Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCatherine Bennett Modified over 9 years ago
1
AARHUS UNIVERSITY 1 HANS FYNBO Aarhus University Denmark 12 C and 3 studied with small accelerators 496 th WE-Heraeus-Seminar Bad Honnef February 6-10 2012 Introduction to the 3 reaction 3 breakup of the Hoyle state Search for “missing” states in 12 C
2
AARHUS UNIVERSITY 2 4 He +4 He -0.092 g.s. 0 + 8 Be 12 C g.s.0 +
3
AARHUS UNIVERSITY 3 4 He +4 He -0.092 g.s. 0 + 8 Be 7.650 + g.s.0 + 12 C 7.27 4.442 + 3
4
AARHUS UNIVERSITY 4 Q 1 = -92 keV Q 2 = -287 keV + 8 Be Hoyle state QuantityValueError(%) Q3Q3 379.4(2)keV1.2 rad / 4.12(11) ×10 -4 2.7 e+e- / 6.7(6) × 10 -4 9.2 e+e- 52.0(1.4) eV 2.7 Crannell 2005 e+e- 59.6(1.5) eV 2.5 Chernykh 2010 ( 8 Be)/ tot >0.964 Freer 1994 ( 8 Be)/ tot 0.83(5)6 Raduta 2011
5
AARHUS UNIVERSITY 12 C+ 40 Ca 25MeV/u 5
6
AARHUS UNIVERSITY 6 arXiv:1112.2136v1 [nucl-th] 3 -rate at low temperatures 8 Be resonance
7
AARHUS UNIVERSITY 12 C ≈10.3 (0 + ) 4.442 + g.s.0 + 7.650 + 9.643 - 10.841 - 7.27 Haruhiko Morinaga (TUM) J =2 + E≈9.7 MeV 2 + ? 3 -rate at high temperatures
8
AARHUS UNIVERSITY Phys. Lett. B 2011. Phys. Rev. C36 (1987) 54.. The et al. APJ 1998 Tur et al. APJ 2010 Magkotsios et al. APJs 2010 Magkotsios et al. APJ 2011
9
AARHUS UNIVERSITY 9 3 breakup of the Hoyle state Search for “missing” states in 12 C
10
AARHUS UNIVERSITY CMAM, Madrid 3 He+ 11 B d+ 12 C* d+3 @ 8.5 MeV 3 He Oliver Kirsebom (now at Triumf)
11
AARHUS UNIVERSITY 11 5000 events 12 C 12.71 1 + ≈10 0,2 + 4.44 2 + g.s. 0 + 7.65 0 + 9.64 3 - 10.84 1 - 11.83 2 - 7.27
12
AARHUS UNIVERSITY 12 Limits: Raduta et al. DDE = 7.5±4 % DDE = 9.5±4 % SD = 83±5 % (O. Kirsebom et al. to be submitted)
13
AARHUS UNIVERSITY 13 3 breakup of the Hoyle state Search for “missing” states in 12 C
14
AARHUS UNIVERSITY 14 2+?2+? Stellenbosch: Freer et al. (2009): 12 C(p,p´) 12 C Yale : Zimmerman et al. (2011): 12 C(p,p´) 12 C 3-3- 1-1- 3-3- 1-1- Osaka: Itoh et al. (2011): 12 C( , ´) 12 C 3-3- 3-3-
15
AARHUS UNIVERSITY 15 Journal of Physics: Conference Series 202 (2010) 012016 Journal of Physics: Conference Series 267 (2011) 012046
16
AARHUS UNIVERSITY Idea 1 : Remove 3 - state using -decay Only 0 +, 1 +, and 2 + states
17
AARHUS UNIVERSITY 12 N/ 12 B Magnetp/d 12 N/ 12 B+X 12 C/ 11 B Direct Kinematics+ISOL 12 N/ 12 B+X 12 N/ 12 B p/d 12 C/ 11 B Magnets Inverse Kinematics+Separator
18
AARHUS UNIVERSITY 18 R.Raabe 12 N/ 12 B K. Jungmann H. Wilschut TRI P separator Solveig Hyldegaard
19
AARHUS UNIVERSITY 1+1+ 12 C 12.711 + ≈100 + 4.442 + g.s.0 + 7.650 + 15.111 + 12 N Q beta =16.32
20
AARHUS UNIVERSITY 12 C 12.711 + ≈100 + 4.442 + g.s.0 + 7.650 + 15.111 + 12 B Q beta =13.37
21
AARHUS UNIVERSITY C. Diget (York) Solveig Hyldegaard 12 N/ 12 B IGISOL Experiment
22
AARHUS UNIVERSITY 22 12 C 12.71 1 + ≈10 4.44 2 + g.s. 0 + 7.65 0 + 15.11 1 + 12 N Q beta =16.32 Natural parity states
23
AARHUS UNIVERSITY 12 C 12.711 + ≈100 + 4.442 + g.s.0 + 7.650 + 15.111 + 12 B Q beta =13.37
24
AARHUS UNIVERSITY PL B678, 459 (2009) PR C80, 044304 (2009) PR C80, 034316 (2009) PR C81, 024303 (2010) S. Hyldegaard, C. Diget
25
AARHUS UNIVERSITY How to get selectivity between 0 + and 2 + ? × × 2+2+ Only 0 +, 1 +, and 2 + statesOnly 1 +, 2 +, and 3 + states
26
AARHUS UNIVERSITY “ -delayed” breakup C Oliver Kirsebom (Triumf) Martin Alcorta (Argonne)
27
AARHUS UNIVERSITY 3 He+ 10 B p+ 12 C* p+3 @ 4.9 MeV M. Alcorta et al., NIM A 605, 318–325 (2009) CMAM, Madrid 3 He+ 11 B d+ 12 C* d+3 @ 8.5 MeV 3 He
28
AARHUS UNIVERSITY O. S. Kirsebom et al., Phys. Lett. B680, 44-49 (2009) 1 st case : -decay of 1 + states (proof-of-principle) 3 He+ 10 B p+ 12 C* p+3 3 He
29
AARHUS UNIVERSITY 1 st case : -decay of 1 + states (proof-of-principle) M1 -decay ≈ GT -decay
30
AARHUS UNIVERSITY 2 nd case : -decay of 2 + T=1 state + M1 >> E2 1 +,2 +, 3 + no 0 + ! − E1 decay populate negative parity 1 -,2 -, 3 -
31
AARHUS UNIVERSITY 31 2+2+ 2-2- 1-1- 2+2+ 2-2- 1-1- 11 B(p, ) 400keV van de Graaf in Aarhus.
32
AARHUS UNIVERSITY 12 C 12.71 1 + ≈10 0,2 + 4.44 2 + g.s. 0 + 7.65 0 + 9.64 3 - 10.84 1 - 11.83 2 - 13.35 (2 - ) 14.08 4 + 15.11 1 + 7.27 16.1 2 +
33
AARHUS UNIVERSITY 33 12 C 12.71 1 + ≈10 0,2 + 4.44 2 + g.s. 0 + 7.65 0 + 9.64 3 - 10.84 1 - 11.83 2 - 13.35 (2 - ) 14.08 4 + 15.11 1 + 7.27 16.1 2 + 240h 1nA @ 165keV
34
AARHUS UNIVERSITY 34 12 C 12.71 1 + ≈10 0,2 + 4.44 2 + g.s. 0 + 7.65 0 + 9.64 3 - 10.84 1 - 11.83 2 - 13.35 (2 - ) 14.08 4 + 15.11 1 + 7.27 16.1 2 + 16.6 2 - 3 rd case : -decay of 2 - T=1 state 40h 1nA @ 350keV
35
AARHUS UNIVERSITY 35 C. Zemach, Phys Rev. 133 (1964) 1201 : Decay to 3 Fynbo et al. Phys Rev C79 (2009) 054009 : Decay to 3
36
AARHUS UNIVERSITY 36 2 + 16.11MeV 2 - 16.57MeV 11 B(p, )
37
AARHUS UNIVERSITY Outlook 5 MV van de Graaf in Aarhus (HV 1965) Upgrade of detector setup Other case where the method can be used? 8 Be 16 O …..
38
AARHUS UNIVERSITY 38 QuantityValueError(%) Q3Q3 379.38(20)keV1.2 rad / 4.12(11) ×10 -4 2.7 e+e- / 6.74(62) × 10 -4 9.2 e+e- 52.0(1.4) eV 2.7 Crannell 2005 e+e- 59.6(1.5) eV 2.5 Chernykh ( 8 Be)/ tot >0.964 Freer 1994 ( 8 Be)/ tot 0.83(5)6 Raduta 2011
39
AARHUS UNIVERSITY THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION !
40
AARHUS UNIVERSITY BONUS MATERIAL…
41
AARHUS UNIVERSITY Decay channels 4 He +4 He+ 4 He 7.650 + 3.032 + g.s.0 + -0.092 8 Be+ 4 He 12 C 7.27 12.711 + 15.111 + ≈10 0 + /2 + The 1 + states cannot decay via the 8 Be ground state because it would require L=1 and therefore a change in parity Natural parity states
42
AARHUS UNIVERSITY B(GT) B(M1) 1 +,T=1 B(M1) 2 +,T=1 Data FMD
43
AARHUS UNIVERSITY 12 C 12.711 + ≈10.3 (0 + ) 4.442 + g.s.0 + 7.650 + 9.643 - 10.841 - 11.832 - 13.35 (2 - ) 14.084 + 15.111 + 16.112 + 7.27 p+ 11 B 15.96
44
AARHUS UNIVERSITY 12 C 12.711 + ≈10.3 (0 + ) 4.442 + g.s.0 + 7.650 + 9.643 - 10.841 - 11.832 - 13.35 (2 - ) 14.084 + 15.111 + 16.112 + 7.27 p+ 11 B 15.96 Experimental Dalitz plots
45
AARHUS UNIVERSITY 12 C 12.711 + ≈10.3 (0 + ) 4.442 + g.s.0 + 7.650 + 9.643 - 10.841 - 11.832 - 13.35 (2 - ) 14.084 + 15.111 + 16.112 + 7.27 p+ 11 B 15.96 The 13.35 MeV state 2–2– 4–4– √ X
46
AARHUS UNIVERSITY 12 C 12.711 + ≈10.3 (0 + ) 4.442 + g.s.0 + 7.650 + 9.643 - 10.841 - 11.832 - 13.35 (2 - ) 14.084 + 15.111 + 16.112 + 7.27 p+ 11 B 15.96 The 11.83 MeV state 2–2– 2–2– 1) A.A.Korsheninnikov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 52 (1990) 2) H.Fynbo et al., PRL 91 (2003) 3) R.Alvarez-Rodriguez et al., PRL 99 (2007) 1)2) 3)
47
AARHUS UNIVERSITY 4 He +4 He 3.032 + -0.092 g.s.0 + 8 Be 7.650 + ≈10 0 +,2 + 8 Be 10 -16 s g.s.0 + 12 C 7.27 12 C* 4.442 + 47
48
AARHUS UNIVERSITY 12 C * 1 + 8 Be 1 + 2 + 3 E 1 = m 23 /(m 1 +m 23 ) x Q I = 2/3 xQ I 12 C 8 Be 2 + 3 QIQI Q II E1E1 E2E2 E 3 ii 2/3Q I R.H. Dalitz, Philos. Mag. 44, 1068 (1953). Energy conservation Momentum conservation Dalitz plot
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.