Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMartina Payne Modified over 9 years ago
1
Do Static Weights Really Matter? Bowl Expo Monday, June 27, 2011
6
From Ball Motion Study Skid y = -mx + b Hook y = ax 2 + bx + c Roll y = mx + b
11
Full Factorial Designs # of runs = 2 k 6 Factor Full Factorial 2 6 = 64 runs Fractional Factorial Designs # of runs = 2 k – n 6 Factor Half Fractional 2 6 – 1 = 32 Runs
12
Sparsity of effects principle Higher order interactions are very rare Resolution 6 Main Effects confounded with 5-way 2-way confounded with 4-way, 3-way 3-way confounded with other 3-way Resolution and Confounding
13
6 Factor – Half Fraction DOE 2 6 - 1 A center point was also ran.
14
6 Factor – Half Fraction DOE 2 6 - 1
15
From Ball Motion Study Skid y = -mx + b Hook y = ax 2 + bx + c Roll y = mx + b
16
6 Factor, Half Fraction DOE
27
Our Understanding of Ball Motion Side Top/Bottom Finger/Thumb -5.8755.875 -3.75 3.75 -3.75 -1 -3-33 1 -1 1
28
Phase II – Response Surface Design Factorial Design Factorial Design Center point Center point Axial Points Axial Points
29
3 Factor Central Composite Design
30
Test Ball Data
31
3 Factor Central Composite DOE
34
Influence to Overall Ball Motion - Central Composite
35
Skid y = -mx + b Hook y = ax 2 + bx + c Roll y = mx + b Terms A B C AA BB CC AB AC BC Intended Path at 49’ X X X Intended Path at 60’ X X X X Average Path at 49’ X X X X
36
Skid y = -mx + b Hook y = ax 2 + bx + c Roll y = mx + b Terms A B C AA BB CC AB AC BC Vel Dec at 49’ X X Δ in Angle to HP at 49’ X X 1st Transition X X X
37
Skid y = -mx + b Hook y = ax 2 + bx + c Roll y = mx + b Terms A B C AA BB CC AB AC BC 2nd Transition Skid Slope X X Roll Slope X X
38
Skid y = -mx + b Hook y = ax 2 + bx + c Roll y = mx + b Terms A B C AA BB CC AB AC BC Total Angular Displacement X X X X Hook Length A Score X X X
39
Skid y = -mx + b Hook y = ax 2 + bx + c Roll y = mx + b Terms A B C AA BB CC AB AC BC Breakpoint X X 1st Transition to BP X X X 2nd Transition to BP
41
“Center Point” Analysis Within the -1 oz to +1 oz box
42
“Center Point” Analysis Average at 49’ 2.274 Average at 60’ 4.268 Intended at 60’ 4.06 Roll Slope 0.1602 8.12 boards8.536 boards4.548 boards Coefficient Influence From -1 oz to 1 oz of Side Weight
43
“Center Point” Analysis (60, 22.88) (60, 14.94)
45
Influence to Overall Ball Motion - Central Composite
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.