Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Banking in the U. S. ECO 473 Dr. D. Foster I. Asymmetric Information II. Structure.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Banking in the U. S. ECO 473 Dr. D. Foster I. Asymmetric Information II. Structure."— Presentation transcript:

1 Banking in the U. S. ECO 473 Dr. D. Foster I. Asymmetric Information II. Structure

2 I. Problems of Asymmetric Information

3 Direct & Indirect Finance Most external financing is done through intermediaries.

4 Banks Reduce Transaction Costs Banks reduce the cost of acquiring assets. Many costs are fixed. Bank assets are highly liquid. Economies of scale.  e.g., using standard loan contracts as legal fees are averaged over many loans Transactions costs are very low for lines of credit.

5 Adverse Selection Those most eager to make a deal are the least desirable to the other party.  Bad risks want loans.  Firms with lots of risk want to sell bonds. Risk drives up interest rate & drives out low risk borrowers, if this problem persists.

6 Moral Hazard Post-contractual change in behavior that puts other party at increased risk.  Will borrower really be prudent and repay?  Will company really be prudent and max. profits?  Does insurance reduce vigilance? Markets cannot form if this persists.

7 Principal-Agent Problems The action of the agent is contrary to the desires of the principal.  Workers shirk at their jobs.  Managers are also agents - they work for owners- shareholders.  Can bond-holders and stock-holders really monitor the firm? Problems: Enron, Arthur Anderson

8 How do Banks Deal with Asymmetries? Screen borrowers.  Avoids free rider problems with information. Requirements for collateral and net worth.  Shifts risk to the borrower; avoids adverse selection.  Also, mitigates moral hazard. Imposing covenants and monitoring.  Reduces moral hazard. Variable interest rates and credit rationing.  Some tolerance for risk. Should the government get involved with asymmetries?

9 Investment Banks & Asymmetries They provide research on firms. They underwrite new securities. Advantages:  They work to show firms are not lemons.  Long-run reputation at stake. Disadvantages:  Are they serving the firm or the client?

10 II. Banking Structure in the United States

11 Institutions... Commercial Banks  “Money Center” banks  Regional (& Super-) banks  Community Banks Savings Institutions  Lost 50% of deposits 1989 - 2001  1980s - Congress relaxes lending rules Credit Unions  1934-strict member rules; relaxed since.  no fed’l tax -  deposit rates &  loan rates

12 Commercial Bank Assets ($ Billions), January 2009 Commercial & industrial loans 1,601.1 13.6% Consumer loans 869.8 7.4% Real estate loans 3,805.0 32.2% Interbank loans 389.8 3.3% Other loans 915.6 7.7% Total loans 7,581.3 64.1% U.S. government securities 1,273.0 10.8% Other securities 872.77.4% Total securities 2,145.7 18.2% Cash assets 967.3 8.2% Other assets 1,123.6 9.5% Total assets 11,817.9 100.0% June 2013 1,546.8 11.4% 1,136.5 8.4% 3,542.2 26.1% 123.5 0.9% 941.6 6.9% 7,302.8 53.9% 1,838.9 13.6% 891.16.6% 2,730.0* 20.1% 2,144.4 15.8% 1,383.8 10.2% 13,548.8 100.0% * $1,357.4 bill. is in mortgaged- backed securities (MBS)

13 Commercial Bank Liabilities and Equity Capital ($ Billions), January 2010 Transactions deposits 810.3 Small time and savings deposits 4,974.3 Large time deposits 1,865.8 Total deposits 7,650.4 Borrowings from banks $ 261.1 Other borrowings 1,636.6 Total borrowings 1,887.7 Trading liabilities 261.2 Other liabilities 399.1 Equity capital 1,273.4 Total liabilities & equity 11,451.8 7.1% 43.4% 16.2% 66.8% 2.2% 14.3% 16.5% 2.2% 3.5% 11.1% 100.0% June 2013 --- --- 7,882.158.2% 1,546.3 11.4% 9,428.469.6% 142.21.0% 1,385.110.2% 1,527.2* 11.3% 237.31.7% 448.43.3% 1,511.8 11.2% 13,548.8 100.0%

14 Commercial Bank Asset Allocations

15 Commercial Bank Liabilities and Equity Capital

16 Misc. Data on Banks & Savings Institutions (FDIC)

17 Misc. Data on Credit Unions (FDIC)

18 The Top Ten Banks* Based on Deposits in the United States (FRS) FRS *Bank Holding Companies As of March 31, 2014 Assets in thousands of dollars.

19 Sources of Commercial Bank Revenues Commercial Bank Expenses

20 Equity as a Percentage of Bank Assets in the United States, 1840–Present

21 Evolution of theories of bank management & risk. Real bills doctrineReal bills doctrine Shiftability theoryShiftability theory Anticipated incomeAnticipated income Conversion of fundsConversion of funds Gap managementGap management Duration gap managementDuration gap management

22 Real bills doctrine – managing liquidity riskReal bills doctrine – managing liquidity risk Shiftability theory Anticipated income Conversion of funds Gap management Duration gap management  Make low-risk loans with high liquidity…  Lend to finance shipment of goods:  Lend to finance shipment of goods: -- paid off quickly to known buyer. -- earns low return.  Lend for production…  Lend for production… -- “self-liquidating” loans; repaid as sold. -- relatively low risk.

23 Real bills doctrine Shiftability theory – managing credit riskShiftability theory – managing credit risk Anticipated income Conversion of funds Gap management Duration gap management   Return with longer-term loans…   Return with longer-term loans… -- adds to the default risk. -- offset with purchases of gov’t. securities. - “Secondary reserves” add liquidity.  Popular until the Crash of 1929:  Popular until the Crash of 1929: -- falling prices means converting to cash involves a capital loss. -- exacerbated circumstances, as loans were going into default as well.

24 Real bills doctrine Shiftability theory Anticipated income - managing interest rate riskAnticipated income - managing interest rate risk Conversion of funds Gap management Duration gap management  Initiation of the “installment loan”…  Initiation of the “installment loan”… -- mitigates default risk through ongoing payments. -- gives the bank a highly predictable stream of income. -- has features that make it a “super- liquidating” loan.

25 Real bills doctrine Shiftability theory Anticipated income Conversion of funds - managing interest rate riskConversion of funds - managing interest rate risk Gap management Duration gap management  Match asset & liability maturities…  Match asset & liability maturities… -- long-term loans with CDs. -- short-term loans with deposits.  Events that change interest rates will be neutralized.

26 Real bills doctrine Shiftability theory Anticipated income Conversion of funds Gap Management – managing profit Duration gap managementGap Management – managing profit Duration gap management  Relate assets & liabilities by interest…  Relate assets & liabilities by interest… -- manage the “gap” to bank’s advantage. -- if r e is rising, then make gap positive. -- if r e is falling, then make gap negative.  Measure ave. time for payments (in or out)…  Measure ave. time for payments (in or out)… -- if positive and interest rates fall, bank profits rise. -- if negative and interest rates rise, profits rise.

27 Does Bank Size Matter? Economies of scale -- Efficient structure theory. -- Cost savings seem minor; mgt. savings. Concentration will... -- raise costs? -- lower costs? Consolidation stats (1990 vs. 2007): Community bank % of total bank assets: 22% v. 11% Top 10 bank % of total bank assets: 17% v. 40%

28 Universal Banking Banks own firms -- Better informed about financial condition. -- Conflict of interest? Firms own banks -- Does the FED regulate the firm as well? Banks do... Whatever (economies of scope): -- Insurance. -- Real estate. -- Stock brokers.

29 Banking in the U. S. ECO 473 Dr. D. Foster I. Asymmetric Information II. Structure

30 Case: Bank Branching in Illinois Very restrictive branching laws.Very restrictive branching laws.  “Unit banking” only, as per 1870 state constitution.  1967 - banks could build a “drive up” facility within 1500 feet of the unit bank.  1985 - banks could have 5 offices; 2 could be in other counties if within 10 miles.  1993 – prohibitions on branching removed. June, 2006 – 4,349 branch banking offices.June, 2006 – 4,349 branch banking offices.

31 Why deregulate? -- Tech. change. -- Failing banks. -- Profit potential. -- Legal environment.Why deregulate? -- Tech. change. -- Failing banks. -- Profit potential. -- Legal environment. Case: Bank Branching in Illinois


Download ppt "Banking in the U. S. ECO 473 Dr. D. Foster I. Asymmetric Information II. Structure."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google