1. Healthy Streams Basic WQ Total Ammonia Unionized NH 3 Nitrate Ortho-phosphate Turbidity TDS TSS pH departure Toxics Water and Sediment Metals PAHs pesticides and PCBs other toxics Toxicity Invertebrate survival in water Invertebrate reproduction in water Invertebrate survival in sediment Fish survival Fish growth Algae survival-growth Biostimulation Oxygen Departure Predicted Oxygen Deficit NNE NNE or measured Benthic Algae Floating algae Chlorophyll a Bioassessment BMI CSCI Algae O/E or CSCI Habitat CRAM 4 Attributes Water Temperature Conductivity Turbidity Canopy (shade?) Habitat complexity Bank stability PHab (MMI or Herbst) USFW steelhead flow 1984 DFG flow for fish life stages Land management Pesticide Use Reports Impervious Surface Cover Impervious Cover Model Impervious cover per capita Stormwater volume / impervious ratio Agricultural Land Cover (NLCD) Urban (developed) Land Cover Flow? Surface Rec Fecal Coliform E. coli Pathogens Groundwater Drink Nitrate Salts, sodium, chloride conductivity Water Metals (incl. arsenic) Water PAHs Water pesticides PCBs Other toxics Water Quality Index Aquatic Life Aquatic Habitat Index Aquatic Toxicity Index Biostimulatory Risk Index Bioassessment Index Land Management Index Water Quality Index Human Health Groundwater Index Vision Goal 1 Healthy Aquatic Habitat Vision Goal 2 Proper Land Management Vision Goal 3 Clean Groundwater Cadmus % Natural cover Soil Infiltration Imperviousness Landscape Hydrologic Etc. R3 Ag Program Enrollment Implementation Metrics R3 Stormwater LID BMP Metrics Coastal Otter stories HAB stories Other Wetland CRAM Other stories Estuary Benthos Toxicity Bioaccumulation Boxes in this row are data usage anti-degradation of high quality waters background and upstream conditions relevant to TMDLs, conditions at compliance points, standards evaluation (turbidity, DO, pH, or salts), beneficial use considerations for riparian habitat and flood storage degree to which land use restrictions might affect water quality and watershed function Assess status of key indicators Determine % of aquatic habitat (by reach) in condition categories ranging from exceptional to highly degraded at reach, HUC-12, HUC-8 and Regional scales. Provide Regional context to facilitate prioritization of management action based on conditions at the HUC 12 scale. Evaluate relationships between landscape and habitat condition indicators Evaluate relationships between operational and condition indicators Assess Seasonal and Regional Trends in key indicators For municipal wells or local well subsets, determine % of wells in condition categories; at basin, HUC-12, HUC-8 and Regional scales. All of the same analyses as for WQ Aquatic Life Maps of Cadmus outputs with WQ indicators by site Maps of pesticide usage per watershed with WQ indicators by site Diagrams of key processes Maps of condition with pie symbols for sites and multi indicators Maps of trend by waterbody or site Histograms of key Indicators Regression graphs of condition versus operational measures Maps of pesticide usage per watershed and changes in use over time Maps of impervious surface area per watershed and changes in imperviousness over time Table data for indicators at levels of concern Maps of condition colored by reach These 5 indices address the single general objective and its composite aquatic life beneficial use. Surface Drink Nitrate Salts, conductivity Water Metals Water PAHs Water pesticides PCBs Other toxics Surface Fish BOG summaries BOG maps Groundwater Ag Salts, sodium, chloride conductivity Assess status and trends of key indicators Vision Goal 3A Surface Water Human Health Rounded boxes in this row are analyses to be done. Rounded boxes in this row are maps, graphics etc., to be done. Nancy Richard’s map of extent Shade map colors for data density and confidence Regression graphs of everything vs everything, with at least: Regression, Cond prob analysis Change point analysis Analysis of upstream probability sites to test assumption of high quality CDFs for differences between good and bad sites: use to evaluate standards Howard’s TMDL summary-type products to show success of TMDLs Parameters in bold are used in more than one index.

2. Goal 1: Healthy Aquatic Habitat: By 2025, 80% of aquatic habitat is healthy, and the remaining 20% exhibits positive trends in key measures of aquatic health. Percent Healthy (to status) Percent Improving (to trends) Goal 2: Proper Land Management: By 2025, 80% of lands within any watershed is managed to maintain healthy watershed functions, and the remaining 20% will exhibit positive trends in key management indicators. Goal 3: Healthy Water for Human Uses: By 2025, 80% of surface and ground water is clean for drinking and swimming, and fish and shellfish are safe to eat. The remaining 20% will exhibit positive trends in key measures of human health. Home Trends Summary and Findings Technical Approach You can’t see it here, but there is a text box below this map for adding details. Goals are clickable. The crown menu is something we need to figure out (where I have put placeholders – trends, summary and findings, technical approach, etc.) Dave will adjust colors to blue, dk green, lt green, yellow, lt red, dk red

3. Water Quality Index Aquatic Life Aquatic Habitat Index Aquatic Toxicity Index Biostimulatory Risk Index Bioassessment Index Healthy Aquatic Habitat Text below contains basic descriptions of indices, each index is clickable Bar charts show what percent of the Region (or watershed) is healthy (and should mimic our color scheme)

4. Water Quality Index Total Ammonia Nitrate Ortho-phosphate Turbidity TDS TSS pH departure Text below contains basic descriptions of components of index, rationale for selection, each component is clickable to get a map of that analyte’s scoring, maybe a link to the data navigator, a link to the rule, etc. (See “About the Analyte on existing website”) – need to brainstorm Metals PAHs Pesticides PCBs Other toxics

5. Possible entry points How would you like to assess our information? Map Navigator Goals Assessment Questions Best and Worst Places Fish and Wildlife Waterbody Types Report Card (Indicators/Indices) Beneficial Uses

6. Icon lists Tiny map Assessment Questions? Fish, test tubes, etc. Best and Worst of the Central Coast (bad and good pics) Problems

7. Nearshore coastal waters Water Body Types streamslakes Estuaries Central Coast Portal link (website w/ loading context) Wetlands Pesticide Risk Upstream imperviousness Existing Studies Harbors CC loading Sea otter stories HABs and nutrients Pesticide discharge to MPAs BOG Maps and summaries Other issues – microcystin (Pinto, Lopez), eutrophication, etc. Postings, TMDLs: Nacimiento, Hernandez, Oso Flaco, Pinto, etc. Harbor Report MEQs for harbors data

8. Fish and Wildlife Steelhead Trout Benthic Inverts Sea ottersNearshore Fish Birds Shellfish Caspian Terns Egg shell thinning in condors Sand Crabs Commercial shellfish closures Mussels Sport shellfish closures from Red Tide Arrow Gobies - nonylphenol Rockfish - mercury Sablefish - DDT Tissue Chem – PBDE, PCB Bacterial Disease HABs – domoic acid, microcystin etc. Protozoal disease Harbor Study CCLEAN IBIs and O/E Base Flow Water Quality NOAA Critical Habitat* – overlay with healthy waters CEAM – Andy Gunther * http://swr.nmfs.noaa.gov/cg/SCCC_Steelhead_Distribution_06_2005.jpg

9. Links Water Quality Portal EPA Healthy Water Quality Recovery Potential SWAMP CCAMP Reports Regional WB/St Board

10. Technical Approach Index and Report Card Development Mapping and NHD stuff Lab and Field References Scoring and Grading Aggregating measures into Indices Scoring Indices Assessment Approach Assessment Questions Data Sources

11. Assessment Questions Text – List questions with short descriptive text, how we address it in the project

12. Data Sources CCAMP – include narrative description of program, level of QA, where to go for more info. SWAMP CCWQP 303(d)

13. Graphics