1. Extending Access: Priorities and Solutions, November 2005 What are publishers doing to support research needs? Martin Richardson

2. Extending Access: Priorities and Solutions, November 2005 What resources do researchers use? Life Sciences & Medicine Physical Sciences & Engineering Social Sciences Arts/Humanities Journals Datasets Books Reports Journals Postprints Preprints Conferences Journals Datasets Books Texts Books Journals Texts Non-Textual Source: JISC Disciplinary Differences Report, 2005

3. Extending Access: Priorities and Solutions, November 2005 Life Sciences & Medicine Physical Sciences & Engineering Social Sciences Arts/Humanities Journals Databases Books Conferences Journals Conferences Databases Books Journals Books Databases Conferences Journals Books Databases Travel Source: JISC Disciplinary Differences Report, 2005 Main Access problems encountered by researchers

4. Extending Access: Priorities and Solutions, November 2005 Life Sciences & Medicine Physical Sciences & Engineering Social Sciences Arts/Humanities Gateways Citation Databases A&I Services Search Engines Citation Databases A&I Services Bibliographic Services Search Engines A&I Services Bibliographic Services Citation Databases Search Engines Bibliographic Services A&I Services Reference Works Source: JISC Disciplinary Differences Report, 2005 What search or reference tools are essential to researchers?

5. Extending Access: Priorities and Solutions, November 2005 Source: Ciber author survey 2005 Researchers views as authors and readers

6. Extending Access: Priorities and Solutions, November 2005 Source: Ciber author survey 2005 Researchers views as authors and readers

7. Extending Access: Priorities and Solutions, November 2005 More online publishing  Journals Current issues Back archive  Monographs Oxford scholarship online How is OUP Responding?

8. Extending Access: Priorities and Solutions, November 2005  Reference and citation linking  Full-text indexing by search engines  Metadata distribution to A&I services  Archiving How is OUP Responding? Integration with discovery tools and other online resources

9. Extending Access: Priorities and Solutions, November 2005 How is OUP Responding? MonographsJournals Subscriptions  Consortia  Doc. Delivery-  Purchase  Developing countries  Open Access  Choice of access models

10. Extending Access: Priorities and Solutions, November 2005 Case Study: Nucleic Acids Research

11. Extending Access: Priorities and Solutions, November 2005 Case Study: Nucleic Acids Research

12. Extending Access: Priorities and Solutions, November 2005 Case study: Oxford Open No Journals Articles Accepted OA Articles % OA Life Sciences64124912 Medicine3911011 Social Sciences & Humanities 1119200 Total20645599

13. Extending Access: Priorities and Solutions, November 2005 Toll-free link  Link resides in IR rather than final post print  Allows continued and consistent collection and analysis of usage and citation data  It is clear to a casual reader which version of an article is the final and authoritative one  Less likely to cause subscription cancellation and undermine the revenue streams that fund the publication process, including peer-review Institutional Repositories: an alternative model?

14. Author Journal OUP Journals Online OAI (Open Archives Initiative) harvesters & aggregators e.g. www.OAIster.org Oxford University Eprints I.R. Article Link to OUP for PDF full text delivery Metadata to Oxford Eprints OAI harvesters crawl and index OAI-compliant websites (Self-archiving) The OUP/Sherpa Project

15. Extending Access: Priorities and Solutions, November 2005 Oxford eprints usage

16. Extending Access: Priorities and Solutions, November 2005 Summary  Research communities from different disciplines have different requirements  Authors have different needs to readers  A wide variety of types of research publication are necessary to meet these diverse requirements  Maximising cost effective access to research information is unlikely to be achieved by a single model  No access model can compensate for inadequate funding of the research communication system