1. 2014-2 Regular Cycle Amendment 2014-2 Small Scale Amendment And Concurrent Rezoning Requests Adoption Public Hearings January 27, 2015

2. Amendment 2014-2-A-5-1 / Rezoning RZ-14-11-015 Agent: Donald W. McIntosh, Jr., Donald W. McIntosh Associates, Inc. Owner:Vaughan Industrial Properties, LLC From:Industrial (IND) & I-2/I-3 To:Medium Density Residential (MDR) & R-3 Acreage:16.62 gross Proposed Use: 332 multifamily residential dwelling units

3. 2014-2-A-5-1 / RZ-14-11-015 Location

4. Aerial 2014-2-A-5-1 / RZ-14-11-015

5. Future Land Use 2014-2-A-5-1 / RZ-14-11-015

6. Future Land Use (Proposed) 2014-2-A-5-1 / RZ-14-11-015

7. Zoning 2014-2-A-5-1 / RZ-14-11-015

8. Zoning (Proposed)

9. 2014-2-A-5-1 Public Notification  Recommended Minimum: 500 feet Public Notification Task Force  Provided: 700 feet Comprehensive Plan Amendment  Orange County Code Requirement: 300 feet Sec. 30-40(c)(3)a  Provided: 900 feet Rezoning

10. 2014-2-A-5-1 Staff Recommendation:Adopt LPA Recommendation:Adopt  Make a finding of consistency with the Comprehensive Plan (see Future Land Use Element Policies FLU1.4.16, FLU2.2.15, and FLU8.2.1);  Determine that the proposed amendment is in compliance; and  Transmit Amendment 2014-1-A-5-1, Industrial (IND) to Medium Density Residential (MDR) Action Requested

11. Rezoning RZ-14-11-015 Staff Recommendation:Approve PZC Recommendation: Approve Make a finding of consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and recommend approval of the requested R-3 (Multiple- Family Dwelling District) zoning subject to two (2) restrictions: 1)The rezoning shall not become effective until the future land use designation is in effect. 2)Development shall be restricted to a maximum of 332 multi-family dwelling units. Action Requested

12. Rezoning RZ-14-11-015 Staff Recommendation:Approve PZC Recommendation: Approve subject to three (3) additional restrictions: Make a finding of consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and recommend approval of the requested R-3 (Multiple- Family Dwelling District) zoning subject to three (3) additional restrictions: 1)Noeast-facing rear or side façade of an apartment building shall be located within 100 feet of Goldenrod Road. 1)No east-facing rear or side façade of an apartment building shall be located within 100 feet of Goldenrod Road. 3)Access to the American Legion property shall be provided from the internal private roadway extending westerly from Goldenrod Road. A cross-access and ingress/egress easement shall be granted along the internal private roadway from the Goldenrod Road right-of-way to the western boundary of the American Legion property. 4)Miami curb shall be installed along the north side of the internal private roadway within the cross-access and ingress/egress easement adjacent to the American Legion property. Action Requested

13. Regular Cycle Ordinance State Expedited Review Amendments Action Requested Make a finding of consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, determine that the amendments are in compliance, and recommend adoption of an Ordinance, consistent with today’s actions, approving the proposed Future Land Use Map Amendment.

14. 2014-2 Privately Initiated Small Scale Amendment and Concurrent Rezoning Request Adoption Public Hearings January 27, 2015

15. Amendment 2014-2-S-5-1 Rezoning LUPA-14-07-185 Agent: Jonathan Dorman Owner:Inglese Enterprises, LLC and Rocco and Megan English From:Planned Development – Office (PD-O) and R-1A (Single-Family Dwelling District) and PD (Planned Development District) (State Farm Building PD) To:Planned Development – Commercial (PD-C) and PD (Planned Development District) (University Storage and Office PD) Acreage:5.66 gross acres/4.9 net acres Proposed Use: 80,000 sq. ft. of self-storage and 5,000 sq. ft. of office development

16. 2014-2-S-5-1 / LUPA-14-07-185 Location

17. 2014-2-S-5-1 / LUPA-14-07-185 Aerial

18. 2014-2-S-5-1 / LUPA-14-07-185 Future Land Use

19. 2014-2-S-5-1 / LUPA-14-07-185 Future Land Use (Proposed)

20. 2014-2-S-5-1 / LUPA-14-07-185 Zoning

21. 2014-2-S-5-1 / LUPA-14-07-185 Zoning (Proposed)

22. 2014-2-S-5-1 / LUPA-14-07-185 Proposed PD Land Use Plan

23. 2014-2-S-5-1 / LUPA-14-07-185 The applicant has agreed to the following:  Horizon West architectural standards for self-storage facilities  Three-foot knee wall along University Boulevard  Interior loading activity and traffic flow  Prohibit access to parcels to the north  Buildings fronting University Blvd. shall be limited to 2 stories/30 ft. and 45 ft. for architectural features  Permanent 20 ft. easement for a private driveway  Finished floor elevations shall be set using the base flood elevation in effect or elevation 48.4 (NAVD ’88), whichever is higher

24. 2014-2-S-5-1 / LUPA-14-07-185 Proposed Floodplain Elevations

25. 2014-2-S-5-1 Staff Recommendation:Adopt LPA Recommendation:Adopt  Make a finding of consistency with the Comprehensive Plan (see Future Land Use Element Goal FLU2; Future Land Use Element Objective FLU8.2; Future Land Use Element Policies FLU1.1.5, FLU1.4.4, FLU8.2.10, and FLU8.2.11; Neighborhood Element Objective N1.1; and Conservation Element Policy C1.4.1);  Determine that the amendment is in compliance; and  Adopt Amendment 2014-2-S-5-1, Planned Development- Office (PD-O) to Planned Development-Commercial (PD-C) Action Requested

26. LUPA-14-07-185 DRC Recommendation: Approve subject to twenty-six (26) conditions  Make a finding of consistency with the Comprehensive Plan (see Future Land Use Element Goal FLU2; Future Land Use Element Objective FLU8.2; Future Land Use Element Policies FLU1.1.5, FLU1.4.4, FLU8.2.10, and FLU8.2.11; Neighborhood Element Objective N1.1; and Conservation Element Policy C1.4.1) and  Approve Rezoning Case LUPA-14-07-185, R-1A (Single- Family Dwelling District) and PD (Planned Development District) to PD (Planned Development District), subject to the twenty-six (26) conditions  Approve Rezoning Case LUPA-14-07-185, R-1A (Single- Family Dwelling District) and PD (Planned Development District) to PD (Planned Development District), subject to the twenty-six (26) conditions listed in the staff report Action Requested

27. LUPA-14-07-185 DRC Recommendation: Approve, subject to twenty-six (26) conditions 1.Development shall conform to the University Storage & Office Land Use Plan dated "Received January 21, 2015," and shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and county laws, ordinances, and regulations, except to the extent that any applicable county laws, ordinances, or regulations are expressly waived or modified by any of these conditions. Accordingly, the PD may be developed in accordance with the uses, densities, and intensities described in such Land Use Plan, subject to those uses, densities, and intensities conforming with the restrictions and requirements found in the conditions of approval and complying with all applicable federal, state, and county laws, ordinances, and regulations, except to the extent that any applicable county laws, ordinances, or regulations are expressly waived or modified by any of these conditions. If the development is unable to achieve or obtain desired uses, densities, or intensities, the County is not under any obligation to grant any waivers or modifications to enable the developer to achieve or obtain those desired uses, densities, or intensities. In the event of a conflict or inconsistency between a condition of approval of this land use plan and the land use plan dated "Received January 21, 2015," the condition of approval shall control to the extent of such conflict or inconsistency.

28. LUPA-14-07-185 DRC Recommendation: Approve subject to twenty-six (26) conditions 2.This project shall comply with, adhere to, and not deviate from or otherwise conflict with any verbal or written promise or representation made by the applicant (or authorized agent) to the Board of County Commissioners at the public hearing where this development was approved, where such promise or representation, whether oral or written, was relied upon by the Board in approving the development, could have reasonably been expected to have been relied upon by the Board in approving the development, or could have reasonably induced or otherwise influenced the Board to approve the development. For purposes of this condition, a "promise" or "representation" shall be deemed to have been made to the Board by the applicant (or authorized agent) if it was expressly made to the Board at a public hearing where the development was considered or approved. 3.Pursuant to Section 125.022, Florida Statutes, issuance of this development permit by the County does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the County for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. Pursuant to Section 125.022, the applicant shall obtain all other applicable state or federal permits before commencement of development.

29. LUPA-14-07-185 DRC Recommendation: Approve subject to twenty-six (26) conditions 4.Unless the property is otherwise vested or exempt, the applicant must apply for and obtain a Capacity Encumbrance Letter prior to construction plan submittal and must apply for and obtain a Capacity Reservation Certificate prior to approval of the plat. Nothing in this condition, and nothing in the decision to approve this Land Use Plan, shall be construed as a guarantee that the applicant will be able to satisfy the requirements for obtaining a Capacity Encumbrance Letter or a Capacity Reservation Certificate. 5.Due to roadway deficiencies in the area, the applicant will be required to submit a traffic study with the application for a Capacity Encumbrance Letter. 6.All acreages identified as conservation areas and wetland buffers are considered approximate until finalized by a Conservation Area Determination (CAD) and a Conservation Area Impact (CAI) Permit. Approval of this plan does not authorize any direct or indirect conservation area impacts.

30. LUPA-14-07-185 DRC Recommendation: Approve subject to twenty-six (26) conditions 7.Prior to construction plan approval, hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to Orange County Utilities demonstrating that proposed water and wastewater systems have been designed to support all development within the PD. 8.Outside sales, storage, and display shall be prohibited. 9.Tree removal/earthwork shall not occur unless and until construction plans for the first Preliminary Subdivision Plan and/or Development Plan, with a tree removal and mitigation plan, have been approved by Orange County. 10.Pole signs and billboards shall be prohibited. Ground and fascia signs shall comply with Orange County Code Chapter 31.5. 11.The applicant has offered, and the County has agreed, that the self-storage facility shall be subject to 24-hour video surveillance, and all access points shall be gated with keypad entrance.

31. LUPA-14-07-185 DRC Recommendation: Approve subject to twenty-six (26) conditions 12.Access to self-storage units is available 24 hours/7 days a week with keypad access. Office hours for the self-storage facility shall be limited to 8 a.m. – 6 p.m. Monday – Saturday and 10 a.m. – 3 p.m. on Sunday. 13.A fifty-foot (50’) wide buffer shall be provided along the northern and western PD boundaries. 14.Approval of this PD Amendment shall void the previously-approved State Farm Development Plan. 15.The Horizon West Village Center District architectural standards for self- storage facilities contained within Section 38-1398(c)(2)(d) of the Orange County Code shall apply. The self-storage facility shall comply with the Horizon West Self Storage Design Standards. 16.The use of the property shall be restricted to 80,000 square feet of self-storage and 5,000 square feet of P-O (Professional Office District) uses office only. 17.Access to neighboring parcels to the north via the subject property shall be prohibited. 18.A knee wall with a height of three (3) feet shall be constructed along University Boulevard to screen parking from view.

32. LUPA-14-07-185 DRC Recommendation: Approve subject to twenty-six (26) conditions 19.All loading activity and traffic flow associated with the self-storage units shall be confined to the interior of the project. 20.Public access via the exterior of the project shall be limited to visitors to the self-storage facility’s leasing office or the insurance agency. 21.No self-storage unit shall feature plumbing, interior lighting, or electrical outlets. 22.Businesses shall be prohibited from operating within any storage unit. 23.Except as amended, modified, and/or superseded, the following BCC Conditions of Approval, dated October 21, 2008, shall apply: The Developer shall obtain water and wastewater service from Orange County Utilities.

33. LUPA-14-07-185 DRC Recommendation: Approve subject to twenty-six (26) conditions 24.Proposed buildings shall be limited to a maximum of two (2) stories, with a maximum height of thirty (30) feet from the finished floor to the roof decking, and forty-five (45) feet above finished floor at architectural features. 25.The applicant shall deed a permanent twenty (20) foot access easement for a private driveway connecting University Boulevard to the property abutting the northern project boundary (PID #04-22-31-0000-00-026), to be located within the western 80-foot buffer. 26.The applicant shall set all finished floor elevations and calculate any floodplain impacts and mitigation for this development using the base flood elevation in effect at the time of permitting, or elevation 48.4 (NAVD '88), whichever is higher. ** Conditions 15 and 16 were modified and new Conditions 24 through 26 (proffered during the January 20, 2015 roundtable discussion) were added prior to the January 27, 2015 Board of County Commissioners hearing (deleted text; new text).

34. 2014-2 Staff Initiated Small Scale Amendments Adoption Public Hearings January 27, 2015

35. Request: Amendment to Future Land Use Element Policy FLU8.1.4 establishing the maximum densities and intensities for proposed Planned Developments within Orange County District:Countywide Amendment 2014-2-S-FLUE-1

36. 2014-2-S-FLUE-1 Staff Recommendation:Adopt LPA Recommendation:Adopt  Make a finding of consistency with the Comprehensive Plan;  Determine that the proposed amendment is in compliance; and  Adopt Amendment 2014-2-S-FLUE-1 Action Requested

37. Small Scale Development Ordinance Action Requested Make a finding of consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, determine that the amendments are in compliance, and recommend adoption of an Ordinance, consistent with today’s actions, approving the proposed Future Land Use Map and Text Amendments.

38. 2014-2 Regular Cycle Amendment 2014-2 Small Scale Amendment And Concurrent Rezoning Requests Adoption Public Hearings January 27, 2015