1. Preliminary Findings CCEA Task Force: Shelly Parini, BJ Nicoletti, Dave Arter, Tory Blackwell, Angie Sandercock, Marcia Casey, Jenelle Vader, Stephanie Schaefer, Bill Briare, Abe Fouhy, Phillip King, Suzy Isham, Janet Paulson, Carrie Loewen, Amanda Coffey, Kate Gray

2. Overall Process

3. Highlights Asked 55 questions in 8 categories of engagement/culture – students, community, communication, collaboration, innovation, processes, campus, overall Good participation. 361. Good representation. Good analysis foundation. Team has rocked so far. Sharing the results with you. You and others are getting this summary and access to the detailed aggregate results. All posted here. Couple pages handout. http://depts.clackamas.edu/research/OtherOfInterest.aspx

4. Highlights of Findings First, let me take a quick minute to walk you through the whole preliminary summary doc. It is helpfully layered for you to take in general findings to detail as you may wish. Many positives across the board. We can be proud of that. Yet, there clearly areas of hoped for improvement. The survey tool serves its purpose and points to which areas. Out of the 8 areas, there is interest in some improvement everywhere, of course. Two of the eight areas stand out – college processes for engaging, and engaging with innovation, trust and balance. Now, take a minute to look at the two page handout you received. Let’s take a few minutes to think about and share some about what jumps out to you. We’ll be able to do more of this down the road.

5. Next Steps Spring 2014 Reporting to Presidents’ Council and gathering feedback. Distributing results to CCC community. Reporting to College Council and gathering feedback. Task force continues to analyze all data gathered. Fall 2014 Two sessions during In-service offered to dig into data about community and students. Focus groups formed and meeting to discuss what actions on the findings are possible.

6. Next Steps You Personally Can Take (aka – the famous “keep this in, take this out” comments) Summer and Fall, participate in and encourage others in your immediate work area to sponsor a presentation of the findings to those in their area. Summer and Fall, personally consider ways to adopt items from the CCEA process for improvement to integrate with your area's work. (IR example) Consider participatin g in and encouraging others in your immediate work area to participate in Fall focus group discussions to identify strategies for strengthening our culture of communication, engagement and assessment campus-wide.

7. Example of Use by a Department (IR), Part of Our Blueprint (department plan) CCEA ItemAll types agreement Mostly or Completely agree 1. CCC has effective processes in place to hear students’ interests, needs, and feedback on their experience at this college. 71%52% 2. Student suggestions are used to improve programs and services.66%38% 3. Employee suggestions are used to improve programs and services.60%32% 4. CCC has effective processes in place to hear community interest, needs, and feedback on the success of the college in meeting community needs. 77%52% 5. Community suggestions are used to improve programs and services at CCC. 73%45% 6. Employee suggestions are sought out and used to strengthen CCC’s relationship with our communities. 60%31% 7. Quality information is consistently used in a timely manner to improve our college processes. 52%28%