Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byIlene Joseph Modified over 9 years ago
1
Comparison of Holstein service-sire fertility for heifer and cow breedings with conventional and sexed semen H. D. Norman*, J. L. Hutchison, and P. M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705-2350 Abstr. W30 2010 RESULTS (continued) High correlations between cow and heifer SCR within semen type 0.68 (August 2009) and 0.67 (January 2010) for conventional semen 0.73 (August 2009) and 0.75 (January 2010) for sexed semen Low correlations between conventional- and sexed-semen SCR within first and later parities 0.10 (August 2009) and 0.18 (January 2010) for cows – 0.22 (August 2009) and 0.08 (January 2010) for heifers Correlations between August 2009 and January 2010 SCR High correlations between corresponding models (0.96 to 0.98) High correlations between cow and heifer SCR with same semen type (0.62 to 0.78) Low correlations between conventional- and sexed-semen SCR RESULTS Summary statistics Mean SCR near 0.0% for all data sets Mean reliabilities near 80% for conventional-semen SCR; slightly lower for sexed-semen SCR High SD for heifer sexed-semen SCR (5.78 for August 2009 and 4.34 in January 2010) Correlations between SCR (above diagonal) and genetic correlations [r G AB = r AB /√(REL A /100)(REL B /100); Calo et al., 1973, JAS 37:676] for true SCR (below diagonal) DATA & METHODS Holstein breeding reports provided by dairy records processing centers Data edits Most recent 4 yr of inseminations Services between 30 and 365 DIM >4,536 kg milk Herd-year with >50% milking cows with recorded breedings Herd conception rate between 10 and 90% No ET donors SCR model based on confirmed conception rate with variables for herd- year-season-parity-registration status, parity, service number, year-state- month, cow age, milk yield, short cycle between matings, bull age, inbreeding of service sire and embryo, stud-mating year Parity removed from models with heifer data Service-sire age groups consolidated for sexed-semen breedings AI Holstein bulls with ≥300 breedings in ≥10 herds overall and ≥100 matings during the last 12 mo summarized CONCLUSIONS Models appear to be consistent across consecutive evaluations Fertility rankings for sexed semen differ considerably from conventional evaluations and warrant separate SCR Combining cow and heifer breedings could be advantageous INTRODUCTION Sire conception rate (SCR), a phenotypic fertility evaluation for service sires, was implemented by USDA in August 2008. The evaluation is based on the first 7 conventional-semen breedings for parities 1 through 5 and contains 14 effects to predict bull conception rate. OBJECTIVE To compare official SCR evaluations (C cow ) with SCR from 3 alternative data sets: Conventional-semen breedings for primiparous heifers (C heifer ) Sexed-semen breedings from parities 1 through 5 (S cow ) Sexed-semen breedings for primiparous heifers (S heifer ) http://aipl.arsusda.gov Data set August 2009January 2010 C cow 13,213,12613,216,858 C heifer 1,583,2011,515,395 S cow 56,99458,876 S heifer 189,526222,988 Mean matings/ bull, n ModelBulls, n SCR, % Reliability, % MeanSD August 2009 C cow 2,328–0.0012.31793,393 C heifer 2760.0012.60833,592 S cow 310.0002.57721,153 S heifer 1080.0015.78761,306 January 2010 C cow 2,3090.0002.21793,297 C heifer 2700.0022.57823,321 S cow 25–0.0122.39731,263 S heifer 1140.0024.34751,313 ModelC cow C heifer S cow S heifer August 2009 C cow … 0.68 0.10–0.08 C heifer 1.00…–0.05 –0.22 S cow –0.15–0.07… 0.73 S heifer –0.10 0.14 0.85… January 2010 C cow … 0.67 0.18 0.10 C heifer 0.82… 0.16 0.08 S cow 0.24 0.20… 0.75 S heifer 0.13 0.11 1.02… January 2010 August 2009 C cow C heifer S cow S heifer C cow 0.960.640.22–0.05 C heifer 0.620.960.06 –0.14 S cow 0.170.160.980.75 S heifer 0.090.010.780.96
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.