Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Foveal cones are about 2.4 μm in diameter (0.7 min of arc) Peripheral cones are about 5.8 μm in diameter (1.7 min of arc)

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Foveal cones are about 2.4 μm in diameter (0.7 min of arc) Peripheral cones are about 5.8 μm in diameter (1.7 min of arc)"— Presentation transcript:

1

2 Foveal cones are about 2.4 μm in diameter (0.7 min of arc) Peripheral cones are about 5.8 μm in diameter (1.7 min of arc)

3

4

5

6 Ganglion cells

7

8 Claim that ganglion cells are not photosensitive. (But, recall Pritchard.) Ganglions cells fire action potentials, where photoreceptors use graded potentials.

9 Ganglion cells ~ 1.25 million ganglion cells 10-15 types of RGC ~ 100 million rods ~ 5 million cones Recall that, in photoreceptors, more light means less electrical current.

10

11 Ganglion cells are responsive only to limited areas of the visual field; they have limited receptive fields. Ganglion cells can be ON-center with an OFF-surround. Ganglion cells can be OFF-center with an ON-surround.

12 Lateral Inhibition Stimuli in the surround suppresses activity in the center. In other words, surround stimuli are antagonistic to center stimuli.

13

14

15 Ganglion cells with this concentric arrangement (i.e., ON-center, OFF- surround or OFF-center, ON-surround) found primarily in mammals with a fovea. Retinas lacking foveas, unlike most mammalian retinas, can process image motion and direction of motion.

16

17

18 How do photoreceptors, amacrine, bipolar, and horizontal cells work to make ganglion cells respond as they do? Blake & Sekuler are pretty sketchy on amacrine cells. Amacrine cells are inhibitory. Amacrine cells come in about 50 morphological types.

19 Horizontal cells Each horizontal cell connects to numerous photoreceptors. Each photoreceptor connects to numerous horizontal cells. Horizontal cells inhibit inactive photoreceptors more than active photoreceptors.

20 Wässl, H. (2004). Parallel Processing in the Mammalian Retina. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 1-11.

21 Bipolar cells These contact photoreceptors. Some bipolars: More current, less active. Some bipolars: More current, more active. More light, less current, more active. Less light, more current, more active. Inverting Non-inverting

22

23 Some numerical details In the fovea, the receptive field center of a retinal ganglion cell is connected to one cone cell. In the fovea, the surround of retinal ganglion cell is connected to around 1-3 cone cells.

24

25 Receptive Field Size The farther from fovea, the larger the field. At each degree of eccentricity, there are “big field” and “small field” cells. The “big” fields are roughly three times the area of the “small” fields.

26 Three types of retinal ganglion cells M cells (magnocellular) (large) P cells (parvocellular) (small) K cells (koniocellular) (very small) * Footnote 2, p. 82 has the terminology backward. M cells are parasol; P cells are midget.

27 M cells vs. P cells M are bigger, hence conduct more quickly. P cells are more numerous (80% of ganglion cells in primates are P cells) For any degree of eccentricity, P cells have smaller receptive fields. M cells are more responsive to luminance differences M cells are faster responders than are P cells. M cells are color indifferent; P cells are color selective.

28

29

30 Analysis of Perceptual Phenomena in Terms of Processes in Ganglion Cells Hermann Grid Illusion Mach bands

31

32

33 Questions about the Hermann Grid Illusion Why are spots only at the intersection? Why are there no spots in central vision?

34

35

36 Problems for the RGC Theory Blake & Sekuler: –Illusion varies with orientation. –Illusion varies with spatial extent of grid –Illusion varies with regularity of grid

37 Problems for the RGC Theory Schiller & Carvey, 2005: 1.Illusion is perceived over a large range of sizes. 2.Illusion is reduced when the grid is rotated by 45º. 3.Illusion can be reduced by manipulations that do not alter the antagonistic/surround activation of retinal ganglion cells. 4.The ratio of the square size to the width of the intersecting bars is an important factor.

38 Problems for the RGC Theory Schiller & Carvey, 2005: 5.Enhancing center/surround antagonism at the intersections of bars does not enhance the illusory effect. 6.Varying contrast and color produces illusory effects not readily handled by the theory. 7.The spatial arrangement of RGC receptive fields is not what has been assumed by the theory.

39

40

41

42

43

44

45 Lightness contrast: Physically identical materials appear to differ in lightness. –Previous example Lightness constancy: Physically distinct materials appear to be the same in lightness. –Text in bright sunlight and indoors

46 Does RGC activity explain lightness constancy? Hans Wallach, (1963): An RGC will produce the same response to the same ratio of center-surround illumination.

47

48

49

50

51

52 Convergence Overall 100 million photoreceptors to 1.25 million RGC But … –Convergence varies systematically with eccentricity –In the fovea, one cone per RGC center. –In the periphery, 100’s of photoreceptors per RGC center. –The more receptors an RGC has, the larger its receptive field

53 Extreme convergence: All photoreceptors to 1 RGC The RGC would be unable to resolve anything in its visual field. (Unable to distinguish differences in the spatial distribution of light.) The RGC would be very light sensitive.

54 Less extreme convergence

55

56 The Duplex Eye There is a trade-off between spatial resolution and light sensitivity. The eye meets this trade off by having two systems, one for spatial resolution and one for light sensitivity. Many RGC gather inputs from both rods and cones and switch between which make the most input to them.

57 Scotopic vision = low light vision = rod- driven vision Mesopic vision = middle light vision Photopic vision = bright light vision = cone- driven vision

58

59 Foveal convergence 33% of RGC receive cone input from retina. Retina = ~2% of retinal cells Blake & Sekuler: ratio of cones to RGC = 1:1. Schiller & Carvey: “in the central retina the number of retinal ganglion cells outnumbers the cone photoreceptors by a factor of 2 to 4). Perceptual resolution closely matches degree of convergence

60

61 Illustrations of blurred peripheral vision

62

63 Scotopic vision Under ideal conditions, a rod can react to a single photon. But, the response of a single rod is insufficient to yield a percept.

64 Scotopic vision Most effective when: 1.The rods are completely dark adapted (~35 minutes), i.e. when all the opsin molecules in the plasma disks have been refilled with retinal. 2.The photons strike a rod rich area of the retina. (~3mm from the edge of the fovea.) 3.The light entering the eye must be at the peak rod sensitivity

65

66

67

68 Photopic vision 1.The cones are completely light adapted (?) 2.The photons strike the cone rich area of the retina, i.e., the fovea. 3.The light entering the eye must be at the peak cone sensitivity

69 Purkinje shift During the day, 550nm light appears brighter than 500 nm light. During the night, 500 nm light appears brighter than 550 nm light.

70

71 Dark Adaptation Partially a function of pupil size.

72


Download ppt "Foveal cones are about 2.4 μm in diameter (0.7 min of arc) Peripheral cones are about 5.8 μm in diameter (1.7 min of arc)"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google