1. Training Technology Subcommittee Minneapolis June 2003 CBT & desktop simulation scenarios Jean-Louis Bravo Jean-Louis BravoAIRBUS

2. Training Technology Subcommittee Minneapolis June 2003 Use existing simulation l How to get simulation on PC? u From manufacturer u From reverse engineering l Advantages u Realistic scenarios (e.g. procedures, tasks, …) u Dialogue via API or shared memory with true simulation l Drawbacks u Price for licenses so, how to deliver your course? Demo: simEngine & simClient

3. Training Technology Subcommittee Minneapolis June 2003

4. Training Technology Subcommittee Minneapolis June 2003 Use recorded simulation l Useful for procedures & tasks l Advantages u Lower price for licenses u Better CBT synchronization l Drawbacks u No free play available u “Static” trainee during play-back Demo: PlayBackRun

5. Training Technology Subcommittee Minneapolis June 2003 Play Back run Record example: 1;0=0;1=0;2=0;3=0;4=0;5=0 4;5=550;9=2;14=2 7;0=1;5=780 …….. -50

6. Training Technology Subcommittee Minneapolis June 2003 Use recorded simulation(cont.) l Improve play-back by calling multi media objects at the “strategic” parts of the record (i.e. breakpoint) like: u Text file u CBT files (html, PPT, …) u Audio or video messages l Breakpoints can be inside or outside the simulation record: u Stand alone concept u Session guide as Stand-up concept Demo: PlayBackRun & SessionGuide

7. Training Technology Subcommittee Minneapolis June 2003 Stand Alone Breakpoint example: 1;0=0;1=0;2=0;3=0;4=0;5=0;6=180;7=0;…. 2;-1="U70N1081:1:AUTOMATIC START ….” ………. 44;12=160;-5="U70N1081:55:At N2 …” …… -120

8. Training Technology Subcommittee Minneapolis June 2003 Session Guide Automatic Start..... Automatic Start Sequence … The rotary selector... Initial status...........

9. Training Technology Subcommittee Minneapolis June 2003 Conclusion l Both scenarios are useful l Existing simulation u Effectiveness for training centers (e.g. briefing/debriefing tool before FFS sessions) u Controlled investment l Recorded simulation u Low pricing for delivery u Better integration of simulation sequences within the CBT

10. Training Technology Subcommittee Minneapolis June 2003