Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

JongHoo Choi, SeungMan Hong, JongChul Shin, SunKyoung Kim, HyokMin Kwon Department of Information and Statistics, Korea University Comparison of the Time.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "JongHoo Choi, SeungMan Hong, JongChul Shin, SunKyoung Kim, HyokMin Kwon Department of Information and Statistics, Korea University Comparison of the Time."— Presentation transcript:

1 JongHoo Choi, SeungMan Hong, JongChul Shin, SunKyoung Kim, HyokMin Kwon Department of Information and Statistics, Korea University Comparison of the Time Series Models for Trend Analysis of Cyber Shopping Mall in South Korea

2 Contents 5. Discussion & Conclusions 4. Comparison of time series models 3. Data and time plot 2. Outline of the cyber shopping mall survey 1. Introduction

3 The aim of this work is to compare three time series model for trend analysis of cyber shopping mall in South Korea and perform cross validation check ARIMA Model Exponential Smoothing Time Series Regression

4 5. Discussion & Conclusions 4. Comparison of time series models 3. Data and time plot 1. Introduction 2. Outline of the cyber shopping mall survey Contents

5 Cyber Shopping Mall Survey  Monthly surveys that are performed from KNSO (Korea National Statistical Office)  Collecting detailed data to measure the size, growth and nature of E-commerce in South Korea  Serve as a useful reference for the policy-making, business management and research activities 2. Cyber Shopping Mall Survey Purpose

6  Internet cyber malls focused on B2C  1st ~ 22nd of every month Period Coverage 2. Cyber Shopping Mall Survey

7  8 items on general information name of the shopping mall, name of the operator company, URL, type of organization, launching date, workers, how to operate the Web site, classification of hopping mall  8 items on intensity and infrastructure of E-commerce Transaction value by category of products, size of income, composition of delivery means, composition of buyers, composition of products by type of procurement, composition of payment means, security system, authentication authority Survey Items 2. Cyber Shopping Mall Survey

8 5. Discussion & Conclusions 4. Comparison of time series models 2. Outline of the cyber shopping mall survey 3. Data and time plot 1. Introduction Contents

9 3. Data and time plot year month 2001200220032004200520062007 11,8652,2122,9963,3893,5084,3714,529 21,8672,2763,0823,4153,5254,389 31,9152,3343,1883,3963,5724,403 41,9512,3653,2423,4113,6274,421 51,9792,3723,2893,4593,7684,454 61,9982,4273,3203,4743,8564,472 72,0262,4913,3393,4744,0054,478 82,0322,5783,3433,4374,0514,490 92,0722,6573,3503,4394,1584,504 102,1052,7693,3533,4614,2294,518 112,1352,8743,3523,4784,3224,524 122,1682,8963,3583,4894,3554,531 From KNSO Table 1. Data HoldoutSample(test set)

10 Figure 1. Time Plot 3. Data and time plot

11 5. Discussion & Conclusions 3. Data and time plot 2. Outline of the cyber shopping mall survey 4. Comparison of time series models 1. Introduction Contents

12 4. Comparison of time series models Comparison of time series models Comparison of time series models 2 Exponential Smoothing Time Series Regression 3 1 ARIMA Model

13  ARIMA is the best model that analysis all possible univariate time series model depend on probability process model (Box & Jenkines,1970)  We determine whether the time series we wish to forecast is stationary. If it is not, we must transform the time series using the difference  To check stationallity, we attempt to unit root test using ADF(Augmented Dickey-Fuller) statistic (Dickey&Fuller,1981) 4. Comparison of time series models  ARIMA (AutoRegressive Integrated Moving Average) ARIMA

14 4. Comparison of time series models Figure 2. Correlogram ARIMA

15 AICSBCSEAICSBCSE ARIMA(2,1,4)618.11633.9926.84ARIMA(2,1,1)623.39632.0928.40 ARIMA(4,1,2)618.26631.3126.92ARIMA(4,1,1)625.42636.2928.64 ARIMA(4,1,3)619.20632.2427.12ARIMA(2,1,2)625.51635.2129.09 ARIMA(3,1,1)620.59629.2927.80ARIMA(3,1,2)626.94635.6329.19 ARIMA(1,1,4)621.81630.5128.06ARIMA(1,1,2)627.98636.6829.42 Table 2. ARIMA(p,d,q) candidates  We select the best 10 models among the all possible combination based on the model selection criteria of AIC, SBC and SE  ARIMA(2,1,4) is recommended for the analysis 4. Comparison of time series models ARIMA

16 Figure 3. Result from ARIMA(2,1,4) 4. Comparison of time series models ARIMA

17  Smoothing Constant value is 0.105 from One-Parameter Double Exponential Smoothing  In most exponential smoothing applications, the value of the smoothing constant used is between 0.01 and 0.30 (Bowerman & O'Connell, 1993)  As it is less than 0.3, One-Parameter Double Exponential smoothing is recommended 4. Comparison of time series models  Exponential Smoothing Exponential Smoothing

18 Figure 4. Result from Exponential Smoothing 4. Comparison of time series models Exponential Smoothing

19 4. Comparison of time series models  Time Series Regression  We applied the time series regression model as z t = β 0 +β 1 t+β 2 t 2 +β 3 t 3 +β 4 sin( )+β 5 cos( )+ε t (Bowerman & O'Connell, 1993) Time Series Regression

20 Figure 5. Result from time series regression model 4. Comparison of time series models Time Series Regression

21 Original value ARIMA Expected Exponential Smoothing Time Series Regression Jul.200644784500.364548.234481.88 Aug.200644904514.424592.324490.65 Sep.200645044543.874636.414499.78 Oct.200645184575.974680.494511.16 Nov.200645244601.654724.584526.61 Dec.200645314626.124768.674547.85 Jan.200745294660.244812.764576.44 MSE5478.65337978.86374.62 Table 3. Cross validation check The cross validation check is performed based on MSE criterion  The time series regression model seems to be the best one 4. Comparison of time series models

22 Figure 6. Forecasting performance ExponentialSmoothing ARIMA Time SeriesRegression 4. Comparison of time series models

23  Time series regression models is the best one for long-term forecasting  It is relevant to the result of cross validation check 4. Comparison of time series models

24 3. Data and time plot 2. Outline of the cyber shopping mall survey 5. Discussion & Conclusions 1. Introduction Contents

25 The further research - Trend analysis of the sales amount of cyber shopping mall - Compare general malls with specialized malls - Investigate into the co-movement of the economic time series with cyber shopping trend Discussion &Conclusions Discussion &Conclusions 2. The data is not enough to conclude definitely 1.Time series regression model is recommended for forecasting of number of Cyber shopping mall 5. Discussions & Conclusions

26 References Akaike, H. (1976). Canonical Correlations Analysis of Time Series and the Use of an Information Criterion. System Identification: Advances and Case studies (Eds.R.Mehra and D.G.Lainiotis), 27-96, New York : Academic Press. Box, G. E. P. and Jenkins, G. M. (1970). Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control, San Francisco : Holden-Day. Bowerman, B. L. and O'Connell, R. T. (1993). Forecasting and Time Series : An Applied Approach, 3rd Edition, California : Duxbury Press. KNSO(2006) http://kosis.nso.go.kr/cgi-bin/sws_999.cgi?ID=DT_1KE1001&IDTYPE=3 Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the Dimension of a Model, The Annals of Statistics, Vol. 6, No.2,461-464.

27 Q & A

28


Download ppt "JongHoo Choi, SeungMan Hong, JongChul Shin, SunKyoung Kim, HyokMin Kwon Department of Information and Statistics, Korea University Comparison of the Time."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google