1. Future Server and Storage Technology Brian Minick, Infrastructure Design Leader - GE

2. High Performance Computing Current Architecture NAS Storage ClientTwo Racks of Clustered Server

3. The Challenge Funding Secured To Create Next Gen Storage and Server Platforms Brick and Mortar Manufacturing Business New storage platform requirements –Cost Cost Cost –Data center space –Power restrictions –Improve storage performance

4. The New Technology Clustered Storage –Storage and processing in each unit –Units are aware of each other and cluster together –Disk allocation works like your hard drive Standard NAS –Processing and storage are separate –Processing units do not cluster –Disks are partitioned in to LUNs, LUNs are combined to create volumes, files systems are created out of volumes, directories are within file systems Which Way To Go?

5. The Results Clustered Storage –Job scheduling time improves by 80% –Job processing time improves by 40% –Maintenance costs are reduced by 20% –Data center space reduced by 10% –Power consumption remains the same –20% Maintenance reduction allows your team to meet cost out target – you get $2,000 recognition award and a promotion

6. The Results Standard NAS –Job scheduling time improves by 5% –Job processing time improves by 2% –Maintenance costs are remain the same –Data center space remains the same –Power consumption remains the same –Project is a success, life goes on as usual

7. The Challenge Funding Secured To Create Next Gen Storage and Server Platforms Brick and Mortar Manufacturing Business New server platform requirements –Cost Cost Cost –Data center space –Power restrictions

8. The New Technology Blade Servers –Large reduction in power consumption –Reduced heat generation –Proprietary –Cheaper than rack after purchasing 8 or 10 blades Standard Rack Servers –Small reduction in power consumption –Same heat generation Which Way To Go?

9. The Results Blade Servers –Power consumption reduced from 260 amps to 60 –Heat generation reduced by 15% –Total environment cost down 10% –Server backplane created spanning tree issues on data center network resulting in complete center outage –Customers are leaving our site –Layoffs are eminent

10. The Results Standard Rack Servers –Power consumption reduced from 260 amps to 220 –Same heat generation –Total environment cost remains the same –Server backplane created spanning tree issues on data center network resulting in complete center outage –Project is a success, life goes on as usual

11. Next Generation Web Server Current Architecture Internet Load BalancerServer FarmNAS Storage

12. The Challenge Current server platform is discontinued by vendor Online research firm New server platform requirements –Cost Cost Cost –Data center space –Power restrictions

13. The New Technology Multi-Core –Two 1.0Ghz 8 core processors (off chip floating point) –8 GB Ram –292 GB Internal Disk –Two PCI-x and two PCIe slots Next Gen Single Core –Two 1.5Ghz single core processors –8 GB Ram –292 GB Internal Disk –Two PCI-x and two PCIe slots Which Way To Go?

14. The Results Multi-Core –Two for one server swap out Maintenance costs lowered by 50% Lowered power consumption by 70% Data center space reduced by 50% –More throughput, but each transaction is slower Transactions previously over 20 seconds are noticeably slower Customers are leaving our site Layoffs are eminent

15. The Results Next Gen Single Core –One for one server swap out Maintenance costs lowered by the same Lowered power consumption by 20% Data center space remains the same –Same throughput, but each transaction is faster Transactions previously over 20 seconds are noticeably faster New customers are coming to the site Profit sharing checks are especially good this year

16. What’s the Point Know when to take technology swings –Technology decisions have business impact –Technology decisions impact careers Technology means different things for different businesses –Core product is IT –Core product relies on IT –IT is a productivity tool Successful technologist know how to walk the line between “technology for technology sake” and “technology for business sake”