1. IBERs and eTheses eTheses in the wider research context - National level - Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham

2. SHERPA aims and outcomes IBERs - institutionally-based e-print repositories Advice - setting up, IPR, deposit, preservation Advocacy - awareness, promotion, change

3. SHERPA Project Development Partners – Nottingham, Edinburgh, Glasgow, Oxford, White Rose Consortium, British Library, AHDS Associate Partners –Birmingham, Bristol, Cambridge, Newcastle, Durham, London LEAP Consortium Funding from JISC and CURL

4. Institutionally-based e-print repositories Institutional basis Institutional integration Cultural change Adopt existing professional perspectives

5. IBERs in institutions One repository - or many - what is the difference? pre-print and post-print IBERs a suite of open access resources integration into information strategies

6. Broader Context OAI - OAJ, OAR ARROWs, DARE Berlin Declaration Wellcome Trust Parliamentary Inquiry

7. IBERs and eTheses Shared aims - to disseminate research Shared concerns - process, IPR, plagiarism, preservation Shared solutions - software, portals, work-flows Shared advocacy - three constituencies, three targets Shared strategy - open access, institutional perspectives, individual actions

8. http://www.sherpa.ac.uk bill.hubbard@nottingham.ac.uk