Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJanel Cross Modified over 9 years ago
1
Risk Assessment - Scientific Challenges A Perspective from the NanoSafety Project Team
Jutta Jahnel
2
NanoSafety Project NanoSafety – Risk Governance of Manufactured Nanoparticles Commissioned by STOA, carried out by KIT-ITAS, Karlsruhe (project coordination) and ITA, Vienna as members of ETAG STOA Project Supervisor: Prof. Vittorio Prodi, MEP Duration: January 2010 – October 2011 The project deals with the governance of the potential environmental, health and safety risks of manufactured nanoparticles, the challenges for risk assessment and risk management and the regulation under uncertainty Focus: Risk and concern assessments as well as risk management strategies as discussed or proposed for the EU or its member states | Jutta Jahnel | ITAS |
3
Preconditions for risk assessment study
The presented results are based on an up-to-date literature review Working definition: Manufactured Particulate Nanomaterials (MPN) Focus: safety objective „human health“ Risk assessment is a prerequisite of science-based risk management and means the quantification of the probability of harmful effects caused by exposure to an agent Situation:There is no generally accepted paradigm for risk assessment for nanomaterials or products containing them Question: Could scientific data provide appropriate knowledge for policy makers to perform risk assessment? | Jutta Jahnel | ITAS |
4
Risk Assessment Paradigm
According to OECD (2003): Environment Directorate. Description of selected key generic terms used in chemical/hazard assessment. OECD Series on Testing and Assessment Number 44. ENV/JM/MONO(2003). | Jutta Jahnel | ITAS |
5
Toxicity Tests for Hazard Assessment
Nanotoxicology uses classical tools from toxicology: Cell-free assays: properties like solubility, reactivity, agglomeration state, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generating potential In vitro assays: biological tests with primary cells, cell-lines, organs Challenge: potential evidence for human disease? In vivo studies: effects on a whole living organism – laboratory animals - (acute/chronic toxicity, skin, respiratory and gastrointestinal tract) Challenge: extrapolation of the data to humans, extrapolation from higher to lower doses, safety factors? Human and epidemiological studies: occurrence and distributions of diseases in populations Challenge: diseases caused by which kind of kown or unknown hazard endpoint? | Jutta Jahnel | ITAS |
6
Toxicity Mechanisms for Hazard Assessment
Hazard endpoints: Structure – toxicity relationship (free radical activity, chemical reactivity) Increased production of reactive molecules like (ROS) Inflammation (recruiting immune cells) Genotoxicity (damage or changes of the DNA) Cytotoxicity Predicting ? Identification ? Safety endpoints (impact on human health): Respiratory, cardiovascular disease, allergic sensitisation Fibrosis, cancer, bronchitis, immunopathology (asthma) | Jutta Jahnel | ITAS |
7
Material based View: Exposure Scenarios
Material (chemical composition) Manufacturing Manufacturing Application Human Uptake, distribution, accumulation Disease Suspended Embedded Surface bound others cosmetics Size distribution Morphology Aggregation others Form 1 Mat. 1 food Form 2 Consumer Mat. 2 others others others Worker Public Environment | Jutta Jahnel | ITAS |
8
Limitations for Exposure Assessment
Lack of labelling and registration of nanoproducts Missing lifecycle assessment of nanoproducts Measurement and detection: MPN undergo changes during transmission into the environment, difficulty to differentiate engineered from non-engineered materials Insufficient data available | Jutta Jahnel | ITAS |
9
Entry into the Human Body (Uptake)
Lung: most important port of entry for airborne particles, uptake via inhalation, occupational exposure Nasal cavity: uptake via inhalation, direct exposition of the olfactory nerve Gastro-intestinal tract: MPN can cross epithelial, endothelial barries, only very few studies available, important entry for food applications Skin: penetration of damaged skin can not be excluded, important entry for cosmetic applications Parenteral via direct injection (medical context with own criteria for risk assessment) | Jutta Jahnel | ITAS |
10
Translocation and Distribution (ADME profile)
Penetration through the air–blood tissue barrier in the lung Penetration of the blood-brain barrier and blood-placenta barrier Transport by the lymphatic system Transport into secondary organs Enrichment in liver, spleen, kidneys, reaching heart Very little is known about the metabolization, excretion and elimination There are different kind of hazards: at sites of deposition, due to translocation from pulmonary portal of entry into the blood, systemic consequences could in theory result in additional health effects like neurophysiological diseases | Jutta Jahnel | ITAS |
11
Challenges for Risk Assessment
Definition of Manufactured Particulate Nanomaterials (MPNs) – a large variety of materials, different sizes and forms with a lack of common characteristics beside the nanoscale, no hazard classes Detection (biological, technical matrices) and characterisation: intrinsic limitations Dose and amount of MPN: missing concept Dose = total amount of substance / time period amount: mass? surface area? particle number? reactivity? Methodology for Hazard Assessment: classical toxicology, lack of standardised methods, appropriate controls, suitability of high dose in vitro or in vivo studies Exposure assessment: insufficient data for occupational, environmental and consumer scenarios, acute and chronic exposure Case by case assessment (full dataset for every kind of MPN) Reliable evidence for risk assessment only for a small selection of high abundant MPNs | Jutta Jahnel | ITAS |
12
Conclusions for Selected MPN
Relevant Properties Toxicity Mechanisms Relevent Exposure Relevant Uptake Carbon nanotubes Form Number of walls Functionalisation Metallic impurities Production of ROS Inflammation Cytotoxicity Occupational Lung (inhalation) Fullerenes Chemical structure Surface modification Water solubility Genotoxicity Cancerogenicity Cosmetics Skin (dermal) Nano-TiO2 Neurotoxicity Spray applications Nano-Ag Release of Ag Drugs Wound-dressings ENRHES (2010): Engineered Nanoparticles: Review of Health and Environmental Safety. | Jutta Jahnel | ITAS |
13
Recent Toxicological Research Situation
Published interpretations of experimental results, especially those regarding potential impacts on human health and on the environment, are still insufficient, contradictory and controversial (concerns about quality, comparability and relevance) Results of ‚no effects‘-experiments are usually not published Questionable extrapolation of laboratory data (hazard endpoints) to an human health impact (safety endpoint) Filling knowledge gaps by modelling, meta-analysis, well-linked and cross-talk between nanomedicine, nanoengineering and nanosafety (interdisciplinarity) Systemic view in addition to separate analytic views for providing useful answers that can be translated into actions Pragmatic preliminary risk assessment (levels of concern, risk classes) Criteria: physico-chemical properties, exposure, extent of knowledge | Jutta Jahnel | ITAS |
14
Thank You for Your Attention
Project Team: Ulrich Fiedeler Julia Haslinger Myrtill Simko Torsten Fleischer Jutta Jahnel Stefanie Seitz Jutta Schimmelpfeng | Jutta Jahnel | ITAS |
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.