Download presentation
1
Lecture 19: Externalities & Health
Richard Smith Reader in Health Economics School of Medicine, Health Policy & Practice 1
2
Overview of lecture What are ‘externalities’?
Positive externalities and health Negative externalities and health ‘Global’ externalities and health Externalities and public goods 2
3
What are ‘externalities’?
Costs and/or benefits of actions by one party which affect other parties Externalities exist wherever a transaction affects an uncompensated party Policy issue – design of appropriate institutions & legislation to align individual incentives & social welfare Externalities (with public goods) are main reason for public health care systems worldwide 2
4
Positive externality Positive externality – where social benefit of consumption of good exceeds private benefit Private benefit – benefit to consumers who buy and consume good Social benefit – benefit to all in society, including those who do not consume it Equals private benefit of consumption plus benefit to others Causes market failure (too little consumption) 3
5
Positive externalities & health
Caring for health of others (Good Samaritan) interdependent utility functions UA=U(hA, yA, hB); UB=U(hB, yB, hA), where h=health, y=income (other goods) Private health increases national wealth Knowledge & technology Communicable disease surveillance & infectious disease control (Lecture 21) Vaccination (herd immunity effect) 3
6
Positive Externality P S = MPC = MSC D = MPB Q
In equilibrium, marginal private cost equals marginal social cost with no marginal cost to other people. The marginal private benefit curve is the demand curve. The marginal private cost curve is the supply curve. D = MPB Q 77
7
Positive Externality P S = MPC = MSC A Equilibrium Price PA D = MPB Q
QA 78
8
Positive Externality P S = MPC = MSC A Equilibrium Price PA D = MPB Q
QA Equilibrium Output 79
9
Positive Externality P S = MPC = MSC A Equilibrium Price PA D = MPB Q
Consumer Surplus A Equilibrium Price PA Producer Surplus D = MPB Q QA Equilibrium Output 80
10
Positive Externality P S = MPC = MSC A Equilibrium Price PA MSB
Consumer Surplus A Equilibrium Price PA Producer Surplus MSB D = MPB Q QA Equilibrium Output 81
11
Positive Externality P S = MPC = MSC B A Equilibrium Price PA MSB
Consumer Surplus A Equilibrium Price PA Producer Surplus MSB D = MPB Q QA QB Equilibrium Output Herd immunity (eg 80% coverage) 82
12
Positive Externality P S = MPC = MSC B A Equilibrium Price PA MSB
Consumer Surplus A Equilibrium Price PA Producer Surplus MSB D = MPB Q QA QB Equilibrium Output Economically Efficient Output 83
13
Positive Externality P S = MPC = MSC B A Equilibrium Price PA MSB
Consumer Surplus A Equilibrium Price PA Producer Surplus MSB D = MPB Q QA QB Equilibrium Output Economically Efficient Output 84
14
Total Gain to Other People
Positive Externality P Total Gain to Other People S = MPC = MSC B Consumer Surplus A Equilibrium Price PA Producer Surplus MSB D = MPB Q QA QB Equilibrium Output Economically Efficient Output 85
15
Total Gain to Other People
Positive Externality P Total Gain to Other People S = MPC = MSC B Consumer Surplus A Equilibrium Price PA Producer Surplus MSB D = MPB Q QA QB Equilibrium Output Economically Efficient Output 86
16
Positive Externality P Deadweight Social Loss S = MPC = MSC B A
Total Gain to Other People S = MPC = MSC B Consumer Surplus A Equilibrium Price PA Producer Surplus MSB D = MPB Q QA QB Equilibrium Output Economically Efficient Output 87
17
Policy options (Pigouvian) subsidies to ‘internalize’ external benefit
changing private benefits so they equal social benefits, such as providing ‘free’ vaccines Direct provision of good, such as vaccine Property rights to ‘correct’ market (e.g A ‘owns’ right not to be vaccinated, or B owns right to vaccinate) – UK vs USA schools 2
18
Negative externality Negative externality – where social cost of consumption of good exceeds private cost Private cost – cost to consumers who buy and consume good Social cost – cost to all in society, including those who do not consume it Equals private cost of consumption plus cost to others Causes market failure (too much consumption) 3
19
Negative externalities & health
Infectious disease Large part of reason behind public health movement in 19th Century (UK=PHLS/HPA; USA=PHS/CDC) Lecture 21 – antibiotic resistance Environmental degradation (vehicle emissions) Child day care individual vs social costs and benefits Tobacco & passive smoking 3
20
Equilibrium with a Negative Externality
Price/ Cost Quantity 13
21
Equilibrium with a Negative Externality
Price/ Cost S (MPC) The marginal private cost (MPC) of producing a good is the increase in total private cost from producing an additional unit. The marginal private cost curve is the industry supply curve under perfect competition. D (MPB/MSB) Quantity 14
22
Equilibrium with a Negative Externality
Price/ Cost S (MPC) A Equilibrium Price PA D (MPB/MSB) QA Quantity 15
23
Equilibrium with a Negative Externality
Price/ Cost MSC S (MPC) A Equilibrium Price PA The marginal social cost (MPC) of producing a good is the increase in the total social cost from producing an additional unit D (MPB/MSB) QA Quantity 16
24
Equilibrium with a Negative Externality
Price/ Cost MSC B S (MPC) A Equilibrium Price PA A negative externality creates economic inefficiency because the equilibrium quantity exceeds the economically efficient quantity. D (MPB/MSB) QB QA Quantity 17
25
Equilibrium with a Negative Externality
Price/ Cost MSC B S (MPC) A Equilibrium Price PA D (MPB/MSB) QB QA Quantity Equilibrium Output 18
26
Equilibrium with a Negative Externality
Price/ Cost MSC B S (MPC) A Equilibrium Price PA D (MPB/MSB) QB QA Quantity Economically Efficient Output Equilibrium Output 19
27
Deadweight Social Losses From Smoking
P MSC MPC = S Consumers purchase too much of a product in equilibrium, resulting in economic inefficiency. Negative externalities result in deadweight social losses. D Q 22
28
Deadweight Social Losses From Smoking
P MSC MPC = S A PA = £3 D Q QA 23
29
Deadweight Social Losses From Smoking
P MSC £10 MPC = S A PA = £3 D Q QA 25
30
Deadweight Social Losses From Smoking
P MSC £10 MPC = S A PA = £3 D Q QA 26
31
Deadweight Social Losses From Smoking
P MSC £10 Deadweight Social Loss MPC = S A PA = £3 D Q QA 27
32
Deadweight Social Losses From Smoking
P MSC £10 Deadweight Social Loss B PB = £5 MPC = S A PA = £3 D Q QB QA 28
33
Deadweight Social Losses From Smoking
NOTE – the economically efficient level of production is not zero! It would mean doing completely without goods yielding some benefit Economically efficient level occurs when marginal benefit of reducing externality equals the marginal cost of reducing it Policy issue is how to achieve this level 30
34
Policy options (Pigouvian) taxation to ‘internalize’ external cost (e.g. cigarettes, petrol) changing private costs so they equal social costs Regulation of overall quantity produced (rationing e.g. cigarettes, petrol) Property rights to ‘correct’ market (e.g. A ‘owns’ right to clean air, or B owns right to pollute air – determines flow of compensation, subsidy, tax etc) 30
35
Taxation P Old MPC A D Q 54
36
Taxation P New MPC = MSC Old MPC A D Q
To internalize an externality, the marginal private cost must equal the marginal social cost of the product. D Q 55
37
Taxation P New MPC = MSC Old MPC B PB = £5 A D QB Q 56
38
Taxation P New MPC = MSC Old MPC B PB = £5 A PS = £2 D QB Q 57
39
Taxation PB Tax = £3 PS P New MPC = MSC Old MPC B A D QB Q
The highest price that a person would be willing to pay to reduce an externality is the value of the harm the externality causes that person. PS D QB Q 58
40
Problems with taxation
Taxation may not internalize all externalities (demand subject to other influences) Taxation can internalize externalities only if transactions costs (implementing the taxation system) are sufficiently low Coase theorem 46
41
Coase Theorem Equilibrium is economically efficient regardless of who holds property rights – producer or consumer – when transactions costs are low BUT: Equilibrium not economically efficient when transactions costs are high – depends on property rights, laws etc 48
42
Regulation Direct government intervention to determine quantity of production/consumption (rather than indirectly through price) Though incentives/quota’s (e.g. vaccine targets, incentive payments to GPs, congestion charge) Through legislation (e.g. smoking in public places) Through production/distribution (e.g. communicable disease surveillance) 59
43
Problems with Regulation
Costs may differ between firms and/or consumers which may not be accounted for Uncertainty over MSB/MPB and MSC/MPC curves (required to set optimal equilibria) Political costs Transaction costs 59
44
‘Global’ externalities & health
Communicable diseases HIV/AIDS – global (geographic & demographic) Tuberculosis - global (geographic & demographic) Malaria - regional (geographic) Acute Respiratory Infection, Diarrhoea – local (geographic & demographic) Economic effects of ill-health HIV/AIDS in Southern Africa – regional to global 50
45
‘Global’ externality – (re)emerging infectious diseases 1996-2003
Legionnaire’s Disease Multidrug resistant Salmonella Cryptosporidiosis E.coli O157 E.coli non-O157 Typhoid SARS BSE Malaria E.coli O157 nvCJD Lyme Borreliosis West Nile Virus Diphtheria West Nile Fever SARS Reston virus Echinococcosis Lassa fever W135 Nipah Virus Yellow fever Cholera 0139 Reston Virus Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis Buruli ulcer RVF/VHF Dengue haemhorrhagic fever O’nyong-nyong fever Ebola haemorrhagic fever Human Monkeypox Dengue haemhorrhagic fever Cholera Cholera Equine morbillivirus Hendra virus 50
46
Cost of global health externalities
50
47
Externalities & public goods
Goods with significant positive externalities are often public goods Goods with significant negative externalities are, conversely, public ‘bads’ Public goods (bads) are under (over) consumed for additional reasons Lecture 20! 50
48
Further references McPake B, Kumaranayake L, Normand C (2002), Health Economics: an International Perspective. London: Routledge. Chapter 8. Getzen T (2004). Health Economics: fundamentals and flow of funds. New York: Wiley. Chapter 15. Smith RD, Coast J. Controlling antimicrobial resistance: a proposed transferable permit market. Health Policy, 1998; 43: Coast J, Smith RD, Millar MR. An economic perspective on policy to reduce antimicrobial resistance. Social Science & Medicine, 1998; 46: For future ref: Smith, RD, Drager N. Cross-border risks and public health security. Oxford University Press. Smith RD, Drager N, Hardimann M. The rapid assessment of the economic impact of public health emergencies of international concern. World Health Organization. Yeung RYT, Smith RD. Can we use contingent valuation to assess the private demand for childhood immunization in developing countries? Applied Health Economics and Health Policy. 50
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.