1. Network Layer4-1 Networking Layer Slides originally prepared by Jim Kurose and Keith Ross (for their textbook Computer Networking: A Top Down Approach 4 th edition) Adapted by Suman Banerjee for CS 640

2. Network Layer4-2 DHCP: Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol Goal: allow host to dynamically obtain its IP address from network server when it joins network Can renew its lease on address in use Allows reuse of addresses (only hold address while connected an “on”) Support for mobile users who want to join network (more shortly) DHCP overview: m host broadcasts “DHCP discover” msg m DHCP server responds with “DHCP offer” msg m host requests IP address: “DHCP request” msg m DHCP server sends address: “DHCP ack” msg

3. Network Layer4-3 DHCP client-server scenario 223.1.1.1 223.1.1.2 223.1.1.3 223.1.1.4 223.1.2.9 223.1.2.2 223.1.2.1 223.1.3.2 223.1.3.1 223.1.3.27 A B E DHCP server arriving DHCP client needs address in this network

4. Network Layer4-4 DHCP client-server scenario DHCP server: 223.1.2.5 arriving client time DHCP discover src : 0.0.0.0, 68 dest.: 255.255.255.255,67 yiaddr: 0.0.0.0 transaction ID: 654 DHCP offer src: 223.1.2.5, 67 dest: 255.255.255.255, 68 yiaddrr: 223.1.2.4 transaction ID: 654 Lifetime: 3600 secs DHCP request src: 0.0.0.0, 68 dest:: 255.255.255.255, 67 yiaddrr: 223.1.2.4 transaction ID: 655 Lifetime: 3600 secs DHCP ACK src: 223.1.2.5, 67 dest: 255.255.255.255, 68 yiaddrr: 223.1.2.4 transaction ID: 655 Lifetime: 3600 secs

5. Network Layer4-5 More on DHCP r Servers often have 2 sets of IP address m Static pool (to configure say, desktop machines) and dynamic pool (to configure transient machines) r Servers often use the policy of “ping- before-offer” for IP address allocation m If a (rogue) machine responds to a ping for an IP address in the dynamic pool, that IP address gets abandoned by the server

6. Network Layer4-6 IP addresses: how to get one? Q: How does network get subnet part of IP addr? A: gets allocated portion of its provider ISP’s address space ISP's block 11001000 00010111 00010000 00000000 200.23.16.0/20 Organization 0 11001000 00010111 00010000 00000000 200.23.16.0/23 Organization 1 11001000 00010111 00010010 00000000 200.23.18.0/23 Organization 2 11001000 00010111 00010100 00000000 200.23.20.0/23... ….. …. …. Organization 7 11001000 00010111 00011110 00000000 200.23.30.0/23

7. Network Layer4-7 Hierarchical addressing: route aggregation “Send me anything with addresses beginning 200.23.16.0/20” 200.23.16.0/23200.23.18.0/23200.23.30.0/23 Fly-By-Night-ISP Organization 0 Organization 7 Internet Organization 1 ISPs-R-Us “Send me anything with addresses beginning 199.31.0.0/16” 200.23.20.0/23 Organization 2...... Hierarchical addressing allows efficient advertisement of routing information:

8. Network Layer4-8 Hierarchical addressing: more specific routes ISPs-R-Us has a more specific route to Organization 1 “Send me anything with addresses beginning 200.23.16.0/20” 200.23.16.0/23200.23.18.0/23200.23.30.0/23 Fly-By-Night-ISP Organization 0 Organization 7 Internet Organization 1 ISPs-R-Us “Send me anything with addresses beginning 199.31.0.0/16 or 200.23.18.0/23” 200.23.20.0/23 Organization 2......

9. Network Layer4-9 IP addressing: the last word... Q: How does an ISP get block of addresses? A: ICANN: Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers m allocates addresses m manages DNS m assigns domain names, resolves disputes

10. Network Layer4-10 NAT: Network Address Translation 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 10.0.0.3 10.0.0.4 138.76.29.7 local network (e.g., home network) 10.0.0/24 rest of Internet Datagrams with source or destination in this network have 10.0.0/24 address for source, destination (as usual) All datagrams leaving local network have same single source NAT IP address: 138.76.29.7, different source port numbers

11. Network Layer4-11 NAT: Network Address Translation r Motivation: local network uses just one IP address as far as outside world is concerned: m range of addresses not needed from ISP: just one IP address for all devices m can change addresses of devices in local network without notifying outside world m can change ISP without changing addresses of devices in local network m devices inside local net not explicitly addressable, visible by outside world (a security plus).

12. Network Layer4-12 NAT: Network Address Translation Implementation: NAT router must: m outgoing datagrams: replace (source IP address, port #) of every outgoing datagram to (NAT IP address, new port #)... remote clients/servers will respond using (NAT IP address, new port #) as destination addr. m remember (in NAT translation table) every (source IP address, port #) to (NAT IP address, new port #) translation pair m incoming datagrams: replace (NAT IP address, new port #) in dest fields of every incoming datagram with corresponding (source IP address, port #) stored in NAT table

13. Network Layer4-13 NAT: Network Address Translation 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 10.0.0.3 S: 10.0.0.1, 3345 D: 128.119.40.186, 80 1 10.0.0.4 138.76.29.7 1: host 10.0.0.1 sends datagram to 128.119.40.186, 80 NAT translation table WAN side addr LAN side addr 138.76.29.7, 5001 10.0.0.1, 3345 …… S: 128.119.40.186, 80 D: 10.0.0.1, 3345 4 S: 138.76.29.7, 5001 D: 128.119.40.186, 80 2 2: NAT router changes datagram source addr from 10.0.0.1, 3345 to 138.76.29.7, 5001, updates table S: 128.119.40.186, 80 D: 138.76.29.7, 5001 3 3: Reply arrives dest. address: 138.76.29.7, 5001 4: NAT router changes datagram dest addr from 138.76.29.7, 5001 to 10.0.0.1, 3345

14. Network Layer4-14 NAT: Network Address Translation r 16-bit port-number field: m 60,000 simultaneous connections with a single LAN-side address! r NAT is controversial: m routers should only process up to layer 3 m violates end-to-end argument NAT possibility must be taken into account by app designers, eg, P2P applications m address shortage should instead be solved by IPv6

15. Network Layer4-15 NAT traversal problem r client wants to connect to server with address 10.0.0.1 m server address 10.0.0.1 local to LAN (client can’t use it as destination addr) m only one externally visible NATted address: 138.76.29.7 r solution 1: statically configure NAT to forward incoming connection requests at given port to server m e.g., (123.76.29.7, port 2500) always forwarded to 10.0.0.1 port 25000 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.4 NAT router 138.76.29.7 Client ?

16. Network Layer4-16 NAT traversal problem r solution 2: Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) Internet Gateway Device (IGD) Protocol. Allows NATted host to:  learn public IP address (138.76.29.7)  add/remove port mappings (with lease times) i.e., automate static NAT port map configuration 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.4 NAT router 138.76.29.7 IGD

17. Network Layer4-17 NAT traversal problem r solution 3: relaying (used in Skype) m NATed client establishes connection to relay m External client connects to relay m relay bridges packets between to connections 138.76.29.7 Client 10.0.0.1 NAT router 1. connection to relay initiated by NATted host 2. connection to relay initiated by client 3. relaying established

18. Network Layer4-18 IPv6 r Initial motivation: 32-bit address space soon to be completely allocated. r Additional motivation: m header format helps speed processing/forwarding m header changes to facilitate QoS IPv6 datagram format: m fixed-length 40 byte header m no fragmentation allowed

19. Network Layer4-19 IPv6 Header (Cont) Priority: identify priority among datagrams in flow Flow Label: identify datagrams in same “flow.” (concept of“flow” not well defined). Next header: identify upper layer protocol for data

20. Network Layer4-20 Other Changes from IPv4 r Checksum: removed entirely to reduce processing time at each hop r Options: allowed, but outside of header, indicated by “Next Header” field r ICMPv6: new version of ICMP m additional message types, e.g. “Packet Too Big” m multicast group management functions

21. Network Layer4-21 Transition From IPv4 To IPv6 r Not all routers can be upgraded simultaneous m no “flag days” m How will the network operate with mixed IPv4 and IPv6 routers? r Tunneling: IPv6 carried as payload in IPv4 datagram among IPv4 routers

22. Network Layer4-22 Tunneling A B E F IPv6 tunnel Logical view: Physical view: A B E F IPv6 IPv4

23. Network Layer4-23 Tunneling A B E F IPv6 tunnel Logical view: Physical view: A B E F IPv6 C D IPv4 Flow: X Src: A Dest: F data Flow: X Src: A Dest: F data Flow: X Src: A Dest: F data Src:B Dest: E Flow: X Src: A Dest: F data Src:B Dest: E A-to-B: IPv6 E-to-F: IPv6 B-to-C: IPv6 inside IPv4 B-to-C: IPv6 inside IPv4

24. Network Layer4-24 IP Multicast

25. Network Layer4-25 R1 R2 R3R4 source duplication R1 R2 R3R4 in-network duplication duplicate creation/transmission duplicate Broadcast Routing r deliver packets from source to all other nodes r source duplication is inefficient: r source duplication: how does source determine recipient addresses?

26. Network Layer4-26 In-network duplication r flooding: when node receives brdcst pckt, sends copy to all neighbors m Problems: cycles & broadcast storm r controlled flooding: node only brdcsts pkt if it hasn’t brdcst same packet before m Node keeps track of pckt ids already brdcsted m Or reverse path forwarding (RPF): only forward pckt if it arrived on shortest path between node and source r spanning tree m No redundant packets received by any node

27. Network Layer4-27 A B G D E c F A B G D E c F (a) Broadcast initiated at A (b) Broadcast initiated at D Spanning Tree r First construct a spanning tree r Nodes forward copies only along spanning tree

28. Network Layer4-28 A B G D E c F 1 2 3 4 5 (a)Stepwise construction of spanning tree A B G D E c F (b) Constructed spanning tree Spanning Tree: Creation r Center node r Each node sends unicast join message to center node m Message forwarded until it arrives at a node already belonging to spanning tree

29. Multicast Routing: Problem Statement r Goal: find a tree (or trees) connecting routers having local mcast group members m tree: not all paths between routers used m source-based: different tree from each sender to rcvrs m shared-tree: same tree used by all group members Shared tree Source-based trees

30. Approaches for building mcast trees Approaches: r source-based tree: one tree per source m shortest path trees m reverse path forwarding r group-shared tree: group uses one tree m minimal spanning (Steiner) m center-based trees …we first look at basic approaches, then specific protocols adopting these approaches

31. Shortest Path Tree r mcast forwarding tree: tree of shortest path routes from source to all receivers m Dijkstra’s algorithm R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 2 1 6 3 4 5 i router with attached group member router with no attached group member link used for forwarding, i indicates order link added by algorithm LEGEND S: source

32. Reverse Path Forwarding if (mcast datagram received on incoming link on shortest path back to center) then flood datagram onto all outgoing links else ignore datagram  rely on router’s knowledge of unicast shortest path from it to sender  each router has simple forwarding behavior:

33. Reverse Path Forwarding: example result is a source-specific reverse SPT –may be a bad choice with asymmetric links R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 router with attached group member router with no attached group member datagram will be forwarded LEGEND S: source datagram will not be forwarded

34. Reverse Path Forwarding: pruning r forwarding tree contains subtrees with no mcast group members m no need to forward datagrams down subtree m “prune” msgs sent upstream by router with no downstream group members R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 router with attached group member router with no attached group member prune message LEGEND S: source links with multicast forwarding P P P

35. Shared-Tree: Steiner Tree r Steiner Tree: minimum cost tree connecting all routers with attached group members r problem is NP-complete r excellent heuristics exists r not used in practice: m computational complexity m information about entire network needed m monolithic: rerun whenever a router needs to join/leave

36. Center-based trees r single delivery tree shared by all r one router identified as “center” of tree r to join: m edge router sends unicast join-msg addressed to center router m join-msg “processed” by intermediate routers and forwarded towards center m join-msg either hits existing tree branch for this center, or arrives at center m path taken by join-msg becomes new branch of tree for this router

37. Center-based trees: an example Suppose R6 chosen as center: R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 router with attached group member router with no attached group member path order in which join messages generated LEGEND 2 1 3 1

38. Internet Multicasting Routing: DVMRP r DVMRP: distance vector multicast routing protocol, RFC1075 r flood and prune: reverse path forwarding, source-based tree m RPF tree based on DVMRP’s own routing tables constructed by communicating DVMRP routers m no assumptions about underlying unicast m initial datagram to mcast group flooded everywhere via RPF m routers not wanting group: send upstream prune msgs

39. DVMRP: continued… r soft state: DVMRP router periodically (1 min.) “forgets” branches are pruned: m mcast data again flows down unpruned branch m downstream router: reprune or else continue to receive data r routers can quickly regraft to tree m following IGMP join at leaf r odds and ends m commonly implemented in commercial routers m Mbone routing done using DVMRP

40. Tunneling Q: How to connect “islands” of multicast routers in a “sea” of unicast routers?  mcast datagram encapsulated inside “normal” (non-multicast- addressed) datagram  normal IP datagram sent thru “tunnel” via regular IP unicast to receiving mcast router  receiving mcast router unencapsulates to get mcast datagram physical topology logical topology

41. PIM: Protocol Independent Multicast r not dependent on any specific underlying unicast routing algorithm (works with all) r two different multicast distribution scenarios : Dense:  group members densely packed, in “close” proximity.  bandwidth more plentiful Sparse:  # networks with group members small wrt # interconnected networks  group members “widely dispersed”  bandwidth not plentiful

42. Consequences of Sparse-Dense Dichotomy: Dense r group membership by routers assumed until routers explicitly prune r data-driven construction on mcast tree (e.g., RPF) r bandwidth and non- group-router processing profligate Sparse : r no membership until routers explicitly join r receiver- driven construction of mcast tree (e.g., center-based) r bandwidth and non-group- router processing conservative

43. PIM- Dense Mode flood-and-prune RPF, similar to DVMRP but  underlying unicast protocol provides RPF info for incoming datagram  less complicated (less efficient) downstream flood than DVMRP reduces reliance on underlying routing algorithm  has protocol mechanism for router to detect it is a leaf-node router

44. PIM - Sparse Mode r center-based approach r router sends join msg to rendezvous point (RP) m intermediate routers update state and forward join r after joining via RP, router can switch to source-specific tree m increased performance: less concentration, shorter paths R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 join all data multicast from rendezvous point rendezvous point

45. PIM - Sparse Mode sender(s): r unicast data to RP, which distributes down RP-rooted tree r RP can extend mcast tree upstream to source r RP can send stop msg if no attached receivers m “no one is listening!” R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 join all data multicast from rendezvous point rendezvous point

46. Network Layer4-46 Chapter 4: summary r 4. 1 Introduction r 4.2 Virtual circuit and datagram networks r 4.3 What’s inside a router r 4.4 IP: Internet Protocol m Datagram format m IPv4 addressing m ICMP m IPv6 r 4.5 Routing algorithms m Link state m Distance Vector m Hierarchical routing r 4.6 Routing in the Internet m RIP m OSPF m BGP r 4.7 Broadcast and multicast routing