Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLindsey Boone Modified over 9 years ago
1
John E. Hibbard North American ALMA Science Center (NAASC/NRAO) Josh Barnes Institute for Astronomy U. Hawai’i (simulating the dynamics of the…) Gas in Interacting Galaxies “Gas & Stars in Galaxies: A Multi-wavelength 3D perspective” ESO, Garching, June 10-13 2008
2
Peculiar Galaxies: dynamically unrelaxed (non-equilibrium) forms Toomre Sequence of On-going Mergers (Toomre 1977) from Arp Atlas of Peculiar Galaxies (Arp 1966)
3
5%-10% of population in local universe In UGC, ~600 out of 9000 galaxies (~7%) with morphological descriptions including: disrupted, distorted, disturbed, interacting, eruptive, peculiar, bridge, loop, plume, tail, jet, streamer, connected (note, some are multiple systems, but not all need be interacting) Total fraction that went through a peculiar phase = %peculiar * T/ t peculiar
4
Morphologies (& Kinematics!) can be explained by galaxy-galaxy interactions Seminal Paper (1369 citations): Toomre & Toomre 1972
5
Neutral Hydrogen in Galaxies B/W=optical image of NGC 6946 from Digital Sky Survey Blue=Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope 21 cm image of Neutral Hydrogen (Boomsma 2007 PhD Thesis) Neutral Hydrogen is the raw fuel for all star formation Hydrogen usually much more extended than stars
6
Dynamically cold & extended HI responds strongly to the tidal forces M81/M82/NGC3077 VLA 12-pointing mosaic Yun et al. 1994
8
HI contours on DSS: van der Hulst, 1977, PhD. Thesis HI kinematics strongly affirmed interaction hypothesis
9
Spectral Line Maps are inherently 3-dimensional
10
For illustrations, You must choose between many 2- dimensional projections 1-D Slices along velocity axis = line profiles 2-D Slices along velocity axis = channel maps Slices along spatial dimension = position velocity profiles Integration along the velocity axis = moment maps
11
“Channel Maps” spatial distribution of line flux at each successive velocity setting
12
Emission from channel maps contoured upon an optical image
13
Moment Maps Zeroth Moment Integrated flux First Moment mean velocity Second Moment velocity dispersion
14
Position-Velocity Profiles Slice or Sum the line emission over one of the two spatial dimensions, and plot against the remaining spatial dimension and velocity Susceptible to projection effects +250 km/s-250 km/s +250 km/s
15
Rotating datacubes gives complete picture of data, noise, and remaining systematic effects Karma “xray” package & Oosterloo “cube2mpeg”
16
Rotations emphasize kinematic continuity and help separate out projection effects 3-D rendering program “xray” in the Karma visualization package & “cube2mpeg” http://www.atnf.csiro.au/computing/ software/visualisation/ http://www.atnf.csiro.au/computing/ software/karma/ Gooch, R.E., 1996, "Karma: a Visualisation Test-Bed"Gooch, R.E., 1996, "Karma: a Visualisation Test-Bed", in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, ASP Conf. Series vol. 101, ed. G.H. Jacoby & J. Barnes, ASP, San Francisco, p.80-83, ISSN 1080-7926
17
Rotations emphasize kinematic continuity and help separate out projection effects 3-D rendering program “xray” in the Karma visualization package & “cube2mpeg” http://www.atnf.csiro.au/c omputing/software/visuali sation/ http://www.atnf.csiro.au/c omputing/software/karma / http://www.atnf.csiro.au/c omputing/software/karma / Gooch, R.E., 1996, "Karma: a Visualisation Test-Bed", in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, ASP Conf. Series vol. 101, ed. G.H. Jacoby & J. Barnes, ASP, San Francisco, p.80- 83, ISSN 1080-7926 Gooch, R.E., 1996, "Karma: a Visualisation Test-Bed"
18
3rd dimension allows us to construct more accurate numerical models “Identikit” Mk 0 Hibbard 1995
19
A few dozen model “matches” to interacting galaxies have been published Only a handful “match” spatially resolved kinematics
20
Models of binary interactions have a large parameter space
21
Model Matching: the Hard Way Build two model galaxies (B+D+H; Barnes 1988; Barnes & Hernquist 1996) Select 1 encounter geometry; run
22
Model Matching: the Hard Way Run model Match Build another & run Compare; decide how to change params Etc… Takes ~50 trials to get decent fit to simple forms (N7252 Hibbard & Mihos 1995; N4676 Hibbard & Barnes 1997)
23
HI: Hibbard & van Gorkom 1996; CO: Yun & Hibbard 2001; H : Mihos et al. 1993 Identikit Mk 0: 1 simulation per disk geometry
24
Identikit Mk 0.5: 9x18x2=324 simulations in one
25
Identikit Mk 1: simulate all disk geometries Populate live halo with swarm of test particles on circular orbits Display only test particles with initial angular momentum closely aligned with desired disks
26
Test: generate 36 random BDH simulation & match generate 36 random BDH self-consistent N- body simulations Read into Identikit & Match Subjectively grade fit: good, fair, poor Check fit vs. actual parameters Barnes & Hibbard 2008 submitted
27
Identikit interactive modeling tool
30
Red=“good” fits Black=“fair” fits Cyan=“poor” fits Disk orientation parameters Viewing Angles Disk orientation All fits: 25deg Good fits: 10deg Viewing angles All fits: 25deg Good fits: 8deg
31
Red=“good” fits Black=“fair” fits Cyan=“poor” fits Time since pericenter Pericentric Separation Time since pericenter All fits: 14% Good fits: 9% Pericentric separation All fits: 25% Good fits: 15%
32
Red=“good” fits Black=“fair” fits Cyan=“poor” fits Linear Scale Factor Velocity Scale Factor Linear scale factor All fits: 16% Good fits: 10% Velocity scale factor* All fits: 15% Good fits: 5%
33
Identikit interactive modeling tool Can match models fairly well Models judged as good fits are better able to recover true parameters Perhaps more importantly, models that do not recover true parameters are judged as fair/poor fits (no false positives) Caveat: simulated “real” systems had the same radial mass profile as Identikit models
34
Tools like Identikit 1 can greatly speed model matching process Hibbard, 1993-1997: Identikit 0 for N7252, N4676, N4038 ~50 simulations per system, ~2mo each Barnes, 2008: Identikit 1: matched 36 systems in ~1 mo
35
Why bother matching? So you know some angles and scale factors, so what?
36
Time Evolution System made first pass ~220 Myr ago; will merge in ~40 Myr 1 million particle simulation of best fitting parameters http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/~barnes/pressrel/antfacts/
37
3-dimensional structure of The Antennae http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/~barnes/pressrel/antfacts/
38
Why is base of northern tail devoid of HI, while southern tail is gas rich? - Gas in northern tail has direct view of young SSCs with ionizing radiation - Gas in southern tail does not Simulation confirms that 3-D geometry is suitable for this interpretation
39
HI displacement could be due to ionization or RPS by wind fluid
40
NGC7252: HI streaming in from tidal tails Tails must extend back into remnant, but HI ends abruptly Gas is currently falling back into remnant at 1- 2 Mo/yr Tails must extend back into remnant, but HI ends abruptly Gas is currently falling back into remnant at 1- 2 Mo/yr Yet body remains devoid of HI
41
N-body simulation of NGC 4676 “The Mice” Barnes 2004 MNRAS; Hibbard & Barnes, in preparation Comparison with observations provides check on model prescriptions
42
N-body simulation of NGC 4676 “The Mice” Barnes 2004 MNRAS; Hibbard & Barnes, in preparation Comparison with observations provides check on model prescriptions
43
Next Generations telescopes require novel visualization approaches 2009: EVLA widar correlator 2:1 bandwidth ratios 16k-4M channels! 2012: ALMA 10 bands 4096 channels per IF Hundreds of atomic & molecular transitions in the mm-submm IN THE SAME DATA CUBES Both: All spectral mode, all the time
44
Imaging Chemistry in Galaxies IC 342 — Owens Valley Millimeter Array PC Axis 1: Density- weighted mean column density PC Axis 2: Shock tracers vs PDR molecules Gas density: CO, N 2 H +, HCN C 2 H: PDR Methanol, HCNO: shocks Meier & Turner 2005
46
Detected interstellar molecules H 2 HD H 3 + H 2 D+ CH CH + C 2 CH 2 C 2 H *C 3 CH 3 C 2 H 2 C 3 H(lin) c-C 3 H *CH 4 C 4 c-C 3 H 2 H 2 CCC(lin) C 4 H *C 5 *C 2 H 4 C 5 H H 2 C 4 (lin) *HC 4 H CH 3 C 2 H C 6 H *HC 6 H H 2 C 6 *C 7 H CH 3 C 4 H C 8 H *C 6 H 6 OH CO CO+ H 2 O HCO HCO+ HOC+ C 2 O CO 2 H 3 O+ HOCO+ H 2 CO C 3 O CH 2 CO HCOOH H 2 COH+ CH 3 OH CH 2 CHO CH 2 CHOH CH 2 CHCHO HC 2 CHO C 5 O CH 3 CHO c-C 2 H 4 O CH 3 OCHO CH 2 OHCHO CH 3 COOH CH 3 OCH 3 CH 3 CH 2 OH CH 3 CH 2 CHO (CH 3 ) 2 CO HOCH 2 CH 2 OH C 2 H 5 OCH 3 (CH 2 OH) 2 CO NH CN N 2 NH 2 HCN HNC N 2 H + NH 3 HCNH + H 2 CN HCCN C 3 N CH 2 CN CH 2 NH HC 2 CN HC 2 NC NH 2 CN C 3 NH CH 3 CN CH 3 NC HC 3 NH + *HC 4 N C 5 N CH 3 NH 2 CH 2 CHCN HC 5 N CH 3 C 3 N CH 3 CH 2 CN HC 7 N CH 3 C 5 N? HC 9 N HC 11 N NO HNO N2O HNCO NH2CHO SH CS SO SO+ NS SiH *SiC SiN SiO SiS HCl *NaCl *AlCl *KCl HF *AlF *CP PN H 2 S C 2 S SO 2 OCS HCS+ c-SiC 2 *SiCN *SiNC *NaCN *MgCN *MgNC *AlNC H 2 CS HNCS C 3 S c-SiC 3 *SiH 4 *SiC 4 CH 3 SH C 5 S FeO DEMIRM
47
END
48
HI traces diffuse gas; molecular gas traces denser gas & active regions CO on Optical (Wilson & Scoville 1999) CO on HI (Wang, Fall & Whitmore 2001)
49
Young star clusters Why is base of northern tail devoid of HI, while southern tail is gas rich? - gas in northern tail has direct view of young SSCs with ionizing radiation - Gas in southern tail does not Simulation confirms that 3-D geometry is suitable for this interpretation
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.