Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJade Mosley Modified over 9 years ago
1
LAN and WAN Monitoring at SLAC Connie Logg September 21, 2005
2
4 Main Areas LAN Internet Traffic Monitoring via Netflow –Traffic types and quantity –primary sources & destinations WAN Performance Testing and Analysis PINGER
3
LAN Monitoring “model” the network to understand connectivity I/O byte/packet counts, errors, discards, broadcast and multicast stats for all the active connections on the SLAC network Each connection has its own web pagepage Allocation of endpoints and address space – summary pagepage
4
Internet Traffic Monitoring Analyze Netflow records to determine Types of traffic – Daily summary pagepage Major external and internal sources of traffic
5
WAN Performance Measurement and Analysis IEPM-BW (since 2001) – distributed to (CERN, CALTECH, BNL, NIIT, FNAL & SLAC) Runs periodic probes to defined targets around the world – low bandwidth links only run traceroute and ping traceroute reports are generated of the performance seenreports Data from monitoring is analyzed for anomalies (email alerts generated)
6
Email Alert Report Example From: Connie Logg [iepm@slac.stanford.edu] Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 6:45 PM To: Logg, Connie A.; Cottrell, Les; Nazir, Fawad Subject: iepm-bw.slac.stanford.edu Alert: (node1.dl.ac.uk,tlaytcp) Traceroute Summary Table for TodaySummary node1.dl.ac.uk BANDWIDTH DROPDROP Date: 09/16/2005, Time = 23:34:24, %drop=97.9, Past (mean, stdev) = (37.9, 16.1) Trigger (mean,stdev) = (0.8,0.2) Graph of all the datadata Additional Information for Node= node1.dl.ac.uk, probetype = tlaytcp At epoch time = 1126938864, 09/16/2005 23:34:24
7
PINGER Started in 1992 – to check connectivity with our collaborators With DOE funding it was developed further and extended to monitoring the world In heavy use today (30 monitoring nodes) Total: 3665 pairs to 1010 remote nodes at 726 sites in 123 countries (8/05) Very useful for monitoring the digital divide and baselining connectivity around the world
8
World “Quality” S.E. Europe, Russia: catching up Latin Am., Mid East, China: keeping up India, Africa: falling behind C. Asia, Russia, S.E. Europe, L. America, M. East, China: 4- 5 yrs behind India, Africa: 7 yrs behind Important for policy makers Many institutes in developing world have less performance than a household in N. America or Europe
9
Additional Information LAN –Quick Guide (links not visible outside of SLAC)Quick Guide Internet Traffic –Netflow AnalysisNetflow Analysis IEPM-BW WAN Monitoring –ReportReport PINGER –Network Monitoring for SCICNetwork Monitoring for SCIC
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.