis A family member can do hypodermoclysis at home after one lesson from the doctor Using hypodermoclysis, a family member can give the sick person about 90 ounces of fluid a day by giving 45 ounces of fluid in two different places. American Family Physician Nov 1,2001

8 Pharmacological interventions Main purpose :  Anorexia  Chronic nausea Not affect psychological distress from a negative body image : no weight gain. Lancet Oncolo 2000;1:138-47

9 Pharmacological interventions Proven efficacy  Corticosteroid  Progesterone  Metoclopramide No proven efficacy  Cyproheptadine  Hydrazine sulphate  Thalidomide  Melatonin  B2-agonist  Anabolic steroid  GH  Cannabinoid  NSAIDs  Eicosapentanoic acid(EPA)  Branched chain amino acid Lancet Oncolo 2000;1:138-47

10 CA Cancer J Clin 2002;52:72-91

11 Corticosteroid Mechanism  Inhibition of synthesis and/or release of proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α,IL-1), anorexigenic mediators(leptin, CRF, serotonin)  Enhance NPY levels in hypothalamus. X X Lancet Oncolo 2000;1:138-47

12 Corticosteroid Improving appetite, food intake, sensation of well-being, performance status. No significant weight gain. Dose : 20-40 mg of prednisolone Risk : peptic ulcer, etc. Lancet Oncolo 2000;1:138-47

13 Progesterone Mechanism  Stimulate NPY in the hypothalamus  Modulation of Ca channel in VMH(satiety center)  Inhibition of proinflammatory cytokines X X Lancet Oncolo 2000;1:138-47

14 Progesterone Improve appetite, caloric intake, sensation of well- being. Significant weight gain (mostly fat). Dose : megestrol acetate 160-1600 mg, optimum dose : 800 mg Response can be seen in 1 week. Risk : thromboembolism, breakthrough bleeding, peripheral edema, hyperglycemia, hypertension, Cushing syndrome, alopecia, adrenal insufficiency. Lancet Oncolo 2000;1:138-47

15 Metoclopramide Mechanism  Antidopaminergic drug  Central antiemetic  Gastroprokinetic : improve gastric emptying X X Lancet Oncolo 2000;1:138-47

16 Metoclopramide Improve in appetite, food intake. Dose : 10 mg before meals and bedtime. Risk : minimal Lancet Oncolo 2000;1:138-47

17 Cyproheptadine Mechanism  Antiserotoninergic RCT  mild increase appetite, food intake.  No weight gain. Risk : sedation X Lancet Oncolo 2000;1:138-47

18 Hydrazine sulphate Mechanism  Inhibit gluconeogenesis Pilot study  improve appetite and nutritional status.  No weight gain. Substantial side effects and deterioration of QOL scales X Lancet Oncolo 2000;1:138-47

19 Thalidomide Mechanism  Inhibit production of TNF-α Pilot study  Improve appetitie, well- being, nausea, insomnia X Lancet Oncolo 2000;1:138-47

20 Melatonin Mechanism  Decrease circulating concentration of TNF-α Preliminary studies  Weight loss > 10% fewer than best supportive care X Lancet Oncolo 2000;1:138-47

21 Beta-adrenoreceptor agonist Clenbuterol Mechanism  Decrease protein catabolism. Positive effect on muscle mass in tumor- bearing rats. Risk : nervousness, tachycardia, tremor, headache. X Lancet Oncolo 2000;1:138-47

22 Anabolic steroid Mechanism  Decrease protein catabolism RCT  Less effective than dexamethasone/megest rol acetate in appetite and nutritional variables. X Lancet Oncolo 2000;1:138-47

23 Growth hormone Mechanism  Stimulate muscle protein synthesis. No trial in cancer cachexia. X Lancet Oncolo 2000;1:138-47

24 Cannabinoid Mechanism  Stimulate appetite No trial in cancer cachexia. Risk : somnolence, confusion, perceptual disturbance. X Lancet Oncolo 2000;1:138-47

25 NSAIDs Mechanism  Inhibit the production of cytokine  Stimulate appetite Preliminary studies : Ibuprofen  Weight gain  Decrease production of CRP X X Lancet Oncolo 2000;1:138-47

26 EPA(Eicosapentanoic acid) Omega 3 fatty acid Mechanism  Inhibition of lipolysis and muscle protein degradation  Eicosapentanoic acid decrease production of IL-6 RCT : controversy in efficacy X X X Lancet Oncolo 2000;1:138-47

27 Psychological and behavioral therapy Multidisciplinary approach  Oncologist  Nurses  Dieticians  Patient and family Secondary depression. Relaxation, hypnosis, group psychotherapy. Lancet Oncolo 2000;1:138-47

28 Thank you


Download ppt "Management of cancer cachexia. Cancer cachexia Anorexia, chronic nausea, asthenia, psychological stress. Poor survival and decreased tolerance to both."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google