1. PFMRP Phase IV Brief Overview  PEFA, other diagnostic reports along with the CAG and PAC reports provided the frame of reference for development of PHASE IV of PFM reform program.  The strategy and the supporting M&E framework has been organized under five KEY RESULTS AREAs each of which target specific PFM challenges and/or areas of weakness.  The M&E framework has been developed with milestones under each KRA that monitor the results produced.  DPs have organized their participation with DP leads established for each of the 5 KRAs. This is expected to enhance collaboration between DPs and GoT counter parts.

2. PFMRP Phase IV Key Results Areas  KRA 1 Revenue Management  policy development, projection, collection and administration  Output 1.1: Improved quality of forecasting of fiscal aggregates for three years on a rolling basis  Output 1.2: The Government improves efficiency in domestic revenue mobilization both at the policy and the administration levels by updating legal instruments towards international best practices  Output 1.3: Strengthened capacity of local government authorities to collect revenue by 2015  Output 1.4: Increase of donor funding that flows through the exchequer system by 2016

3. KRA 1 Output 1.1

4. PFMRP Phase IV Key Results Areas  KRA 2- Budgeting and Planning  capacity development and systems enhancements.  Output 2.1: Strengthened capacity of MDAs, RSs and LGAs in implementing program based budgeting by June 2016.  Output 2.2: Increased effective utilization of Planning and budgeting tools by 2016  Output 2.3: Strengthened capacity of LGAs for MTEF preparation by 2015

5. PFMRP Phase IV Key Results Areas  KRA 3 Budget Execution, Accountability and Transparency  cash management, debt management, transition to full accrual accounting, fixed asset management, procurement policy, management, and financial reporting.  Output 3.1: Improved public procurement performance by PEs by 2015  Output 3.2: Strengthened public sector procurement by June 2015  Output 3.3: Strengthened capacity of MDAs, RSs and LGAs in Cash management by 2015  Output 3.4: Strengthened public debt management capacity by 2015  Output 3.5: Improved integrity and content of government financial statements and the migration from IPSAS cash to IPSAS accrual accounting for all government accounts is progressing in accordance with plans.  Output 3.6: Improved accountability in management of Government Assets for supporting migration to IPSAS Accrual

6. PFMRP Phase IV Key Results Areas  KRA 4 Budget Control and Oversight.  Focus on Internal Audit Department, PPRA, CAG / NAO and the TRA.  Output 4.1: Increased coverage and quality of the internal audit functions by 2016  Output 4.2: Strengthened External audit functions by 2016  Output 4.3: Improved transparency on audit reports (central, local and parastatal levels) to strengthen scrutiny and accountability.  Output 4.4: Improved performance of parastatals by June 2016.  Output 4.5: Strengthened capacity of oversight functions of Parliamentary Accounts Committee in Tanzania Mainland

7. PFMRP Phase IV Key Results Areas  KRA 5 Change Management  Utilization and Coordination of ICT systems, improved access to public information, management capacity, coordination and collaboration between PFM actors.  Output 5.1: Coordinate Integration, interfacing and rationalization of Government financial systems.  Output 5.2: Utilization of EPICOR modules Increased from seven to ten  Output 5.3: All software development and module upgrades are coordinated with the overarching plans for ICT integration.  Output 5.4: Improved communication and public access to key fiscal information to stakeholders  Output 5.5: Coordination and Standardization of PFM Training Achieved.  Output 5.6: PFMRP component Managers are being guided by detailed multi-year operating plans.

8. PFMRP Phase IV Key Results Areas  KRA 5 Change Management  Utilization and Coordination of ICT systems, improved access to public information, management capacity, coordination and collaboration between PFM actors.  Output 5.7: PFM activities are effectively planned and implemented  Output 5.8: Effective coordination of activities and support provided to the program implementers  Output 5.9: PFM Program oversight and review is being guided by clearly defined Milestones derived from an agreed M&E framework,  Output 5.10: All major PFM reforms have been coordinated with and informed by the relevant government and DP stakeholder groups  Output 5.11: PFMRP implemented efficiently and effectively through result based management approach.  Output 5.12: National systems and processes for intergovernmental transfers to LGAs Streamlined and rationalized

9. KRA 5 Output 1.1

10. PFMRP Phase IV Overview  High Impact Initiatives  Revenue forecasting and mobilization  ICT Systems integration with continued roll out of automation.  Transition to IPSAS Accrual Accounting.  Creation of an effective Debt Management Unit and Systems  Improved Government Cash Management Systems  Development of the Internal Auditor General Division and function at all levels of Gov’t  LGA Fund Flow architecture