1. Sustainability Training Series 2015 From Piloting to Sustaining Practices August 11, 2015 1:00pm - 3:00pm Promoting and Sustaining Family-School Partnerships

2. Making the Most of a GTM Muting & unmuting Using chat function Group activities Participation via Go To Meeting

3. Agenda Review of NSNH Essentials Critical Components of Family Engagement Family Roles The Dual Capacity-Building Framework Resources to Build Family Engagement

4. Learning Objectives Understand the critical components to family involvement in transition Identify differing family roles of involvement and how that impacts transition Understand the Dual Capacity-Building Framework and its implications for developing and sustaining family-school partnerships in transitionDual Capacity-Building Framework Identify next steps for continued development and sustainability of family-school partnerships moving forward

5. Materials Presentation Handout Critical Components of Family Involvement Practices Family Roles Handout Mapping Activity Sheet Dual Capacity-Building Framework Graphic Dual Capacity-Building Worksheet Pre/Post Assessment and Evaluation Action Plan Additional Resources

6. NSNH Essentials Next Steps NH offers training and coaching on embedding evidence-informed transition practices in schools to increase the graduation rate of students with disabilities and students at-risk of dropping out and prepare them for college, career and adult life. Training introduces and illustrates the practice. Coaching supports putting the training to use.

7. NSNH Essentials Transition practices include: Enhanced transition planning, activities & opportunities, including RENEW Best practice Extended Learning Opportunities (ELOs) High level family-school engagement Evidence shows that embedding new practices requires multi-stage implementation.

8. NSNH Essentials Implementing practices with fidelity is a primary focus. The use of planning tools ensures fidelity. When implemented with fidelity these practices will increase the graduation rates of students with disabilities and students at-risk of dropping out and prepare them for college, career and adult life. Not In Place Partially In Place In Place Critical Component of Practice XFamilies and school staff engage in regular, two-way meaningful communication throughout the transition process.

9. Family Engagement Two-way communication Shared decision making Transition-related training opportunities Student Development Best Practice ELOs Self-Determination RENEW Program Structure Leadership Teams Ongoing Strategic Planning Policy & Procedure Transition Competencies for Staff Transition Coordinator ELO Board Student-Focused Planning Student Led IEPs RENEW Transition Assessment Interagency Collaboration Community Services Colleges/Universities ELO Partners Transition- Focused Education Framework Adapted from Taxonomy for Transition Programming, Kohler, P.D. (1996) & NH CoP Template for Secondary Transition & NH Standards for Family /School Partnerships

10. SUSTAINABILITY Leadership, ELO, RENEW, Family Engagement Teams & Program Structures 1. EXPLORATION Develop & Meet w/ Project Teams (Leadership – ELO – FEG – RENEW) Complete Fidelity tools 3. INITIAL IMPLEMENTATION Implement action plans Identify & address challenges Scale up ELOs, RENEW & Transition Practices Integrate family-school partnership strategies (Based on Dean Fixen et al & SWIFT) 2. INSTALLATION Develop action plans Participate in foundational trainings RENEW student mapping Pilot a high quality ELO, EI transition practices Offer parent education 4. FULL IMPLEMENTATION Processes & procedures in place System recalibrated to accommodate & support new initiatives

11. SUSTAINABILITY Leadership Team Representation Family Engagement Subgroup Program Structures 1. EXPLORATION Develop Family Focus Groups Use family feedback in completing the Fidelity tool 3. INITIAL IMPLEMENTATION Implement action plans Identify & address challenges Develop Family Engagement Subgroups Initial integration of Family-School partnership strategies, processes and procedures (Based on Dean Fixen et al & SWIFT) 2. INSTALLATION Develop action plan to increase family engagement Include a parent on the school leadership team Parent coaching Offer parent education 4. FULL IMPLEMENTATION Processes & procedures in place System recalibrated to accommodate & support new initiatives Promoting and Sustaining Family-School Partnerships

12. Critical Components to Family Engagement in Transition Respect Diversity Communication Processes Shared Decision-Making Transition Law Connecting to Resources Family Transition Training

13. Family Engagement Efforts Related to Transition Warlene D. Gary and Robert Witherspoon (2011). The Power of Family-School-Community Partnerships. NEA

14. Activity Debrief What activities strategies did you identify? How are they related to preparing or engaging families with transition?

15. The Definition of Family Engagement Family Engagement is any way that a child’s adult caretaker (biological parents, foster parents, siblings, grand parents, etc.)effectively supports learning and healthy development

16. Differing Family Roles Supporters of their children’s learning and development Encouragers of an achievement identity, a positive self image, and a “can do” spirit in their children Monitors of their children’s time, behavior, boundaries and resources Models of lifelong learning and enthusiasm for education Advocates/Activists for improved learning opportunities for their children and at their schools Decision-makers/choosers of educational options for their children, the school, and community Collaborators with school staff and members of the community on issues of school improvement and reform Mapp, Karen L., and Kuttner, Paul J. (2013). Partners in Education: A Dual Capacity-Building Framework for Family–School Partnerships. SEDL

17. Family Engagement Efforts Related to Transition Warlene D. Gary and Robert Witherspoon (2011). The Power of Family-School-Community Partnerships. NEA

18. Activity Debrief Can you identify what which parent roles might be missing? Can you think about other ways to engage parents (venues, media, processes)?

20. WHY CAN IT BE SO DIFFICULT TO CULTIVATE AND SUSTAIN EFFECTIVE FAMILY SCHOOL PARTNERSHIPS?

21. CapabilitiesConnectionsConfidenceCognition What do we mean by capacity?

22. Capabilities: Skills & Knowledge Families School & District Need to know about student learning Need to understand the inner workings of school as a system Need advocacy and educational support Need knowledge about the community Need knowledge about cultural competency Need to building trusting relationships CapabilitiesConnectionsConfidenceCognition Mapp, Karen L., and Kuttner, Paul J. (2013). Partners in Education: A Dual Capacity-Building Framework for Family–School Partnerships. SEDL

23. Connections: Relationships Family – Teacher Parent – Parent Teacher - Teacher CapabilitiesConnectionsConfidenceCognition Mapp, Karen L., and Kuttner, Paul J. (2013). Partners in Education: A Dual Capacity-Building Framework for Family–School Partnerships. SEDL

24. Confidence Personal beliefs about ability Knowing one’s own strengths Recognition of one’s own accomplishments Developing relationships across cultural lines CapabilitiesConnectionsConfidenceCognition Mapp, Karen L., and Kuttner, Paul J. (2013). Partners in Education: A Dual Capacity-Building Framework for Family–School Partnerships. SEDL

25. Cognition: Beliefs &Worldview School & District Families Commitment to working as partners Belief that partnerships improve student learning View themselves as partners with the school Understanding of multiple roles families play CapabilitiesConnectionsConfidenceCognition Mapp, Karen L., and Kuttner, Paul J. (2013). Partners in Education: A Dual Capacity-Building Framework for Family–School Partnerships. SEDL

26. The Challenge: Lack of opportunities for School/Program Staff to build capacity for partnerships around transition Lack of opportunities for families to build the capacity for partnerships Developing Family Engagement Strategies and Family-School Partnerships During Transition

27. Process Conditions Relational Developmental Linked to learning Collaborative Interactive Mapp, Karen L., and Kuttner, Paul J. (2013). Partners in Education: A Dual Capacity-Building Framework for Family–School Partnerships. SEDL

28. The Family Engagement Shift FROMTO Focus on ProgramsFocus on Relationship Deficit-based and adversarial Strengths-based & collaborative Random ActsSystemic Individual Collaborative/shared responsibility Compliance driven Learning and outcomes drives ServiceDevelopmental One-time projectSustained Mapp, Karen L.,

29. Dual Capacity-Building Worksheet

30. Activity Debrief What activity did you choose? What process conditions were have been missing or could be enhanced? Were you able to identify ways to incorporate other process conditions? If so, what were some of your ideas?

31. Organizational Conditions Organizational Conditions aka Program Structures Systemic Integrated Sustained Mapp, Karen L., and Kuttner, Paul J. (2013). Partners in Education: A Dual Capacity-Building Framework for Family–School Partnerships. SEDL

33. Family Engagement Resources Professional Development Materials Dual Capacity Planning for Life after High School Planning for a Successful Transition Learning Outside the Classroom Involving Families in Secondary Transition High School is a Big Thing Flyer Life after High School Transition Toolkit Think Different (ELO Brochure) Ongoing support through NH Connections Three part youth series on self- determination, self-advocacy and understanding the IEP Family Engagement in Transition Focused Education Resources Family Engagement in Transition Focused Education Resources

34. Action Planning

35. Summary Understand the critical components to family involvement in transition Identify differing family roles of involvement and how that impacts transition Understand the Dual Capacity-Building Framework and its implications for developing and sustaining family-school partnerships in transition Identify next steps for continued development and sustainability of family-school partnerships moving forward

36. Closing Thoughts, Questions and Post-Assessment

37. Thank You! The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education, H323A120003. However, those contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the US Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. Project Officer, Corinne Weidenthal. This product is public domain. Authorization to reproduce it in whole or in part is granted. While permission to reprint is not necessary, the citation should be: NH State Personnel Development Grant – Next Steps NH (2012-2017). New Hampshire Department of Education, Concord.