1. Orange County Concurrency Management Ordinance Board Of County Commissioners Public Hearing May 21, 2013 Orange County Concurrency Management Ordinance Board Of County Commissioners Public Hearing May 21, 2013

2. Presentation Outline  Purpose  Background  Ordinance Amendments  Consistency Determination  Requested Action

3. Presentation Outline  Purpose  Background  Ordinance Amendments  Consistency Determination  Requested Action  Request

4. Public Hearing For Amendments To The Concurrency Management Ordinance Purpose

5. Presentation Outline  Purpose  Background  Ordinance Amendments  Consistency Determination  Requested Action  Request

6. BackgroundBackground 2011 Amendment – HB 7207   Removed Financial Feasibility Requirements   Made Transportation Concurrency Optional Orange County Retained Concurrency   Changed application of Proportionate Share Formula Revision 2011 Amendment – HB 7207   Removed Financial Feasibility Requirements   Made Transportation Concurrency Optional Orange County Retained Concurrency   Changed application of Proportionate Share Formula Revision

7. BackgroundBackground Proposed Changes Are Intended to Achieve The Following: Promote Development Of A Multi-Modal Transportation InfrastructurePromote Development Of A Multi-Modal Transportation Infrastructure Support Urban Infill RedevelopmentSupport Urban Infill Redevelopment Streamline Concurrency ProcessStreamline Concurrency Process Streamline School Mitigation Agreement ProcessStreamline School Mitigation Agreement Process Proposed Changes Are Intended to Achieve The Following: Promote Development Of A Multi-Modal Transportation InfrastructurePromote Development Of A Multi-Modal Transportation Infrastructure Support Urban Infill RedevelopmentSupport Urban Infill Redevelopment Streamline Concurrency ProcessStreamline Concurrency Process Streamline School Mitigation Agreement ProcessStreamline School Mitigation Agreement Process

8. Presentation Outline  Purpose  Background  Ordinance Amendments  Consistency Determination  Requested Action

9. Ordinance Amendments Revisions Include  Sec. 30-501 Definitions Alternative Mobility AreaAlternative Mobility Area Pedestrian Connectivity IndexPedestrian Connectivity Index Projects That Promote Public Transportation Projects That Promote Public Transportation Deleted Concurrency Review CommitteeDeleted Concurrency Review Committee  Sec. 30-506 Defines Transportation Concurrency Exception AreaDefines Transportation Concurrency Exception Area  Sec. 30-507 Defines Criteria And Process For Projects That Promote Public TransportationDefines Criteria And Process For Projects That Promote Public Transportation Revisions Include  Sec. 30-501 Definitions Alternative Mobility AreaAlternative Mobility Area Pedestrian Connectivity IndexPedestrian Connectivity Index Projects That Promote Public Transportation Projects That Promote Public Transportation Deleted Concurrency Review CommitteeDeleted Concurrency Review Committee  Sec. 30-506 Defines Transportation Concurrency Exception AreaDefines Transportation Concurrency Exception Area  Sec. 30-507 Defines Criteria And Process For Projects That Promote Public TransportationDefines Criteria And Process For Projects That Promote Public Transportation

10. Ordinance Amendments Revisions Include  Page 23, Line 978 Concurrency Review Committee (CRC) Eliminated (RAC to Review and Recommend To BCC)Concurrency Review Committee (CRC) Eliminated (RAC to Review and Recommend To BCC)  Page 24, Section 30-581 Transportation Concurrency Procedure Flow Chart RevisedTransportation Concurrency Procedure Flow Chart Revised  Page 39 (4) and Page 47 (m) Expedited Prop. Share Approval Process DeletedExpedited Prop. Share Approval Process Deleted Revisions Include  Page 23, Line 978 Concurrency Review Committee (CRC) Eliminated (RAC to Review and Recommend To BCC)Concurrency Review Committee (CRC) Eliminated (RAC to Review and Recommend To BCC)  Page 24, Section 30-581 Transportation Concurrency Procedure Flow Chart RevisedTransportation Concurrency Procedure Flow Chart Revised  Page 39 (4) and Page 47 (m) Expedited Prop. Share Approval Process DeletedExpedited Prop. Share Approval Process Deleted

11. Ordinance Amendments Revisions Include  Sec. 30-621 Process For Denials, Mitigation, Proportionate Share Contribution Prop. Share Contribution = Proportionate Share Of CostOF Improvement Funded For Construction In CIP, CIS or LTTCMSProp. Share Contribution = Proportionate Share Of CostOF Improvement Funded For Construction In CIP, CIS or LTTCMS If No Improvement Available, Applicant May Propose And Contribute To A Mobility ImprovementIf No Improvement Available, Applicant May Propose And Contribute To A Mobility Improvement Sec. 30-622 Proportionate Share Formula RevisedSec. 30-622 Proportionate Share Formula Revised Revisions Include  Sec. 30-621 Process For Denials, Mitigation, Proportionate Share Contribution Prop. Share Contribution = Proportionate Share Of CostOF Improvement Funded For Construction In CIP, CIS or LTTCMSProp. Share Contribution = Proportionate Share Of CostOF Improvement Funded For Construction In CIP, CIS or LTTCMS If No Improvement Available, Applicant May Propose And Contribute To A Mobility ImprovementIf No Improvement Available, Applicant May Propose And Contribute To A Mobility Improvement Sec. 30-622 Proportionate Share Formula RevisedSec. 30-622 Proportionate Share Formula Revised

12. Ordinance Amendments Revisions Include  Page 46 (f) Impact Fee Credits Now Disbursed On A Dollar For Dollar BasisImpact Fee Credits Now Disbursed On A Dollar For Dollar Basis CMO to recommend School Mitigation Agreement to BCC for approvalCMO to recommend School Mitigation Agreement to BCC for approval Revisions Include  Page 46 (f) Impact Fee Credits Now Disbursed On A Dollar For Dollar BasisImpact Fee Credits Now Disbursed On A Dollar For Dollar Basis CMO to recommend School Mitigation Agreement to BCC for approvalCMO to recommend School Mitigation Agreement to BCC for approval

13. Presentation Outline  Purpose  Background  Ordinance Amendments  Consistency Determination  Requested Action

14. Consistency Determination Consistency of Proposed Ordinance T2.2.1 : Maintain Level Of Service And Ensure Roadway Projects Are Financially FeasibleT2.2.1 : Maintain Level Of Service And Ensure Roadway Projects Are Financially Feasible T2.2.3: The County shall enforce applicable concurrency regulations on new development permits for non-vested development that adversely impact constrained or backlogged facilities.T2.2.3: The County shall enforce applicable concurrency regulations on new development permits for non-vested development that adversely impact constrained or backlogged facilities. Consistency of Proposed Ordinance T2.2.1 : Maintain Level Of Service And Ensure Roadway Projects Are Financially FeasibleT2.2.1 : Maintain Level Of Service And Ensure Roadway Projects Are Financially Feasible T2.2.3: The County shall enforce applicable concurrency regulations on new development permits for non-vested development that adversely impact constrained or backlogged facilities.T2.2.3: The County shall enforce applicable concurrency regulations on new development permits for non-vested development that adversely impact constrained or backlogged facilities.

15. Presentation Outline  Purpose  Background  Ordinance Amendments  Consistency Determination  Requested Action

16. Staff Recommendation:Adopt LPA Recommendation:Adopt Make A Finding Of Consistency With The Comprehensive Plan And Adopt The Proposed Ordinance As Amended Requested Action