1. NEW FLIGHT PATHS AND STANSTED SECOND RUNWAY PRESENTATION TO STANSTEAD ABBOTTS PARISH COUNCIL 17 JULY 2008

2. New Flight Paths Overview and changes proposed Impact on Stanstead Abbotts Noise disturbance NATS consultation

3. Overview of TCN and Changes Proposed (1) TCN region over 12 million people across five counties Changes out to 2014 Effects arrival routes, holds and departure routes Airlines are NATS customers and major shareholders

4. Overview of TCN and Changes Proposed (2) Heathrow, Stansted, Luton, London City, Northolt + smaller airports and military airfields Not all routes are being changed Excludes Stansted 2 nd runway First phase of plans out to 2030 to align with ATWP

5. TCN Region

6. One Day’s Flight Paths through TCN in 2006

7. Tranquility Map 2006

8. Tranquility Map with Departures and Arrivals

9. Impact on Stanstead Abbotts New Stansted easterly arrival route New Luton departure routes New Northolt departure routes Concentration on route centrelines Overflying less densely populated areas

10. Current Stansted Easterly Arrivals

11. Proposed Stansted Easterly Arrivals

12. STANSTED MOUNTFITCHET BISHOP’S STORTFORD

13. Current Luton Easterly Departures to SE

14. Proposed Luton Easterly Departures to SE

15. Summary of impact on Stanstead Abbotts Stansted arrival change beneficial Luton and Northolt change slightly beneficial Overall beneficial with traffic at current levels

16. Noise Disturbance (1) Noise impact defined by number of people affected rather than amount of noise they are exposed to Routes moved to less densely populated areas Current tranquil areas will suffer from more noise

17. Noise Disturbance (2) Measured by Lmax levels But aircraft numbers and duration important factors Aircraft noise has low frequency and tonal characteristics which increase annoyance Low background noise environment

18. Equivalent Lmax Levels

19. NATS Consultation Closed on 19 June 2008 Results published on 22 July Implemented April 2009 onwards Can still write to CAA Copy your MP

20. Stansted Second Runway

21. Maximum use of R1 BAA wants increase from 25 to 35 mppa Flights increase from 550 to 700 per day Could eventually be 45 or 50 mppa Awaiting Govt decision Delayed since BAA admitted understating pollution and road traffic impacts AND passenger numbers are now falling

22. Second Runway Before R1 decided, BAA lodged R2 application Will be called in for Public Inquiry Starts next year and last 12+ months Inspector submits report in 2010 Government decision in 2011

25. Second Runway Massive 2½ square mile land grab + more for buffer zone Destruction of 73 homes including 13 listed buildings Triple the passengers to 68 million Flights increase from 550 to 1380 per day Extra 11 million tonnes air pollution per year

28. Hertford East Train Services Currently basic service 2 trains/hour (3/hour peak) suffering high levels of overcrowding Particularly Liverpool Street service since some now have Stratford as destination STEX services with 4 trains/hour eat up capacity Network Rail looking at longer trains and additional tracks BAA assume airport rail work complete end-2017 Without better services before airport expansion, Hertford East service will get worse

31. All UK wind farms save 4½ million tonnes per year Only equates to ⅔ year full use of existing runway

32. Opposition to Second Runway Parish, District, County Councils East of England Regional Authority MPs and MEPs Conservation Groups SSE’s 7,000 members Local communities

33. What you can do Respond to R2 consultation to Uttlesford District Council by 26 September Copy your MP Support SSE R2 is not inevitable – WE CAN WIN

34. Airport expansion = more noise + more CO 2 emissions Root Cause

35. QUESTIONS AND ANSWER S