1. 2010 UBO/UBU Conference Title: Data Integrity Breakouts (Navy) DQ - FY12 Review List Input Session: R-4-1440-1700

2. Objectives Outline the annual DQMC Review List process. Identify what types of changes are made. Explain how to make a difference. 2

3. Bottom Line Up Front Your input is critical! 3

4. Annual DQMC Review List Process 4

5. What Types of Changes are Made (TMA Review List) Modify verbiage for clarification Additions – Augmentations to current requirement – New requirement Deletions – Parts of requirement – Entire requirement Re-Stratification Modify requirements Determine which questions will be on the Commander’s Statement 5

6. Navy Medicine DQMC Policy Provides clarification on TMA requirements that are generic. Provides additional requirements to facilitate DQMC implementation within Navy Medicine. Adds additional Navy Medicine unique DQMC requirements. 6

7. Our Request Assess the FY11 Review List and Navy Medicine guidance and discuss during your Data Quality Assurance Team meeting. – You know your mission best – You know what your trouble spots are best Forward any concerns and recommendations to your Regional DQMC POC. Keep in mind the timeframe for annual updates. Ensure that recommendations are complete: – Identify question # and old verbiage – Provide justification for update, as well as proposed method to measure (can be yes/no) – Brownie points if you include recommended verbiage 7

8. 8 Summary The TMA/Navy Medicine DQMC Guidance (Review List) is updated annually Feedback from the fields is encouraged Forward your complete recommendations to your appropriate Regional DQMC Manager

9. Q&A Questions? 9